"Jersey Girls"

Dictator Cheney said:
i also think they are a minority, but you seem to have big hands
Click to expand...

And in true CTer fashion you choose to parse the words of my post rather than address the issue I raised.

Even with the addition of your list (and assuming its validity), you still have a very tiny minority.

Why should their opinions be lent any more credence than those of the overwhelming majority of family members who have chosen not to join their ranks?
 
johnny karate said:
And in true CTer fashion you choose to parse the words of my post rather than address the issue I raised.

Even with the addition of your list (and assuming its validity), you still have a very tiny minority.

Why should their opinions be lent any more credence than those of the overwhelming majority of family members who have chosen not to join their ranks?
Click to expand...

are all those, that did not speak out public or join a group etc, against new investigations?
 
Dictator Cheney said:
this are indeed excerpts from the lists of questions the Family Steering Committee has submitted to the 9/11 Commission.

im sure on JREF they could find them all answered.

wich one do you find the most "stupid" one and wich one is the "best" ?
Click to expand...
this one is pretty close to the one wildcat quoted

5. Why was there no roof-top evacuation?
Click to expand...

and considering this question
3. Why were the roof access doors locked?
Click to expand...

i think we now know the answer to #5
 
Dictator Cheney said:
are all those, that did not speak out public or join a group etc, against new investigations?
Click to expand...

Of course I do not possess the ability to read minds, but considering that we are talking about people who had a loved one horrifically murdered, common sense would dictate that if any of them felt the reasons they were given were at all insufficient, they would be vocal about it, as in the case of the Jersey Girls.

I know CTers like to play the "silent masses" game in order to give the appearance of a consensus, but to imply that someone who had a loved one murdered would not publicly question an investigation into that murder they felt was inadequate is not only ridiculous, it's offensive.

The fact remains, you have a very small list of names out of a group of thousands of people. It's not even close to being a significant percentage, let alone a consensus.

So why do you feel that this very small minority's criticism of the 9/11 investigation is any more valid than the tacit approval given to it by the vast majority of others?
 
Last edited:
johnny karate said:
Of course I do not possess the ability to read minds, but considering that we are talking about people who had a loved one horrifically murdered, common sense would dictate that if any of them who felt the reasons they were given were at all insufficient, would be vocal about it.

I know CTers like to play the "silent masses" game in order to give the appearance of a consensus, but to imply that someone who had a loved one murdered would not publicly question an investigation into that murder they felt was inadequate is not only ridiculous, it's offensive.

The fact remains, you have a very small list of names out of a group of thousands of people. It's not even close to being a significant percentage, let alone a consensus.

So why do you feel that this very small minority's criticism of the 9/11 investigation is any more valid than the tacit approval given to it by the vast majority of others?
Click to expand...

when you take a look how those ppl are called here, and mostly ignored by the media, i am not so sure how many want to speak public.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
when you take a look how those ppl are called here, and mostly ignored by the media, i am not so sure how many want to speak public.
Click to expand...
"my husband was murdered but i wont say anything because people on the internet might make fun of me"

riiiight
 
Last edited:
Dictator Cheney said:
when you take a look how those ppl are called here, and mostly ignored by the media, i am not so sure how many want to speak public.
Click to expand...

As I said, this particular implication is offensive.

You're basically saying that there are family members out there who accept what they consider to be an inadequate investigation into the murder of a loved one out of cowardice or lack of resolve.

What's truly amazing about such a despicable accusation is that in this very thread you and other CTers express indignation over the supposed shoddy treatment given the Jersey Girls, and yet you have no compunction about insulting a much greater number of victims' family members.

Of course all of this is just dodge to avoid answering my question anyway.
 
Last edited:
For all of the twoofers' claims about questions asked and left answered, I have not seen any evidence in support of such claims.

So... evidence.... got any?
 
I love how the CTers try to ride the coat tails of people who simply aren't satisfied and try to spin them into being other CTers. Not unlike how CTers leech onto anti-war protests to make it look like people actually listen to them.
 
Jonnyclueless said:
I love how the CTers try to ride the coat tails of people who simply aren't satisfied and try to spin them into being other CTers. Not unlike how CTers leech onto anti-war protests to make it look like people actually listen to them.
Click to expand...

i just wonder why its always claimed that they make money off 9/11, but then you claim nobody listen to them, so i guess they dont sell theyr books and movies and nobody goes to theyr public "forums"
 
Dictator Cheney said:
i just wonder why its always claimed that they make money off 9/11, but then you claim nobody listen to them, so i guess they dont sell theyr books and movies and nobody goes to theyr public "forums"
Click to expand...

Being a fraud and charlatan and generally being ignored by the world at large are not mutually exclusive concepts,
 
Disbelief said:
With a little research, maybe they will realize that a lot of those questions have been answered. I just perused some of them, and you could use the search function here and find the answers.
Click to expand...

i really dont think they want such important answers from a bunch of JREFers or CTers or whatever, they want those answers directly from the ppl the want to ask. bush cheney rummy condy clinton powel and so on.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
i really dont think they want such important answers from a bunch of JREFers or CTers or whatever, they want those answers directly from the ppl the want to ask. bush cheney rummy condy clinton powel and so on.
Click to expand...

Yeah, because they would not want sources that go along with the posts. I would again tell you to use the search function, read the posts and the accompanying links, but I know you won't. Just JAQing off without listening to the real answers.
 
Disbelief said:
Yeah, because they would not want sources that go along with the posts. I would again tell you to use the search function, read the posts and the accompanying links, but I know you won't. Just JAQing off without listening to the real answers.
Click to expand...

i didnt find any questions directed at JREF or at its posters, i see a hole bunch of good and some not so good questions to the involved ppl, not to some JREFers or truthers or whatever.

im sure your totaly convinced by the answers you can find here on jref, and some of the JREFers theorys are really good and plaisible. but i think thats not what they want. the directed questions to Cheney, Clinton Bush, Tennet and so on. the involved ppl, just cause you go convinced by some answers does not mean they are totaly undebunkable facts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom