Jenny Moore, dead in hotel room.

[Whip]

never heard not wasting the time reporting on someone that didn't exist as 'off limits' lmao. trolling at it's lamest.

 

[Delphic Oracle]

Still waiting for reasons to believe things are "not properly investigated."

Besides the conclusion being other than what was hoped for, that is.

 

[BStrong]

It's functionally off limits to the alternative media, too, but that's only because what's really going on here is 1) unknown 2) unknowable 3) even explaining the parts which are known would require a small book at this point, because it's so complex and convoluted.

ETA:
One thing which is virtually certain is that whatever is actually going on here has nothing to do with the "the Clintons" and anything nefarious they've done.

This is some sort of fake news performance art/hoaxing involving a literal cast of fictional youtube characters .

Having encountered the living persons that bought the whole McMartin school story hook, line and sinker I have no trouble believing their intellectual descendants are active on youtube without any encouragement from anyone - there's even a real, live, guy from my side of the street that's on that bandwagon:

https://vets4childrescue.org/pages/craig-sawman-sawyer

 

[Henri McPhee]

One thing which is virtually certain is that whatever is actually going on here has nothing to do with the "the Clintons" and anything nefarious they've done.

This is some sort of fake news performance art/hoaxing involving a literal cast of fictional youtube characters .

I agree with you that a lot of this 'George Webb' and other opinions on the internet are not necessarily relevant to the Jenny Moore case. I still think Robyn Gritz who was supposed to be a friend of Jenny Moore and a former FBI agent, is relevant. She is supposed to have said that Jenny Moore had been investigating pedophile activities by Bill Clinton, which is a dangerous business to investigate.

I agree with this posting on the internet about the Jenny Moore case:

https://delaware.craigslist.org/pol/d/clintons/6676670441.html

I would like to know when Enough is Enough with the Clinton's? How many people are going to mysteriously commit suicide or be murdered as in the recent case with the investigative reporter named Jenny Moore that use to be a police officer who was investigating Bill Clinton's ties to child sex trafficking.

After Jenny found a witness that was willing to testify she contacted the FBI and a week later she is murdered!!! Why is this being hushed up by the mainstream news?!!!

Why are police going along with these ridiculous reports of a lot of them being classified as a suicide even though in some cases they were shot in the back of the head not once, but Twice!!!

This is getting beyond ridiculous!!! There is way too much smoke here for there not to be fire!!!

 

[kellyb]

Having encountered the living persons that bought the whole McMartin school story hook, line and sinker I have no trouble believing their intellectual descendants are active on youtube without any encouragement from anyone - there's even a real, live, guy from my side of the street that's on that bandwagon:

https://vets4childrescue.org/pages/craig-sawman-sawyer

Yeah, I know there are lots "true believes" in all that stuff, but this little "family" of youtubers ("George Webb"/truthleaks, "Jason Goodman"/crowdsourcethetruth", "Dave Acton"/David Sweigert, "Marcus Conte") is made of youtube performance artists acting out some online drama.

They're full of ****, not crazy. Alex Jones was/is more "authentic" than them, and that's saying something! They're not kooks. They're acting. If you watch some of their videos and read about them, I think you'll agree.

I would just assume they're "volunteer pranksters" like the people who used to make crop circles for fun, but that doesn't explain the Jen Moore/Jem777 thing, specifically how snopes verified with police that someone with that name actually did die.

So...I'm perplexed.

Maybe they're pranksters funded by whoever funds rightwing fake news outlets like Spero and TruePundit, and they drew a "real" conspiracy theorist (Jen Moore) in, and she just happened to drop dead in her hotel room while she was in DC hanging out with them, and the pranksters somehow hooked that fired FBI chick, Robyn Fritz, in as well as calling all the fake news outlets to spin the lie about Jen being a journalist, etc and so on.

I'm not sure how to account for this:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kUsHS9vgzFxi/... this under that hypothesis, tho.

Or this (by "Dave", who claims to be "George's" brother):
https://www.slideshare.net/dgsweige...-the-cognitive-threat-of-conspiracy-theorists

There really seems to be some multi-layer hoaxing going on, and I have no idea what the objective actually is. Maybe just to get "internet famous"?

 

[Whip]

Still waiting for reasons to believe things are "not properly investigated."

Besides the conclusion being other than what was hoped for, that is.

because it goes against what everyone else says. there is a long, documented history here.

 

[kellyb]

never heard not wasting the time reporting on someone that didn't exist as 'off limits' lmao. trolling at it's lamest.

But, see, someone named Jen Moore apparently existed:

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/jen-moore-death/

Police in Prince Georges County, Maryland, confirmed to us that Jen Moore died on 13 August 2018

Hence my confusion.

 

[kellyb]

I agree with this posting on the internet about the Jenny Moore case:

https://delaware.craigslist.org/pol/d/clintons/6676670441.html

How can you agree with that when "Jen" is referred to as an "investigative reporter" there?

 

[Delphic Oracle]

because it goes against what everyone else says. there is a long, documented history here.

Documentary records of postulations and assertions don't make the postulations and assertions more credible.

 

[kellyb]

This guy has a theory about it all...

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/stop-citizen-psychological-warfare-brad-erhart/

 

[kellyb]

David / George / Webb / Sweigert (however you want to call that persona-collective) has written a a few books, too, one being:

https://www.amazon.com/Journalists-Enemies-Breed-Deception-Merchants/dp/1718763883

DIRTY TRICKS. What are the dirty tricks relied upon by a new breed of social media deception merchants. Operators of fake hoax social media sites lure viewers with scandals, rumors, hoaxes and drama -- all usually conjured up by the profit-driven "investigative journalist". The bounds of decent conduct and the laws of the land seemingly can not curtail these hoax news operators. Cyber warfare weapons have recently been relied upon to squash dissent of those with an alternative view. A story of our time, our people and our culture.

Also, lady named Patricia "Trish" Negron apparently used to be "in" with them, but she's sort of mostly disappeared off the internet, after a supposed falling out. But she just commented on a LiftTheVeil (one of the personalities in the internet hoax circle...he seems more legit than the rest, but I'm still beyond skeptical) video this quote a few days ago:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_8zsuyeayE

Pinned by Lift the Veil
Patricia Negron
3 days ago
'Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums.'

https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

Getting duped by someone like "George", erasing your former internet presence, and only popping in every once in a while to post something like that at least sounds like something a real person would do. I have no idea if she's part of the act or not, tho.

 

[thaiboxerken]

Like a typical conspiracy theory thread, this one has conspiracy theorists in it floating other conspiracy theories as justification as to why this particular nonsense is plausible.

What I've learned is that Jenny Moore is not a journalist. If she is this Task Force person on you tube, she is/was another wachy-doodle conspiracy theorist. The implication that she was murdered by Clinton or Clinton people is idiotic.

 

[kellyb]

Like a typical conspiracy theory thread, this one has conspiracy theorists in it floating other conspiracy theories as justification as to why this particular nonsense is plausible.

What I've learned is that Jenny Moore is not a journalist. If she is this Task Force person on you tube, she is/was another wachy-doodle conspiracy theorist. The implication that she was murdered by Clinton or Clinton people is idiotic.

There's only one person here insisting it's plausible that she was killed by Clinton. He's to be ignored.

What do you make of the fact that the first person on the internet claiming the dead "Jen Moore" is the youtuber "taskforce" is...

this:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=12413278&postcount=103

guy:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=12413915&postcount=115

???


There is a whole lot weird here, but none of it implicates the Clintons/"Clinton's people" in any way. It's some other type of bizarre.

 

[thaiboxerken]

The weird is certainly on the conspiracy theorists' side of it all.

 

[kellyb]

The weird is certainly on the conspiracy theorists' side of it all.

Which conspiracy theorists? Who specifically is on the other side?

 

[thaiboxerken]

Which conspiracy theorists? Who specifically is on the other side?

Exactly.

 

[kellyb]

@Valient_defender on twitter is Robin Gritz, the former FBI agent who didn't even know Jen Moore's name, had only messaged with Jen knowing her as "taskforce", but who someone (almost definitely George Webb/David Sweigert) had listed as Jen Moore's "next of kin" to the cops.
She's claiming here on twitter to be phone friendly with "George Webb", and the both of them are friendly with TruePundit/MikeMoore/ThomasPaine.

https://twitter.com/vabelle2010/status/1010240422474592259

@SethAbramson
Jun 21

19/ Robyn Gritz—a disgruntled former FBI employee who describes herself as a good friend of Flynn—has been cited by True Pundit, co-interviewed with "Thomas Paine" (True Pundit editor-in-chief) and says she's met "Thomas Paine" through a mutual acquaintance, George Webb Sweigert.

Robyn responds:

Valiant_defender
‏@vabelle2010
Follow Follow @vabelle2010
Replying to @TomWellborn3 @SethAbramson
Nice Tom. You believe this guy? Met TP when asked to do that interview, I met Flynn while working Counterterrorism for 16 years, George Webb posted on Twitter to talk to me.That ended up being one call. I think you know me by now Tom. My EEO was filed in 2012, way before all this
12:17 PM - 22 Jun 2018

The youtube hoaxer crew (and maybe the biggest fake news outlets/websites) are possibly/probably being funded by whoever funds the London Center for Policy Research where Robyn works and Michael Flynn worked, I think.

The alternative (and this one is the one that accounts more thoroughly for David Sweigert's actual documented history, I think) is that the "youtube LARP crew" and the "right wing fake news website crew" are two different groups, and the youtube crew (whoever funds them) is out to expose the latter group as the dangerous frauds they are. If that's the case, the youtube LARPers were probably trying to get a following in order to channel the nuttiest of the pizzagaters to the fake news outlets.

And when you look through the tweets and videos and posts of jem777 at voat, she really was deeply, deeply disturbed if she wasn't part of the act. If she had "gone public", she would have instantly discredited herself. She thought Obama was Hitler's son or grandson and all sorts of other all-the-way loony stuff.

 

[kellyb]

OMG! Right now (2 hours ago!) Robyn Gritz says she's leaving twitter over George Webb drama:

https://twitter.com/ITNJFraud/status/1037065548511596544

&

https://twitter.com/vabelle2010/status/1037158853815791617

 

[kellyb]

She gives another shoutout to/about Jen Moore and George Webb!


https://twitter.com/vabelle2010/status/1037156121159630850

Did the youtuber crew infiltrate the pizzagate cult to blow it and their right wing fake news website world up? LOL

What is this?

 

[Cosmic Yak]

I agree with you that there should not be a rush to judgment about this Jenny Moore business, even though it seems to be off limits with the corporate mainstream media. It's just I would not feel safe if I had politically embarrassing information on the Clintons, especially in regard to their time in Arkansas, or any pedophile activities. There is at least one alternative view on the internet which may please thaiboxerken:

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/02/clinton-conspiracy-theories-kathleen-willey-chronicles/

The headline of that link:

Here Come the Crazy Clinton Conspiracies of the 1990s.

Henri McPhee: were you quoting this article as evidence for the veracity of the anti-Clinton conspiracy theories, or for their obvious idiocy? I really can't tell. The article itself is saying how stupid they are. Is that why you linked to it?

Then Fox News upped the ante by booking Kathleen Willey, who has hinted (in a convoluted manner) that the Clintons were involved in the deaths of her husband and Vince Foster, a Clinton White House aide who committed suicide during the first year of Bill Clinton’s presidency. Willey has also claimed that Bill Clinton groped her in the White House and suggested that the Clintons had her cats killed.

Also in your post, you say that these stories are "off-limits with the copporate mainstream media" and then go on to quote Fox News reporting on it, which is about as corporate and mainstream as you could ask for.

Is it your intention to shoot down your own arguments, or am I missing something here?