"Jersey Girls"

johnny karate said:
Yeah, I'm not sure what you're trying to say here...

But I'm pretty sure you completely ignored my questions:
Click to expand...

why do you pull the "silent masses" on your side?
when you look at polls, you can clearly see that most ppl think they did not get told the full truth. and still , those wo actively protest and demand re investigations seem to be a minority. why are you so sure to know what those family members think, those that did not go public, not pro nor contra.
just cuase they dont go public doesnt mean that they are not supporting it nor does it mean they are against it.

i think the effort of the victims fam. members, no mather how many, is important. so many "debunkers" on the internet and media, that debunk all kind of theorys about 9/11. ppl that actively form a contra to the "trith movement" how many of victims fam. have, active and public, joined that contra to the "truth movement" ?
 
Dictator Cheney said:
why do you pull the "silent masses" on your side?
when you look at polls, you can clearly see that most ppl think they did not get told the full truth. and still , those wo actively protest and demand re investigations seem to be a minority. why are you so sure to know what those family members think, those that did not go public, not pro nor contra.
just cuase they dont go public doesnt mean that they are not supporting it nor does it mean they are against it.

i think the effort of the victims fam. members, no mather how many, is important. so many "debunkers" on the internet and media, that debunk all kind of theorys about 9/11. ppl that actively form a contra to the "trith movement" how many of victims fam. have, active and public, joined that contra to the "truth movement" ?
Click to expand...

Nice tap dance around my question.

Fact: Out of tens of thousands of victims' family members only a couple of dozen or so are "asking questions" or "demanding a new investigation".

The question to you is: Why should the opinions of an extreme minority be given any special consideration?
 
Yeah DC we' too will just sit here and pretend that the majority of victims families all feel the same way as the Jersey girls but don't bother to participate with them. Just like the majority of the world thinks 9/11 was an inside job yet only about 20 people in the world at a time bother to show up to rallies.

Gosh, can't figure out why people put the silent majority as not being on the twoofer side. I have a bit more respect for the flat earth society. Not because they have bigger numbers than twoofers, but because they at least are honest with themselves and don't spend the majority of their time trying to convince people they are larger and more popular than they really are. And they don't dance around 100 variations of the same theory so as to sound like a parrot saying "I never claimed that".
 
gumboot said:
Yes. We've discussed their false claims numerous times on these forums. Learn to use the search function.
Click to expand...

Pressfor911truth is "theyr" docu, never saw a "debunking" to it, searchfunction did not bring up a single hit.
 
johnny karate said:
Nice tap dance around my question.

Fact: Out of tens of thousands of victims' family members only a couple of dozen or so are "asking questions" or "demanding a new investigation".

The question to you is: Why should the opinions of an extreme minority be given any special consideration?
Click to expand...

Bump for Dictator Cheney, or any other CTer that wants to tackle the question.
 
I wonder what the families of United Flight 93 who were trashed by Dylan Avery, DRG, Fetzer, and the execrable Killtown among other ‘truth seekers’ think of the 9-11 Truth movement? Have any of them come out for a new investigation?
 
Walter Ego said:
I wonder what the families of United Flight 93 who were trashed by Dylan Avery, DRG, Fetzer, and the execrable Killtown among other ‘truth seekers’ think of the 9-11 Truth movement? Have any of them come out for a new investigation?
Click to expand...

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Derrill Bodley, father of Deora Bodley, passenger on Flight 93
Maggie Cashman, wife of William Joseph Cashman, United Flight 93
Lori, Jerry, and Beatrice Guadagno, sister and parents of Richard Guadagno, Flight 93
 
johnny karate said:
You do so by implying that their questions merit importance.

So the questions remains: Why should the opinions of an extreme minority be given any special consideration?
Click to expand...

implying?
i didnt try to imply that. i think theyr oppinion counts as much as any other persons oppinion, not more not less.
i think also the oppinions of fam. members that come out against theorys or reinvestigations.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
implying?
i didnt try to imply that. i think theyr oppinion counts as much as any other persons oppinion, not more not less.
i think also the oppinions of fam. members that come out against theorys or reinvestigations.
Click to expand...

But their opinions demand action on the part of others. For you, or anyone else, to to claim those opinions warrant action, you are giving them more credence then the opinions of those that do not warrant said action.

In this case, we have a very small minority demanding action, while the overwhelming majority is not.

So why should anyone be compelled to respond to these demands?
 
johnny karate said:
But their opinions demand action on the part of others. For you, or anyone else, to to claim those opinions warrant action, you are giving them more credence then the opinions of those that do not warrant said action.

In this case, we have a very small minority demanding action, while the overwhelming majority is not.

So why should anyone be compelled to respond to these demands?
Click to expand...

i never came across a fam member that spoke out against a re investigations. i would also consider theyr oppinion.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
Pressfor911truth is "theyr" docu, never saw a "debunking" to it, searchfunction did not bring up a single hit.
Click to expand...


There's at least one thread on it somewhere...

Why have you spelled their wrong and put it in quotes?

Here's a thread on "9/11 Press For Truth".

I disagree, however, that "9/11 Press For Truth" is "their" documentary. "Press For Truth" was primarily inspired by and based on Paul Thompson's "9/11 Terror Timeline" and most of the documentary focuses on this. Incidentally it also contradicts its own central premise.

I would argue the documentary that is most "their" documentary is "In Their Own Words" and we have a thread discussing that film too.

This second doco is much better at uncovering just how far gone these Jersey Girls are, because in it they push their own authority on the subject, immediately establishing themselves as more knowledgable than the rest of the public, yet they cannot even get the most fundamentally basic facts correct - such as when the FBI released photographs of the hijackers.

Now, personally I can't believe that four grown women, after 6 years of extensive research, don't know when the FBI released photos of the hijackers, especially considering they claim this particular point is so important.

As demonstrated in that thread, an eight year old child found the task of locating the FBI press release with the photographs to be very straight forward.

So, are these four woman suffering from some form of mental illness, or are they outright liars? Or can you offer an alternative explanation for this unfathomable level of wrongness?

CLE quite noticeably refused to address this point from me, and ran from the thread.

Perhaps you can explain it for me.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
i never came across a fam member that spoke out against a re investigations. i would also consider theyr oppinion.
Click to expand...

You're dodging my question.

Fact: A very small minority of family members are asking for a new investigation. The overwhelming majority are not.

Why should we concede to the demands of a small minority?
 
johnny karate said:
You're dodging my question.

Fact: A very small minority of family members are asking for a new investigation. The overwhelming majority are not.

Why should we concede to the demands of a small minority?
Click to expand...

Why should we concede to the demands of a small minority?

never demanded that :/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom