That's right. Keep running away from situations you cannot control.
That's right. Keep running away from situations you cannot control.
No need to controll anything.
Angel soon found out that he was not in the same class as Houdini and was not up to the task of dealing with Callahan on live television.
No need to controll anything.
Personal insults?
What are you talking about?
I make very specific claims on my site.
Looks like Angel was dealing with a cheesy Vegas sideshow act with a temper parading as a medium. Looked like he was pretty ready for it to me but I'll let others make up their mind after seeing it for themselves:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roaLgL7adl4
Great, we're making progress. Since you have no need to control anything then you'll glady submit to a test not of your own design, right?
I have to agree with Criss Angel about Callahan: "Blah Blah Blah What a Joke Blah Blah Blah..."
Sure once you work out a protocall and we both agree on it why not.
Jim
I still find it amazing you people still think it was real.
*Hint the test was but nothing else.![]()
I still find it amazing you people still think it was real.
How about I write my father's name on a piece of paper, get an envelope, and some salt. I take a picture of it also and pm it to someone here. I'll put the name and some salt in the envelope. You take the same amount of time you did on Phenomenom and let us know.
How does that sound?
Generate a SHA-1 hash of the picture file and post it somewhere online before the test. That way when you eventually reveal the picture itself everyone can verify you didn't switch images.
I still find it amazing you people still think it was real.
*Hint the test was but nothing else.
-Jim
Please. The only thing real in that episode was Angel's reaction, and his assessment of you. The rest was just the usual television smoke and mirrors and some really bad acting on your part. "Comical", as Angel put it.
And to think criticaly about what you saw and could check out scare you does it not.
Or at least some part of you.
Becouse to do so would prove your postion to be based upon intellectual fraud.
I am am correct am I not?
Jim
Simply put, no. You are are not.
(And I'd think that Raymond Hill might have "told" you that it is "wheels", not "weels".)