• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Jestblaze's Thoughts

if any new element comes from my processes maybe element 168 I want to known to name it orichalchum
 
jestblaze said:
Not sure where this thread belongs but lets say it was possible to melt both polar icecaps and all of antarctica and change the waper vapor into breathable atmosphere would the exteremly less denseness of it extend the atmosphere of earth around the moon and assuming we could take whatever ozone was needed fro the atmosphere from cities could we still keep a stable environment? wierd huh
sorry i didn't realize this was already brought up. The only reason i thought of it was i thought of a spiked slotted outer shell ball with a gyroscopically balanced inner shell containing a gyroscope a hydrogen furnace leaded to a directed output for thrust with a turbine on it to get back some of the energy, solar panels for supplemental energy, a battery, a reservoir for electrolisys for the melted water. everyone is physicist here so you all know the idea is flawed in what it produces and as much as people laugh at this idea its not meant to be humor
Click to expand...

heres a counter question for you, when you get it right you should be able to figure out why your idea won't work

how far is it roughly from the earth to the moon
1) 4 kilometres
2) 4000 kilometres
3) 400,000 kilometres

The distance between the Moon and the Earth varies from around 356,400 km to 406,700 km

;)
 
Sigh... ignorant troll... orichalcum already exists.

It's a type of golden colored bronze alloy used by Romans to make certain coins.

If you mean the one from "Atlantis"... it was likely something similar, if it was anything at all. There were a number of sources that mentioned orichalcum and the word in Greek means "mountain copper".
 
Hmmmm, maybe there is something to this moon colonization. Obviously, it is too early to send humans. May I suggest sending kittens to the moon?
 

Attachments

  • funny-captions-moon-cats.jpg
    funny-captions-moon-cats.jpg
    64.3 KB · Views: 16
oh yes we should populate the bottom of the ocean - or just start stacking cities on cities.... though the moon would have some pretty awesome views :P
 
i also heard recently that nationalities are starting to try and buy up areas of the moon. I think China may have dibs on a good part of it already!
 
jestblaze said:
telepathic thought
in quantum entanglement of matter
all photons for every like charged ions/elements hold the same constant for every atom in that their resultant of each and the total of quantum position * quantum velocity is exactly the same
so if able to entangle using that respect every adjoining similar atom of an element can be simultaneously entangled
Click to expand...


The jade monkey is in the glove compartment.
 
Ziggurat, I appreciate the reply, but I’m really trying to understand this (at a layman’s level) and the terse responses leave me confused. I am not a physicist, nor a mathematician, but I find the question intriguing and would like to understand it as best as I can.

Ziggurat said:
No. n = 1 for a vacuum.
Click to expand...
I guess I don’t understand the terminology. If refraction is n and n=1, what does that mean? What would n be for a refraction that causes an infinite wavelength?

Ziggurat said:
An absolute vacuum with no light in it would be at zero K, but zero K doesn't mean an absolute vacuum.
Click to expand...
I must be missing something obvious, but I don’t get it. If we have zero K, we either have a vacuum with no light or…what?
 
Last edited:
jestblaze said:
telepathic thought
in quantum entanglement of matter
all photons for every like charged ions/elements hold the same constant for every atom in that their resultant of each and the total of quantum position * quantum velocity is exactly the same
so if able to entangle using that respect every adjoining similar atom of an element can be simultaneously entangled
Click to expand...

Speaking of telepathic thought, you'll see upthread that I very kindly outlined a very simple way you could make yourself $1,000,000 by demonstrating the ability that you claim is "proven". Why are you ignoring this? Do you not want $1,000,000?
 
DevilsAdvocate said:
I guess I don’t understand the terminology. If refraction is n and n=1, what does that mean?
Click to expand...

n=1 means light travels at the same speed in whatever medium you're considering that it travels in a vacuum. So the vacuum index of refraction is always 1 by definition. n=2 means that light travels half as fast, etc.

What would n be for a refraction that causes an infinite wavelength?
Click to expand...

You would need n=0, which would mean an infinite speed. Which would violate relativity.

I must be missing something obvious, but I don’t get it. If we have zero K, we either have a vacuum with no light or…what?
Click to expand...

A system in its lowest possible entropy state, which means no thermal fluctuations. In the case of a vacuum, you can think about light as being a thermal fluctuation of the vacuum, and you can even assign it a temperature (the black body temperature). You don't need a vacuum for zero K, you can still have that in the presence of matter, if the matter does not have any thermal fluctuations.
 
jestblaze said:
Land is in short supply and life expectancy rates are climbing dramatically and will continue to do so with upcoming advances in biotechnologies and pharmaceuticals. Its time to discuss how we can expand and the moon is the closest. My first idea is simple, a biodome like structure planted permanently on the moon. We could even crash the iss into it for it if we really wanted but that was built so fast with international support i'm sure a moon base could be developed in ten or so years. Now a wacky idea I had for colonizing the moon involved melting both ice caps completely and turning the water vapor into breathable atmosphere. The goal of this is to extend the atmosphere of the Earth so far it wraps around the moon, what I believe is the only way to get the moon to hold a full atmosphere. I'm unsure of the distance to atmospheric expansion ratio but just thought we could also lower the sea level using some of the oceans to supplement this project and extend it enough. What are your ideas for the moon?
Click to expand...

You should think things through before posting them on a public forum. The above is complete nonsense.
 
jestblaze said:
Land is in short supply and life expectancy rates are climbing dramatically and will continue to do so with upcoming advances in biotechnologies and pharmaceuticals. Its time to discuss how we can expand and the moon is the closest. My first idea is simple, a biodome like structure planted permanently on the moon. We could even crash the iss into it for it if we really wanted but that was built so fast with international support i'm sure a moon base could be developed in ten or so years. Now a wacky idea I had for colonizing the moon involved melting both ice caps completely and turning the water vapor into breathable atmosphere. The goal of this is to extend the atmosphere of the Earth so far it wraps around the moon, what I believe is the only way to get the moon to hold a full atmosphere. I'm unsure of the distance to atmospheric expansion ratio but just thought we could also lower the sea level using some of the oceans to supplement this project and extend it enough. What are your ideas for the moon?
Click to expand...

Why would the water vapor expand the Earth's atmosphere?
 
jestblaze said:
Not sure where this thread belongs but lets say it was possible to melt both polar icecaps and all of antarctica and change the waper vapor into breathable atmosphere would the exteremly less denseness of it extend the atmosphere of earth around the moon and assuming we could take whatever ozone was needed fro the atmosphere from cities could we still keep a stable environment? wierd huh
Click to expand...
We went over this already. Pick up an apple. The apple is the earth, OK? The skin on the apple is the oceans, icecaps and atmosphere. Seriously, that's just about how thin the biosphere is. Now pick up a grape in the other hand. That grape's the moon. Now hold the two fruit as far apart as you can. OK? Your "plan" is somehow to magically expand the appleskin into a vast sphere that's so large it encompasses the grape. That's how dumb the idea is. Do you see?

The thin layer of atmosphere we have is all the earth's gravity can cling onto, assisted by our planet's magnetic field which helps stop the solar wind stripping it away. Even if there was a magical way to expand our atmosphere further up into space, it would just blow away.

The only reason i thought of it was i thought of a spiked slotted outer shell ball with a gyroscopically balanced inner shell containing a gyroscope a hydrogen furnace leaded to a directed output for thrust with a turbine on it to get back some of the energy, solar panels for supplemental energy, a battery, a reservoir for electrolisys for the melted water. everyone is physicist here so you all know the idea is flawed in what it produces and as much as people laugh at this idea its not meant to be humor
Click to expand...

Umm. Maybe you could draw us a picture.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom