John Kerry Regarding WTC7

[Disbelief]

man I thought JDX and ROXDOG were bad, but this LUCAS guy takes the cake as the most childish "Senior" member over at LCF...is he 12 or 14?


TAM

But it is the guys like him, chucksheen and quest (to name a few) who will basically put the final nail in the coffin of the 9/11 truth movement. If LC 4 (whatever number he wants to call it) gets wide play, people will visit that forum and start reading the stupidity that abounds. Mind-controlled assassins, Illuminati, etc. and people will realize that there are a bunch of kooks who frequent the website.

 

[Rrramon]

For the last time! Larry Silverstein would not admit on live television that he ordered a destruction of a building! Just how idiotic are these people?

It really is as simple as that. Their claim is that this man flawlessly executed a conspiracy to sacrifice thousands of Americans in order to collect some insurance money and then casually admitted to it on public television. It is so absurd as to be self-refuting.

 

[uk_dave]

You gotta understand that LUCUS sees himself as a leader.

We've already had his thoughts on how to run the LCF (NO ignore button, that is the road to hell) and how to get your 'truther' video up in the rankings (stay up all night clicking on it) because he has had 150 years in the marketing/webmaster/fearless warrior for truth/BS field and what he says is the 'truth'.

Though he's not going to get his LCF moderator stripe because he's pissed avery off too many times.

 

[ref]

That's no solution. I'll accept that answer, despite its inherent stupidity...

If that's the Idiot Movement's new position, then they accept that WTC 7's collapse was unintentional. Never mind how those mythical explosives got there or why they didn't actually discharge, or why WTC 7 showed obvious signs of deterioration hours before it fell. What's important is that it removes WTC 7 from being part of Their plans.

One down, four to go.

That's no solution indeed, but somehow they always invent a new explanation, once they are shown how stupid their previous theories were. That's like eternal cycle. This explanation does not make any more sense than the previous ones.

 

[ref]

And that does matter, because eventually even the 'truther' itself is going to say "Jeez, do I even believe this **** anymore?"

I sure hope so

 

[uk_dave]

That's no solution indeed, but somehow they always invent a new explanation, once they are shown how stupid their previous theories were. That's like eternal cycle. This explanation does not make any more sense than the previous ones.

But it spirals down onto a new level of stupid.

Like Dantes inferno, the explanation for the 911 ct has many levels, from the 'well maybe they could have acted sooner' to the 'reptoids control mankind and are intent on wiping 80% of us out'.

Between those two notions the 'truthers' are in freefall every time you counter them with a rational, sane argument. Every time you point out the flaws in their fantasy, the lower some of them fall.

It starts with just a few being 'in on it' but as you raise the issue of why the opposition party doesn't investigate, why the media doesn't investigate, why the worlds professionals don't investigate, why the UN doesn't investigate, they fall ever closer to the catch all 'It woz the NWO wot dun it' excuse.

But along the way they lose a few believers.

 

[pomeroo]

Once again, I find myself sputtering in disbelief. Seriously, how can these people feed themselves, dress themselves, and cross streets without getting killed?

Kerry has inside knowledge (and how did he obtain it?) that one of his worst enemies, a man he utterly despises, was complicit in a monstrous and unprecedented crime. He does not use the information to GET HIMSELF ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!!

Really, anyone even slightly above the Ace Baker level of rationality has to pause here.

So, against all obstacles the determined fantasists push on. Aha! Kerry didn't know about the Impossibly Vast Conspiracy in 2004; he just learned about it in one of his briefings with Charlie Sheen and Rosie O'Donnell. Okay, why didn't he reveal his secret in time for the Democrats to win a hundred seats in Congress last fall?

Duh, he just learned about it the other day.

And why aren't ALL the Democrats demanding that Bush be immediately arrested?

We can't consider the possibility that Kerry was confusing building 6 with building 7. That would fall under the heading of plausible explanations. We certainly can't suppose that Kerry might not have had any idea of what he was talking about: that's far too likely.

It goes on and on, with no light at the end of the tunnel.

 

[Horatius]

We can't consider the possibility that Kerry was confusing building 6 with building 7. That would fall under the heading of plausible explanations. We certainly can't suppose that Kerry might not have had any idea of what he was talking about: that's far too likely.

It goes on and on, with no light at the end of the tunnel.

It's the twoofer belief that everybody they confront should know about all the details they consider to be important that continues to amaze me. All the significant head-nodding the LCF crew chortles about is clearly a man who has no idea what the questioner is going on about, thinking to himself, "I've got to act cool, because if I look stupid, this will end up on the news tonight." Just smile and nod, and try to come up with something.

Anyone with the DVDs of TAM5 can see me doing the same thing. The difference is, I could just say, "I have no idea what you're on about" (or some such thing), because I knew I wasn't going to be on national TV for looking dumb.

 

[Gorgonian]

Do you guys giggle a little bit every time you see them casually use "pull" as if it really means what they think it means? I do but then a little vomit follows it up.

 

[David Wong]

Once again, I find myself sputtering in disbelief. Seriously, how can these people feed themselves, dress themselves, and cross streets without getting killed?

Kerry has inside knowledge (and how did he obtain it?) that one of his worst enemies, a man he utterly despises, was complicit in a monstrous and unprecedented crime. He does not use the information to GET HIMSELF ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!!

(snip)

Not to go off-topic, but this is always my response to the "Bush-Diebold hacked voting machines" conspiracy theory. Kerry spends two years and a quarter billion dollars and sacrifices his reputation to try to get into office, and comes within a hair of doing it... then doesn't say a word when "proof" of a Diebold vote machine scam surfaces? You know, the scam that kept him from becoming president? And wasted millions of man-hours of Democrat labor during the campaign? And subverted American democracy forever?

If there was even a whiff of such a scandal, don't you think the DNC would have been screaming bloody murder ten seconds after the last electoral votes were awarded?

I only bring it up because it's sort of the same with all these theories. You have to believe that all of the competition among political factions is just a pro westling-style charade and that the opposing party doesn't really want to get into power at all.

 

[T.A.M.]

Do you guys giggle a little bit every time you see them casually use "pull" as if it really means what they think it means? I do but then a little vomit follows it up.

I find it hard not to giggle at them all the time. If the subject matter were less important, more trivial, I would have to be hospitalized from my laughter...unfortunately, it is serious, and it is not trival.

TAM

 

[FactCheck]

Once again, I find myself sputtering in disbelief. Seriously, how can these people feed themselves, dress themselves, and cross streets without getting killed?

Kerry has inside knowledge (and how did he obtain it?) that one of his worst enemies, a man he utterly despises, was complicit in a monstrous and unprecedented crime. He does not use the information to GET HIMSELF ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!!

Really, anyone even slightly above the Ace Baker level of rationality has to pause here.

So, against all obstacles the determined fantasists push on. Aha! Kerry didn't know about the Impossibly Vast Conspiracy in 2004; he just learned about it in one of his briefings with Charlie Sheen and Rosie O'Donnell. Okay, why didn't he reveal his secret in time for the Democrats to win a hundred seats in Congress last fall?

Duh, he just learned about it the other day.

And why aren't ALL the Democrats demanding that Bush be immediately arrested?

We can't consider the possibility that Kerry was confusing building 6 with building 7. That would fall under the heading of plausible explanations. We certainly can't suppose that Kerry might not have had any idea of what he was talking about: that's far too likely.

It goes on and on, with no light at the end of the tunnel.

There will be another new absurdity every few weeks to keep their web site traffic up. Trust me on this. This is their profession.

 

[stateofgrace]

Once again, I find myself sputtering in disbelief. Seriously, how can these people feed themselves, dress themselves, and cross streets without getting killed?

Kerry has inside knowledge (and how did he obtain it?) that one of his worst enemies, a man he utterly despises, was complicit in a monstrous and unprecedented crime. He does not use the information to GET HIMSELF ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!!

Really, anyone even slightly above the Ace Baker level of rationality has to pause here.

So, against all obstacles the determined fantasists push on. Aha! Kerry didn't know about the Impossibly Vast Conspiracy in 2004; he just learned about it in one of his briefings with Charlie Sheen and Rosie O'Donnell. Okay, why didn't he reveal his secret in time for the Democrats to win a hundred seats in Congress last fall?

Duh, he just learned about it the other day.

And why aren't ALL the Democrats demanding that Bush be immediately arrested?

We can't consider the possibility that Kerry was confusing building 6 with building 7. That would fall under the heading of plausible explanations. We certainly can't suppose that Kerry might not have had any idea of what he was talking about: that's far too likely.

It goes on and on, with no light at the end of the tunnel.

Oh I think Kerry will know all about is soon.

For the Record...
I emailed Kerry - about 20 links to movies/websites/TV Archives too...
so he should have a PHD in 911Truth... so someone nail him the next
time he does a public Q&A...

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7987&st=200

Wow, just wow, like you say it goes on and on and on and....................

 

[pomeroo]

The drooling morons at 911blogger.com are outdoing themselves on this one. They are tumbling ass-over-heels to find some way, some remotely conceivable way, of making Kerry an accomplice to the monstrous crime committed by his hated enemy.

Twoofers spend all their time trying to pound square pegs into round holes, and they never get beyond demanding a bigger hammer.

 

[332nd]

For the Record...
I emailed Kerry - about 20 links to movies/websites/TV Archives too...
so he should have a PHD in 911Truth... so someone nail him the next
time he does a public Q&A...

The old joke about "Piled Higher and Deeper" was never more apt.

 

[Dog Town]

<snip>

Twoofers spend all their time trying to pound square pegs into round holes, and they never get beyond demanding a bigger hammer.

True!

 

[beachnut]

Kerry missed every single question. Why?

Kerry has no idea there are a bunch of nuts running around. The fact less few of the 9/11 truth movement, they are a few nuts, just a fringe group. If Kerry finds out what they are really saying, he would/should call them idiots. Why? Because truther get upset when you call them liars.

Truthers need to find some facts. So why do we talk about 9/11? Maybe one real person on the fence will fall on the correct side and not fall for lies on 9/11. (not to be confused with the dolts who say they are on the fence and then go truther nuts)

 

[The Doc]

The truthers will always find a way to match any minor vocal mishap as a way to suit their story. Even if it is logically retarded.

 

[T.A.M.]

The drooling morons at 911blogger.com are outdoing themselves on this one. They are tumbling ass-over-heels to find some way, some remotely conceivable way, of making Kerry an accomplice to the monstrous crime committed by his hated enemy.

Twoofers spend all their time trying to pound square pegs into round holes, and they never get beyond demanding a bigger hammer.

Well if they cant get the hammer they want, they could merely ask one of us to use our heads. God know we get enough practice with them, doing this...



TAM

 

[Totovader]

I can't believe people are trying to make this claim- it doesn't even make ANY SENSE. (Ok, I guess I can believe it).

I got a denier a few minutes ago trying to pass off this garbage:

Toto- John Kerry recently stated that he was aware that WTC7 was intentionally brought down in a controlled fashion. This reminds me again of my challenge answer. Show me a scientific study for the cause of the WTC7 global collapse that does not involve demolitions.

Ugh, how they weasel it in... sometimes all I can do is roll my eyes.

Here is the link to the video of John Kerry stating that WTC7 was brought down in a controlled fashion.

jonesreportdotcom
It has everything to do with the topic, since the official story has always been that NO demolitions were used on 911.

link

Just absolutely nuts...