• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Jestblaze's Thoughts

Im sorry if you feel lied to.
None of my ideas to help make you telepathic work, again. Well I might as well tell you the true way. You have to do something radical intense and loving the spurs forward nature acknowledging you.... my radical thing was huffing a healthy seed, radical as in radical love
 
I’m sorry if you feel having an orgasm made you telepathic.

Radical love? What exactly is involved in that? No need to go into graphic detail just a list of the material requirements would probably suffice to give us the underling theme.
 
So first i'm sorry if you don't understand this post iit contradicts everything i've shown so far my scientific backround is barely basic, high school physics and biology, a calc class for math and i know my theories are probably **** but i figured post them anyway maybe one isn't as bad as i don't show i truely believe and maybe even someone will post something showing they think there is a possiblity of something coming from it also this applys to my telepathy yes i did everything i said no i don't actually believe i'm telepathic i believe i once heard a message i thought was telepathic and have decided if it is possible to become teleapthic for me or more importantly anyone else it would be a great scientific achievement but i have had a few successes in small telepathic experiments with people in chat rooms while i can't find a reason they would lie to me i still don't believe i was actually successful past the point of normal intuition but just because i like to stay consistent i'll do one thing to attempt to try i'm guessing there is about 90 people who work for jref with about 2 interns thats the worst proof i can think but how the hell would you expect me to even attempt to prove i may or may not be telepathic for any reason through a forum anyone who said prove it is a moron because they net showed me the controlled method they wanted me to prove it and i don't think i know any on the forums i doubt i'll read anyy replys to this none of you who posted in this thread are honorable scientists VFMA motto CIA creed SAE :)
 
Ladewig said:
Complexity said:
Shooting fish in a barrel is more of a challenge than this.
Click to expand...

Hell, dynamiting fish in a barrel is more challenging.
Click to expand...
Shooting is damn challenging, unless you are using a bullet only a few millimeters lesser diameter than the barrel and shoot straight in (which imo would also be a challenge).

Dynamiting; very easy. Cooking the results, challenging.
 
Am I the only person feeling uncomfortable with the direction of this thread?

Jestblaze, have you considered any professional help?
 
dasmiller said:
If we printed out the entire thread, fed the printout through a shredder, sprinkled the confetti into the Niagara river, recorded the roar of the Falls as the confetti went over, digitized the recorded sounds into a low-rate .wav file, randomly shuffled the bits of the file, and then played it backwards, I'm not sure it would be any less coherent.
Click to expand...

Nominated.

That was funny as hell. :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom