No, Shaw was not CIA. He was a member of the CIA.
Also what did he say, exactly, that you believe was a lie and on what evidence do you base that?
Sounds like the CIA received intelligence that Oswald had been in Mexico but discovered that it was not so. Hardly surprising, they probably received intelligence suggesting he had been in all manner of places, again illustrating the unreliability of eye witnesses.
The CIA was mistaken about Oswald being in Mexico, thus conspiracy? Does that sum up your argument right?
Two men in the same line of work worked together years earlier, thus conspiracy? And that doesn't sound silly to you?
Texas is traditionally a conservative state so I don't see how Byrd's right-leaning tendencies are in any way suspicious or even remotely relevant.
How exactly does a building have any kind of political affiliation? It's a building for the love of Altana!
What you wrote is untrue because the print was a latent, which could only have been generated while Oswald was still alive.
Untrue.
Begging the question.
A bit too early to be doing your victory laps, Jetblast.