Merged Jim Callahan's MDC claim

Status
Not open for further replies.
Personal insults?

What are you talking about?

I'm talking about your response to Chris Angel. I'm talking about your responses to people here than have been removed from threads for violating the rules. You have a habit of attacking people when you cannot attack their arguments.

I make very specific claims on my site.

Then by all means, please share with us some material from your website that describes what you do in terms that are unambiguous and testable.
 
Sure once you work out a protocall and we both agree on it why not.

Jim

How about I write my father's name on a piece of paper, get an envelope, and some salt. I take a picture of it also and pm it to someone here. I'll put the name and some salt in the envelope. You take the same amount of time you did on Phenomenom and let us know.

How does that sound?
 
How about I write my father's name on a piece of paper, get an envelope, and some salt. I take a picture of it also and pm it to someone here. I'll put the name and some salt in the envelope. You take the same amount of time you did on Phenomenom and let us know.

How does that sound?

Generate a SHA-1 hash of the picture file and post it somewhere online before the test. That way when you eventually reveal the picture itself everyone can verify you didn't switch images.
 
Generate a SHA-1 hash of the picture file and post it somewhere online before the test. That way when you eventually reveal the picture itself everyone can verify you didn't switch images.

I'm not sure what a SHA-1 hash is. But if that is better than PMing someone the photo, I will do that.

What do you say, Jim? Got the salt and the envelope and everything. You and Raymond should have no trouble. If you were willing to take Angel's challenge, this should be a breeze.
 
I wonder what will happen now?

Jim disappears from the discussion

or,

Jim explains that these things can't be done on demand (the TV performance notwithstanding)

or,

Jim states that he doesn't have to prove anything to anybody

or,

Jim explains that Raymond will not cooperate for people who do not believe in him

or,

Jim successfully contacts Raymond who gives him the name in the envelope.

Some of these outcomes seem more likely than others.
 
I still find it amazing you people still think it was real.
*Hint the test was but nothing else.:D


-Jim

Please. The only thing real in that episode was Angel's reaction, and his assessment of you. The rest was just the usual television smoke and mirrors and some really bad acting on your part. "Comical", as Angel put it.
 
Please. The only thing real in that episode was Angel's reaction, and his assessment of you. The rest was just the usual television smoke and mirrors and some really bad acting on your part. "Comical", as Angel put it.

And to think criticaly about what you saw and could check out scare you does it not.

Or at least some part of you.
Becouse to do so would prove your postion to be based upon intellectual fraud.

I am am correct am I not?

Jim
 
And to think criticaly about what you saw and could check out scare you does it not.

Or at least some part of you.
Becouse to do so would prove your postion to be based upon intellectual fraud.

I am am correct am I not?

Jim

Simply put, no. You are are not.

(And I'd think that Raymond Hill might have "told" you that it is "wheels", not "weels".)
 
Last edited:
Simply put, no. You are are not.

(And I'd think that Raymond Hill might have "told" you that it is "wheels", not "weels".)

Yep and it has one extra letter.

He also used the number 4 instead of spelling it out.

All comes down to time baby and planting reasons for interaction.

You ever read Virus of the Mind.
(Now you guys have been given a gaint clue)

Jim
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom