JEROME - Black holes do not exist

[Megalodon]

How can the force of gravity of the Earth be constant in relation to various objects that have different masses thus different gravity forces of their own?

It can't.

However, the mass of the Earth is (obviously) much greater than that of any object in it's surface. Thus, the gravitational effect of the object on the Earth is not relevant (unless you're really into very small numbers) and you can talk, for practical purposes, of a gravitational constant.

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

It can't.

However, the mass of the Earth is (obviously) much greater than that of any object in it's surface. Thus, the gravitational effect of the object on the Earth is not relevant (unless you're really into very small numbers) and you can talk, for practical purposes, of a gravitational constant.

The force of gravity is not relevant!


If I were to place two oranges in space and placed them in close proximity, would they be attracted to each other by their force of gravity?

 

[Paulhoff]

The moon has 1/81 the gravity of the earth, because it has 1/81 the mass of the earth, the sun has about 332,946 times the gravity of the earth because it is 332,946 times the mass of the earth, only people who just what to argue from ignorance can't understand this.

Paul

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

The moon has 1/81 the gravity of the earth, because it has 1/81 the mass of the earth, the sun has about 332,946 times the gravity of the earth because it is 332,946 times the mass of the earth, only people who just what to argue from ignorance can't understand this.

Paul

Not the question. Here you go again.

If I were to place two oranges in space and placed them in close proximity, would they be attracted to each other by their force of gravity?

 

[Megalodon]

If I were to place two oranges in space and placed them in close proximity, would they be attracted to each other by their force of gravity?

Yes.

And if you put them in your kitchen counter, at the same distance, they will exert exactly the same gravitational pull on each other.

 

[Reality Check]

The force of gravity is not relevant!


If I were to place two oranges in space and placed them in close proximity, would they be attracted to each other by their force of gravity?

Yes.

Please give us your definition of force.

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

Yes.

And if you put them in your kitchen counter, at the same distance, they will exert exactly the same gravitational pull on each other.

If this is so, than would not objects in close proximity to the Earth "fall" at different rates based upon their different mass and thus different gravitational force?

 

[Paulhoff]

If I were to place two oranges in space and placed them in close proximity, would they be attracted to each other by their force of gravity?

Yes, and I can tell you how fast (well it would be very slow out in deep space). It is why they now talk about micro gravity while in orbit because the ship that they are in and everything in the ship has gravity on a very very low scale.

JEROME does not understand gravity and also what the ignore fuction is.

Paul

 

[Dan O.]

JEROME does not understand gravity and also what the ignore fuction is.

Would you expect a Looney Tune character to understand physical laws (or even logic)?

 

[Reality Check]

If this is so, than would not objects in close proximity to the Earth "fall" at different rates based upon their different mass and thus different gravitational force?

If you knew about Newton's law of gravity you would know that the force on the masses is different. But the acceleration of the objects is the force divided by their mass and so their acceleration is the same (you may have heard about a guy called Galileo).

 

[Elizabeth I]

See Newton's law of gravity (remember that in high school?).

Maybe jdg didn't go to high school. Maybe he went straight from junior high school (or the equivalent wherever he lives) to full-blown adult ignorance.

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

Would you expect a Looney Tune character to understand physical laws (or even logic)?

Would that mean that you have the intellect of a feline?

 

[Reality Check]

Maybe jdg didn't go to high school. Maybe he went straight from junior high school (or the equivalent wherever he lives) to full-blown adult ignorance.

Actually I have doubts about whether he is even old enough to go to high school given the quality of his posts and his abysmal lack of knowledge. Or maybe he was home schooled.

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

If you knew about Newton's law of gravity you would know that the force on the masses is different. But the acceleration of the objects is the force divided by their mass and so their acceleration is the same (you may have heard about a guy called Galileo).

A larger mass has a greater gravity force but decreased acceleration.

What force decreases the acceleration?

 

[Reality Check]

A larger mass has a greater gravity force but decreased acceleration.

What force decreases the acceleration?

None

 

[Paulhoff]

Originally Posted by JEROME DA GNOME
If this is so, than would not objects in close proximity to the Earth "fall" at different rates based upon their different mass and thus different gravitational force?

Well at least some of you guys quote him so I can see his so-called questions, so here goes an answer to his little question.

Yes, the more massive object falls faster, and since I've show you some of the math, you will see that the object's mass doesn't make enough gravity to show up in a simple experiment, but if one does the math, that billionth of a billionth or so of a second will show up when it hits first.

If one where to drop the moon and the apple from the same height on opposed sides of the earth at the same time, the moon would hit the earth first and all hell would break out.

Paul

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

None

Than why would object A with a large mass "fall" to the Earth with the same acceleration as object B with a small mass?


What is the cause?

 

[JEROME DA GNOME]

Well at least some of you guys quote him so I can see his so-called questions, so here goes an answer to his little question.

Yes, the more massive object falls faster, and since I've show you some of the math, you will see that the object's mass doesn't make enough gravity to show up in a simple experiment, but if one does the math, that billionth of a billionth or so of a second will show up.

If one where to drop the moon and the apple from the same height on opposed sides of the earth at the same time, the moon would hit the earth first and all hell would break out.

Paul

If mass determines the gravity force of an object than the hammer should hit first as it's gravity force is greater than that of the feather.

Why does everyone discount the gravity of the object?


Feather & Hammer Drop on Moon

 

[Olowkow]

The moon has 1/81 the gravity of the earth, because it has 1/81 the mass of the earth, the sun has about 332,946 times the gravity of the earth because it is 332,946 times the mass of the earth, only people who just what to argue from ignorance can't understand this.

Paul

Pretty sure the moon's gravity is 1/6th of earth's. Different densities, and masses. It depends on how far from the center of the massive object you are, so the density (moon is 3/5 earth) is critical.
This is pretty much it:
http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/gravity_universal_equation.htm

 

[Hindmost]

If mass determines the gravity force of an object than the hammer should hit first as it's gravity force is greater than that of the feather.

Why does everyone discount the gravity of the object?


Feather & Hammer Drop on Moon

gravity can be thought of as force per kilogram when considering the weight of an object. Therefore, feather or hammer, the force and mass increase proportionally and they accelerate at the same rate.

Newtons third. the force of gravity on the feather from the moon is equal and opposite to the force of gravity from the feather on the moon.

forces come in pairs.

now, that the earth having weight quiz. see if you can answer it...

glenn