joobz
Tergiversator
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2006
- Messages
- 17,998
The joke seems out of character for him. I would be shocked to know that he indeed said it as written.... Yeah, what a fine gentleman.
Intruth, I don't even get the joke.
The joke seems out of character for him. I would be shocked to know that he indeed said it as written.... Yeah, what a fine gentleman.
It's funny how quick you are to dissmiss this due to hearsay and unsubstantiated evidence, yet are so quick to believe WMD in Iraq when there has been NO evidence of such a thing.So I decided to investigate. And found this:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/15/sources-recall-mccains-jo_n_112955.html
Did you get that? The person who originally started this smear by putting the statement in quotes indicating it's a direct quote said "I'm not sure exactly what the wording was of the joke". Who really knows what he actually said given the eagerness of people to hear what they want to hear. Notice that Coile called Torrie Clark's statement a "non-denial denial"? I don't read it that way. But that's what she wants to hear.
Frankly, I'm far more disgusted by the behavior of Democrats in this case than by ANY joke that McCain did OR DID NOT tell. Your party supported Clinton long after we all learned he was probably a SERIAL RAPIST. So if you want to raise this as an issue in this campaign go ahead. I'll be happy to talk about the attitude of Democrats towards rape.
For example, the Democrat supporting women's organization NOW stuck with Clinton even after all the allegations (many proven) that Clinton assaulted, abused and harassed women. In response to the allegation that he committed rape, NOW's president, Patricia Ireland, said those choosing to dwell on Juanita Broaddrick's claims should "stop wasting time on unprovable charges." Keep in mind that the charges were deemed credible by the FBI agents who investigated them and that Schippers (a Democrat, by the way) wrote in his book that if the statute of limitation hadn't expired on the crime he'd have charged Clinton with the rape. He was that convinced by the evidence they had (much of it now unfortunately sealed away from the public eye). Polls showed that the majority of Americans believed Juanita Broaddrick. Yet NOW (a major supporter of the Democrats) advised us to ignore those charges.
Disgusted doesn't even begin to describe my feelings about Democrats and those who NOW claim to be aghast at McCain's ALLEGED joke.
I don't put much stock in unsourced quotes, but have you seen the budgets the last 8 years? The record deficits? The out-of-control spending?to Budget Committee Chairman and fellow GOP Senator Pete Domenici in a Senate budget hearing
Couldn't you find any relating to his Keating Five days?
Funny how that keeps being forgotten. You'd think "massive corruption scandal" would be something to haunt a presidential candidate.
"One of our jobs as elected officials is to help constituents in a proper fashion. ACC is a big employer and important to the local economy. I wouldn't want any special favors for them.... I don't want any part of our conversation to be improper."
"The appearance of it was wrong. It's a wrong appearance when a group of senators appear in a meeting with a group of regulators, because it conveys the impression of undue and improper influence. And it was the wrong thing to do."
"It's a shame that the New York Times has chosen to smear John McCain like this," said Charles R. Black Jr., a top adviser to McCain's current presidential campaign and the head of a Washington lobbying firm called BKSH & Associates. "Neither Senator McCain nor the campaign will dignify false rumors and gossip by responding to them. John McCain has never done favors for anyone, not lobbyists or any special interest. That's a clear 24-year record."
The joke seems out of character for him. I would be shocked to know that he indeed said it as written.
Intruth, I don't even get the joke.
Couldn't you find any relating to his Keating Five days?
Funny how that keeps being forgotten. You'd think "massive corruption scandal" would be something to haunt a presidential candidate.
"I will call right now, my interrogator that tortured me, a gook," McCain said. "(I can't believe that) anybody doesn't believe these interrogators and prison guards were cruel and sadistic people who deserve the worst appellations possible. Gook, is the kindest appellation I can give."
“is not a complicated procedure. It is torture.”
“very exquisite torture.”
The initial combat? When did combat ever end?Thanks for bringing these McCain quotes to everyone's attention. Because with regard to the initial combat with Saddam's military, he was correct in his predictions ... contrary to many of the folks in your party, who were at the time claiming we'd lose the initial combat phase against Saddam's military.
