Status
Not open for further replies.
Were there previous charges against the McMichaels listed in that article ?
I'll admit I skimmed it, but I didn't see any criminal "record" posted there.

Current "criminality" yes, past no.
 
Were there previous charges against the McMichaels listed in that article ?
I'll admit I skimmed it, but I didn't see any criminal "record" posted there.

Current "criminality" yes, past no.

I'm operating under the premise that an arrest constitutes proof of a criminal nature*. It then follows that the McMichaels are far more diabolical than Arbery, thus undercutting the arguments of McMichaels' defenders.

*Of course, I know that this premise is false. I'm just establishing a principle.
 
You misunderstood what I was responding to. ITTL was saying there was "nothing to support that belief, that McMichael wanted to shoot him".

My point was that it didn't make much difference if he did or not, his actions were the same and led to the same result.
And regardless of your intent in writing that statement, you highlighted the malice aforethought that ITTL claims is lacking.
 
I am not sure why that is a narrative collapse.

He was not "jogging while black." The video shows him "trespassing while black", "fleeing while black", "trying to steal a shotgun while black" and "punching a white dude while black."

But "jogging while black" is just another fake narrative created by the Left.

Have I got that right? Or, at least, alt-right?

Yes, the Alt-right is merely empiricism applied to politics.


He was a good boy who dindu nuffin.

Interesting, the Guardian edited the 2017 video where they tried to tase Arbery to remove aggressive threats he made toward the cops:

The Guardian is a newspaper for the brain-dead lobotomized zombies that inhabit the political Left.

It has actually been a profoundly unpleasant worldview to adopt. It is not a source of encouragement or hope, and I have wished sometimes I could return to ignorance.

Nope, it is the worldview that practically every person in history had up until a few decades ago. You can read Western literature or Eastern literature and you'll not find any inkling of politically correct thought. Political Correctness, Wokeness, and the Cult of Diversity were only made possible by mass media propaganda and mass indoctrination in public education over the latter half of the 20th century till the present day.

I'm operating under the premise that an arrest constitutes proof of a criminal nature*. It then follows that the McMichaels are far more diabolical than Arbery, thus undercutting the arguments of McMichaels' defenders.

But trying to steal someone's shotgun while punching someone in the face does not constitute a criminal nature. Note: On the video we see Ahmaud Arbery throwing punches at Travis and hitting him, but we don't see Travis throwing punches at Ahmaud.
 
But trying to steal someone's shotgun while punching someone in the face does not constitute a criminal nature. Note: On the video we see Ahmaud Arbery throwing punches at Travis and hitting him, but we don't see Travis throwing punches at Ahmaud.

Not that it is incredibly important, but by the time Arbery throws the first punch, he had already been shot.
 
But trying to steal someone's shotgun while punching someone in the face does not constitute a criminal nature. Note: On the video we see Ahmaud Arbery throwing punches at Travis and hitting him, but we don't see Travis throwing punches at Ahmaud.

He's carrying a shotgun,why would he release it to punch someone when he can just keep shooting them?

You may also note that assaulting someone with a shotgun is a criminal offence.
 
....But trying to steal someone's shotgun while punching someone in the face does not constitute a criminal nature. Note: On the video we see Ahmaud Arbery throwing punches at Travis and hitting him, but we don't see Travis throwing punches at Ahmaud.

Your post is most bizarre. You don't see Travis finger on the trigger. You don't see Travis shoot him three times.

The GBI saw Travis on the video and charged him with murder whether or not you are blind.
 
The Guardian is a newspaper for the brain-dead lobotomized zombies that inhabit the political Left.

I manage to cope with the Guardian, the Daily Mail, the Daily Telegraph and International Skeptics, sometimes all on the same day. Edit: and the Spectator. Never knew I was a lobotomized leftie zombie, although I did have a head injury in 1989 - maybe that's what you're on about.
 
Last edited:
Forgive me if I don't want to poison my recommendation algorithm with something suggested by a racist.

I watched it so that you don't have to. More correctly, I watched a few seconds of the video. Arbery is being blamed for being dumb because he attacked a guy with a gun. They then go on to talk about historical revisionism. Nope, you couldn't make it up.
 
He was not "jogging while black." The video shows him "trespassing while black", "fleeing while black", "trying to steal a shotgun while black" and "punching a white dude while black."

But "jogging while black" is just another fake narrative created by the Left.

Okay, Mr. "Darkies Never Clean their own Neighborhoods", whatever you say. Now, can you toss in a brazen racial slur for us?

He was a good boy who dindu nuffin.

Very good! Now that you've thrown your mask to the ground and jumped up and down on it, everyone who doesn't want to talk to racists can safely ignore you.
 
Last edited:
I watched it so that you don't have to. More correctly, I watched a few seconds of the video. Arbery is being blamed for being dumb because he attacked a guy with a gun. They then go on to talk about historical revisionism. Nope, you couldn't make it up.

Couldn't resist:
James Hodson
1 second ago
The Guardian couldn't give a **** about strong language. Read the **** below the line, you idiotic, racialist tosser. Incidentally, it's 'civilly'. We real anglo-Saxons can speak the language properly.

Potato = JH
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom