• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Jestblaze's Thoughts

jestblaze said:
so if my calculations are correct... lK * C = aS and velocity is relative.
0.00000000000001K * 299792458 m/s = 0.00000299792458 m/s
I think there is a relationship and it should be a direct relationship but based on the math believe there is a missing constant that is an exponential of 10.
Click to expand...

You cannot do legitimate calculations without a legitimate formula to work from. When you show how you drived your formula AND how you can prove the derivation/formula are consistent with known/tested/verified real world data, then you might have a chance of proving something. So far, not so much.
 
dafydd said:
So the speed of absolute zero is 0.00000299792458 m/s? There's a Nobel prize in this.
Click to expand...




I believe he means the (edit to change to) slowest motion (or, maybe, acceleration*) is that number @ 0 kelvins.


*since m/s is velocity (actually speed as you noted as he doesn't know what his direction is). As I read this anyway.
 
Last edited:
WhatRoughBeast said:
I thought is was "Hanging on in quiet desperation".
Click to expand...

Isn't that Henry Thoreaux? 'Most men lead lives of quiet desperation and go to the grave with the song still in them.' Roger Waters stole it. Anyway, Waters said it was the English way and I'm half Scottish and half Welsh.
 
Last edited:
fuelair said:
I believe he means the fastest motion (or, maybe, acceleration*) is that number @ 0 kelvins.


*since m/s is velocity (actually speed as you noted as he doesn't know what his direction is). As I read this anyway.
Click to expand...

I know almost nothing about this but surely if you gave an atom at absolute zero a nudge it would accelerate in proportion to the power of the nudge. Or would it heat up and accelerate?
 
jestblaze said:
so if my calculations are correct... lK * C = aS and velocity is relative.
0.00000000000001K * 299792458 m/s = 0.00000299792458 m/s
I think there is a relationship and it should be a direct relationship but based on the math believe there is a missing constant that is an exponential of 10.
Click to expand...

Your calculations are wrong.

Ignore the numbers and just look at the units:

k * (m/s) = (m/s)

The left side is in fact not equal to the right side, therefore the calculation is wrong.
 
dafydd said:
I know almost nothing about this but surely if you gave an atom at absolute zero a nudge it would accelerate in proportion to the power of the nudge. Or would it heat up and accelerate?
Click to expand...
motion is heat/heat is motion - but, yes. The motion it can't make at 0K is of it's own parts. And you could not survive for any real time in a Universe @ 0K to push an atom.
 
right so this experiment can technically be done without any telepathy
i realized the only thing i need to explain more is the fusion process.
i've realized i was wrong in it and it needs to be looked into.
Any critics want to suggest an idea or thread for cold fusion?
 
jestblaze said:
Ok I have been told I'm spreading my threads out too much and I don't want to upset any of the children so I'll post this non telepathic idea here. It may be also in another one of my threads, I'm sorry I'm not checking. The human brain consists of chemicals used to create electrical signals between cells. The patterns of these electrical signals is the basis for human thoughts. One estimate i found theorized there are about 100 billion neurons in the human mind.
Plant cells communicate with each other through electric signals. Think now how many plant cells there are versus neurons in humans as well as how long the various plant cells have had to form, maybe coincidentally, the proper patterns formed in the human mind for thought and draw any conclusions you want.
Click to expand...


The only reasonable conclusion is Ents.

Now what?
 
jestblaze said:
So I've thought a bit more on the subject
Click to expand...

Stop. Before you go "thinking" about the subject, you need to learn something, and start paying attention to explanations that are given to you.

and now believe with a little research that we can in scientific labs get down to .001pK degrees. This is not low enough

Both the figure and the judgment are unsupported, and irrelevant.

so I came up with the idea that quantum entanglement of the radioactive element

Radioactivity and quantum entanglement are unrelated concepts.

at the lowest temperature

Again, radioactivity is not a function of temperature.

then suggestion of it slowing down subatomically

Gibberish. Temperature is a function of atomic motion.

could possibly get us to a temperature lower than the accuracy of the termometers <.000001pK est> That should be low enough

How? Why? Actually, never mind.

Also i thought about the atomic structure of elements and what would make the most stable element when fused and decided Polonium has the appropriate structure.

No. Polonium has no stable isotopes.

Finally I thought an absurd theory

No. You do not have a theory. You have random speculation that has nothing to do with reality.

that altering the perspective of motionlessness of half the sample into the other

Gibberish.

could create a cold fusion.

No, it couldn't.

Instead of bashing me ask me to explain what you don't.

Nothing you have said in this thread makes any sense whatsoever, nor bears the slightest resemblance to physical reality. Some of us, myself included, have attempted to explain some of your basic conceptual errors. But you have ignored attempts to help you. As you don't seem interested in learning or engaging, I can't see spending any more time trying.

Oh and lastly my other thread on telepathic physics might help to explain a few things.

Unfortunately, you may be right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom