John Kerry Regarding WTC7

ummm NIST Interim Report on WTC7. No use of demolitions in that one...explains a very plausible, and most likely theory for collapse of WTC7.

TAM:)
 
Its amazing to see the 9-11 deniars get their panties all wound up over this useless, meaningless video. now they will be saying:

"john kerry admits wtc 7 was brought down by controlled demo"

oy vey. when they will grow up. their little movement is sooo meaningless.
 
parky76 said:
Its amazing to see the 9-11 deniars get their panties all wound up over this useless, meaningless video. now they will be saying:

"john kerry admits wtc 7 was brought down by controlled demo"

oy vey. when they will grow up. their little movement is sooo meaningless.
Click to expand...

True. The problem with this is the way the fact that they state it as if it is fact. If someone uneducated on the issues hears "Larry Silverstein, the buildings owner, and John Kerry both admit the building was brought down in a controlled demolition"... it's obviously going to sound convincing.

... from the king of vocal mishaps to boot... :)
Click to expand...

I'm lost lol. I'd have to surrender and say I don't get it :(
 
Well, I have faith that someday in the coming years, enough people will have heard about these nutty theories that the most common answer to these question will be

"I've heard about these theories before, and I think they are pretty stupid. And that's all I'm gonna say."
 
The Doc said:
I'm lost lol. I'd have to surrender and say I don't get it :(
Click to expand...

John Kerry said:
I voted for it before I voted against it.
Click to expand...

John Kerry said:
You know, education — if you make the most of it, you study hard and you do your homework and you make an effort to be smart, you can do well. If you don’t, you get stuck in Iraq.
Click to expand...

It's a lot funnier if you get the joke... now I just feel like a politico...
 
parky76 said:
Well, I have faith that someday in the coming years, enough people will have heard about these nutty theories that the most common answer to these question will be

"I've heard about these theories before, and I think they are pretty stupid. And that's all I'm gonna say."
Click to expand...

I find it a little odd that there were so many Deniers at this little book club thing, though...

I bet Kerry was in a situation where he felt like he couldn't just come out and say "I have no idea what you're talking about" (although it looks like he tried).

Amazing how the conspiracists just ignore that part flat out.
 
It was a trap plain and simple, look at the question. The questioner started out telling him that WTC 7 was demolished and that Silverstein had already admited it, since by his own admission, that was all Kerry knew about it, why wouldn't he agree with the information he'd just been given.
 
PhantomWolf said:
It was a trap plain and simple, look at the question. The questioner started out telling him that WTC 7 was demolished and that Silverstein had already admited it, since by his own admission, that was all Kerry knew about it, why wouldn't he agree with the information he'd just been given.
Click to expand...

Exactly.
 
What I wanna know is.....who's the moron who came up with the WTC7 demolition plan?

First they decide to blow up WTC7 at 5:20pm, when all the dust and smoke has settled.

Then they sent a press release to CNN and BBC annoucing the demolition and both read it too early, giving away the plot.

Then they let Silverstein blow the whole thing on TV!

Then they also decide to let John Kerry in on the secret and he also shoots of his mouth, again exposing the deed.

Have twoofers really thought about just how absurd this scenario is?

I guess not.
 
CHF said:
What I wanna know is.....who's the moron who came up with the WTC7 demolition plan?

First they decide to blow up WTC7 at 5:20pm, when all the dust and smoke has settled.

Then they sent a press release to CNN and BBC annoucing the demolition and both read it too early, again giving away the plot.

Then they let Silverstein blow the whole thing on TV!

Then they also decide to let John Kerry in on the secret and he also shoots of his mouth and annouces the evil deed.

Have twoofers really thought about just how absurd this scenario is?

I guess not.
Click to expand...

Plus, I've heard truthers speculate that WTC 7 was the target of United 93. There it was, all wired up, and the passengers tried to take over, necessitating a shoot down over Pennsylvania. Now how do they drop that building?

Well, the obvious time to do it would have been a half hour later, when WTC 1 falls into it. Instead, the goofy maniacal geniuses just sit and twiddle their thumbs for seven hours more.

Literally, the fall of WTC 7 would have been the last bit of business on their plate. And yet they just let that building burn with all that explosive in it. Gah.
 
pomeroo said:
It goes on and on, with no light at the end of the tunnel.
Click to expand...
The reason there is no light in their tunnel is the nature of their tunnel. It bends a few times, connects to a smaller tunnel, which also bends, and thence to a stomach, and finally past that to another tunnel that ends up with the rest of their head, closed at the mouth due to the tight fit of that end of the tunnel being wedged into the opening of the tunnel they are trying to gaze through.

Until they pull their heads out, they are consigned to permanent darkness.

How they read computer screens, and type on keyboards, while in this geometry confounds me.

;)

DR
 
Darth Rotor said:
The reason there is no light in their tunnel is the nature of their tunnel. It bends a few times, connects to a smaller tunnel, which also bends, and thence to a stomach, and finally past that to another tunnel that ends up with the rest of their head, closed at the mouth due to the tight fit of that end of the tunnel being wedged into the opening of the tunnel they are trying to gaze through.

Until they pull their heads out, they are consigned to permanent darkness.

How they read computer screens, and type on keyboards, while in this geometry confounds me.

;)

DR
Click to expand...
Ah! So THAT'S what they mean by "rabbit hole"! :yikes:
 
Before the troothers came to be the word "MOVEMENT" meant something very specific to me...and now....

oh...nevermind...it still means the same thing.
 
This whole incident is just more evidence for the underlying Perry Mason nature of the 9/11 truth movement. Yes, I know that reference dates me.
 
Somebody called John Kerry's office:

On various political lists that I am on, this article has been circulated around in which Senator John F. Kerry stated that Building 7 was deliberately demolished. Instead of taking that article on face value, I went straight to the horse’s mouth so to speak. I called up Senator Kerry’s office and an aid that I spoke with knew of this article being circulated and he flat out told me that Senator Kerry never opined or stated that Building 7 was deliberately demolished. What he said was that “one wall had to be taken down” He never said that the whole building was intentionally brought down by a controlled demolition.



In circulating that verification response coming from the senator’s aid, I invited others to phone the senator’s office to hear exactly what I heard. In fact, should you wish to call the senator’s office, here is the number, (202) 224-2742. In listening to his aid he sounded angry. Who can blame him when the article misconstrued the words of the Senator according to his aid? I also told him of certain articles making their way around the Internet that the government was behind the shootings at Virginia Tech and if you could hear the reaction of Senator Kerry’s aid, he was equally angered over that one.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom