"Jersey Girls"

Dictator Cheney said:
i didnt find any questions directed at JREF or at its posters, i see a hole bunch of good and some not so good questions to the involved ppl, not to some JREFers or truthers or whatever.

im sure your totaly convinced by the answers you can find here on jref, and some of the JREFers theorys are really good and plaisible. but i think thats not what they want. the directed questions to Cheney, Clinton Bush, Tennet and so on. the involved ppl, just cause you go convinced by some answers does not mean they are totaly undebunkable facts.
Click to expand...

Just as I suspected, you are not going to do some research. Links are provided in the posts, but you will refuse to look. Specific questions are answered, with sources.

You will continue saying the questions are unanswered, like the other CulTists, bu that is because you are refusing to see what is before you.
 
Disbelief said:
Just as I suspected, you are not going to do some research. Links are provided in the posts, but you will refuse to look. Specific questions are answered, with sources.

You will continue saying the questions are unanswered, like the other CulTists, bu that is because you are refusing to see what is before you.
Click to expand...

who says i did not research? they claim theyr answers arent asked, and i know debunkers have found theorys for all kind os questions. and some are good indeed, but according to the Jersey girls, most questions was never answered. i guess they ment, it was never answered by the commission.
 
Last edited:
Dictator Cheney said:
who says i did not research? they claim theyr answers arent asked, and i know debunkers have found theorys for all kind os questions. and some are good indeed, but according to the Jersey girls, most questions was never answered. i guess they ment, it was never answered by the commission.
Click to expand...

So, when they ask this question:

Why didn't the CIA share vital information about the terrorists with the FBI?
Click to expand...

And they get the response that it was illegal before 9/11 for the FBI and CIA to share it, that is not a good enough answer? Here is where your research fails, because you do not delve into why it was set up that way. Maybe if you did that, you would better understand the answer and why it is the only answer they will ever get.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
i didnt find any questions directed at JREF or at its posters, i see a hole bunch of good and some not so good questions to the involved ppl, not to some JREFers or truthers or whatever.

im sure your totaly convinced by the answers you can find here on jref, and some of the JREFers theorys are really good and plaisible. but i think thats not what they want.
Click to expand...
i agree, answers are not what they want, as long as their questions are "unanswered" it keeps them in a spotlight

they dont want justice, they dont want truth, they just want a scapegoat, they want someone they can blame for their loss and then crucify that person, whether that individual is actually at fault or not
 
Disbelief said:
So, when they ask this question:



And they get the response that it was illegal before 9/11 for the FBI and CIA to share it, that is not a good enough answer? Here is where your research fails, because you do not delve into why it was set up that way. Maybe if you did that, you would better understand the answer and why it is the only answer they will ever get.
Click to expand...

wow my research i never have don according to you, failed now?
well sorry, it was illegal , maybe a good enough answer to you, but im more curious :)
such an answer leads to more questions
 
defaultdotxbe said:
i agree, answers are not what they want, as long as their questions are "unanswered" it keeps them in a spotlight

they dont want justice, they dont want truth, they just want a scapegoat, they want someone they can blame for their loss and then crucify that person, whether that individual is actually at fault or not
Click to expand...

they want someone they can blame for their loss and then crucify that person, whether that individual is actually at fault or not.

well afaik they not even demanded some hangings. its still about investigations. was it the jersey girls that rushed to afghanistan to hunt a man on wich the FBI till today did not add those crimes on his most wanted poster's crime list. the did not even change "MURDER OF U.S. NATIONALS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES; CONSPIRACY TO MURDER U.S. NATIONALS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES; ATTACK ON A FEDERAL FACILITY RESULTING IN DEATH"

or "In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world."
 
Dictator Cheney said:
well afaik they not even demanded some hangings. its still about investigations.
Click to expand...
right, they need to find out who they can hang first

read over their list of questions again, how many of them ask that a single individual be singled out? why do they assume that a single person was responsible for each decision they feel was made in error? because they want someone they can punish

OBL doesnt work because hes not in custody, i bet if we had caught and tried him right after 9/11 the jersey girls would have been happy, theyd have had their pound of flesh, but since we cant find OBL they need a more convenient scapegoat
 
Dictator Cheney said:
but i think thats not what they want. the directed questions to Cheney, Clinton Bush, Tennet and so on.
Click to expand...

And that's entirely their prerogative.

But the question remains: How are the supposed unanswered questions of a very small minority of victims' family members even remotely significant?

The overwhelming majority of the family members are not asking these questions or demanding a new investigation, so why should special consideration be given to a very tiny percentage?
 
defaultdotxbe said:
right, they need to find out who they can hang first

read over their list of questions again, how many of them ask that a single individual be singled out? why do they assume that a single person was responsible for each decision they feel was made in error? because they want someone they can punish

OBL doesnt work because hes not in custody, i bet if we had caught and tried him right after 9/11 the jersey girls would have been happy, theyd have had their pound of flesh, but since we cant find OBL they need a more convenient scapegoat
Click to expand...

atleast they want to investigate first :) speaks for them
 
Last edited:
johnny karate said:
And that's entirely their prerogative.

But the question remains: How are the supposed unanswered questions of a very small minority of victims' family members even remotely significant?

The overwhelming majority of the family members are not asking these questions or demanding a new investigation, so why should special consideration be given to a very tiny percentage?
Click to expand...

they mostly ask ppl in charge of some government bodys. also pre bush admin etc.

sure they cannot answer all the questions by themself. turned out that some of them seem to have Altzheimer , i cannot recall that sir.......
 
defaultdotxbe said:
them ignoring th emultiple confessions from bin laden himself and other members of al qaeda in favor of wanting to blame someone else also speaks for them
Click to expand...

what is the jersey girls theyr theory? incompetence? lihop? mihop?
 
Personally I think the behavior of these women is more disgusting than the behavior of an ignorant Conspiracy Theorist.

They claim to have spent thousands of hours, endless days, a number of years, researching every single tiny detail of 9/11. They use their own authority on the subject to try and push their arguments and give themselves a sense of authority. They also cite the memory of their loved ones as their primary reason for needing to know "the truth".

And yet they're as abysmally wrong as an ignorant teenager in their parents' basement. Some of the "facts" they claim can be determined to be wrong after a few seconds online. Yet these women have had the advantage of talking in person to those directly involved.

If I was their dead relative I'd be ashamed of them.
 
gumboot said:
Personally I think the behavior of these women is more disgusting than the behavior of an ignorant Conspiracy Theorist.

They claim to have spent thousands of hours, endless days, a number of years, researching every single tiny detail of 9/11. They use their own authority on the subject to try and push their arguments and give themselves a sense of authority. They also cite the memory of their loved ones as their primary reason for needing to know "the truth".

And yet they're as abysmally wrong as an ignorant teenager in their parents' basement. Some of the "facts" they claim can be determined to be wrong after a few seconds online. Yet these women have had the advantage of talking in person to those directly involved.

If I was their dead relative I'd be ashamed of them.
Click to expand...

got examples ?
 
Dictator Cheney said:
they mostly ask ppl in charge of some government bodys. also pre bush admin etc.

sure they cannot answer all the questions by themself. turned out that some of them seem to have Altzheimer , i cannot recall that sir.......
Click to expand...

Yeah, I'm not sure what you're trying to say here...

But I'm pretty sure you completely ignored my questions:

johnny karate said:
But the question remains: How are the supposed unanswered questions of a very small minority of victims' family members even remotely significant?

The overwhelming majority of the family members are not asking these questions or demanding a new investigation, so why should special consideration be given to a very tiny percentage?
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom