The initial combat? When did combat ever end?
You understood what I meant by "initial combat". Mission accomplished was when when the Iraqi army collapsed as an organized force and we could start the process of rebuilding Iraq's government, security forces and infrastructure. And McCain was accurate, unlike many on your side of this debate, about how long it would take to get to that point.
And my party? I'm not quite suite the Socialistische Partij Anders made that detailed statements about the war in Iraq.
My personal opinion is that socialists in Belgium should butt out of our election and mind their own business.
They were SO greeted as liberators by the Iraqis that the war continues up to five years later.
Do you really think the war continued because of the people who welcomed our troops and their liberation in large numbers? Are you that out of touch with what went on in Iraq? What can I say if you choose to simply ignore the MANY media outlets that reported the welcome our troops received. Even French radio reported it.
Face it, McBush sold the war to the American people by claiming it would be a cakewalk and it turned out to be a catastrophe.
Well it's already clear that McCain was right about what it would take to defeat the Iraqi Army. And you haven't a clue what Bush told Americans to expect because you apparently read anything he said or wrote at the time. You just believe whatever garbage your little socialist party's propaganda organ is spewing out for you today. And Iraq hasn't been a catastrophe ... it's turning out to be a great victory that our soldiers look on with great PRIDE ... an emotion the Obama side of this house (which apparently includes you, even though you can't vote in our election) can't understand because apparently they haven't felt pride in America for 30 years.
McCain's first visit to Iraq was in August 2003. He kept making ignorant and false statements (about the way the war was fought) up until at least December 2005
Actually, he consistently said that we were fighting the war the wrong way and that we needed to deal with it using better counterinsurgency tactics. But then I don't expect you are aware of that because I suspect you weren't even aware that McCain's first visit to Iraq was in August 2003
until I told you.
1) Sectarian violence is way done from a year ago.
2) al-Sadr's Iranian backed militia no longer controls any Iraqi regions and it's leader has fled the country to Iran.
3) al-Qaeda's top Iraqi leadership is either dead, captured or has fled the country (apparently for Afghanistan). al-Qaeda is having trouble recruiting in Iraq, and may not be sending new recruits from elsewhere to Iraq any longer.
4) US and Iraqi casualties are way down.
5) Iraq's security forces are nearly up to full strength, increasingly well trained, performing well in combat, and close to taking over responsibility for all regions of Iraq outside a few military specialties.
6) Iraq has made significant political progress and continues to demonstrate it's government is respected by the people and able to weather crises and elections.
7) Iraq's economy is starting to boom, and not just in Kurdish areas. Foreign investors are now wanting to invest in Iraq.
Gee ... I'd call that pretty decisive. And a pretty good definition of winning too. Certainly compared to what Iraq would look like now if we'd followed Obama's advice back in 2007 to cut and run by March of 2008.
The surge was a complete disaster
Ok, I see there really isn't a need to debate you any longer. Statements like that are sure to make even Obama supporters wary of your claims.

Maybe you should go back to worrying about Belgium's politics. And thank God that you don't have to speak German thanks to Americas willingness to liberate oppressed people. Or be ungrateful. I don't care one way or the other.