They were SO greeted as liberators by the Iraqis that the war continues up to five years later. Face it, McBush sold the war to the American people by claiming it would be a cakewalk and it turned out to be a catastrophe.And this prediction also turned out to be true. Coalition forces were indeed greeted as liberators by the Iraqi people.
McCain's first visit to Iraq was in August 2003. He kept making ignorant and false statements (about the way the war was fought) up until at least December 2005He wasn't talking about being against the war or invasion. He was talking about the manner in which the war was fought the past 4 years. So here's the question. Did he come back from his first trip and complain about the way the war was being fought and if so, when was that? And what did he recommend at the time?
Decisively winning? What's the definition of victory even?So guess what Peephole. That was exactly the area where General Petraeus was an expert. Counterinsurgency. Soon as we put that type of expert in charge, look at what happened? Soon as Bush demonstrated (via the surge) that we were there to stay, look at what happened? We are now decisively winning. McCain was right ... 4 years ago. And Obama was COMPLETELY WRONG. Then AND now.![]()
I looked at your source for this. It's a rather rabid liberal blogger. One who apparently likes the Clintons and Al Gore. You do know, don't you, that there are credible allegations (not jokes) about Clinton raping and abusing various women over the years? Ever hear of a woman named Broaddrick? You did hear about the exchange between a women and Al Gore concerning the Broaddrick rape allegation, where Gore essentially said it was ok if Clinton raped a women because he was such a great President? This blogger supports those people but objects to a joke? Sheeesh.
Besides, was the joke actually told by McCain? Go to the source link on your blogger's web page and you find this:
So I decided to investigate. And found this:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/15/sources-recall-mccains-jo_n_112955.html
Did you get that? The person who originally started this smear by putting the statement in quotes indicating it's a direct quote said "I'm not sure exactly what the wording was of the joke". Who really knows what he actually said given the eagerness of people to hear what they want to hear. Notice that Coile called Torrie Clark's statement a "non-denial denial"? I don't read it that way. But that's what she wants to hear.
Frankly, I'm far more disgusted by the behavior of Democrats in this case than by ANY joke that McCain did OR DID NOT tell.
Your party supported Clinton long after we all learned he was probably a SERIAL RAPIST...
It's funny how quick you are to dissmiss this due to hearsay and unsubstantiated evidence
yet are so quick to believe WMD in Iraq when there has been NO evidence of such a thing.
Yes. it's circumstantial.Did you even bother to read what the original source of the claimed McCain quote said? Let me repeat that: "I'm not sure exactly what the wording was of the joke".
yes. It's circumstantial.
It's funny how quick you are to dissmiss this due to hearsay and unsubstantiated evidence, yet are so quick to believe WMD in Iraq when there has been NO evidence of such a thing.
McCain:
Quote:
"I hated the gooks. I will hate them as long as I live."
The first quote I have no business commenting on, and neither do you. I think it rather tasteless to get in between a husband and wife spat, except in cases of abuse.Out of character for someone who publically calls his wife a c*nt and jokes about bombing Iran?
The first was stupid, the second is a point has has addressed. I do not fault a POW holding animosity towards his captors. And it seems that "gooks" doesn't mean asians to him.... who jokes that we should ship over some cigarettes to the Iranians to speed up their deaths (I can provide that link, it you'd like)? Who has stated many times that he hates "gooks" (that'd be Asians) and always will?
Seems he's gotten away with murder so far.
Nope. The punch line to that joke isDid you hear the one about the woman who is attacked on the street by a gorilla, beaten senseless, raped repeatedly and left to die? When she finally regains consciousness and tries to speak, her doctor leans over to hear her sigh contently and to feebly ask, ‘Where is that marvelous ape?’ --John McCain 1986
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/07/15/did-you-hear-john-mccains-womanrapegorilla-joke/
I still don't get it.Nope. The punch line to that joke is
She looks at the doctor with a tear in her eye and says:
"He never writes."
I've been telling that joke for nigh on thirty years. It's older than I am, possibly older than my grandfather.
DR
I'm curious, ProbeX ... how do you feel about the rapes by Bill Clinton and the curious circumstances surrounding the death of Ron Brown? Now Bill Clinton is someone who may literally have gotten away with murder. And rape. Were you a supporter of his? Just asking. Call it a hypocrisy litmus test.![]()