Henri McPhee
Illuminator
The police evidence was false.
Merged Jeffrey MacDonald did it. He really did.
- Thread starter Bob001
- Start date
- Status
desmirelle
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2016
- Messages
- 483
BStrong
Penultimate Amazing
roflmao! only henri would try to claim that over 1,100 pieces of evidence that was presented at trial is wrong. Also, those evidence items were only 60% of the available evidence and with the DNA results proving that the mystery hair was 100% DNA match to inmate the case NOW would be even stronger against inmate.
He is guilty and we all know he is guilty.
He is guilty and we all know he is guilty.
KatieG
Rootin' Tootin' Raspberry
And he knows he's guilty. Having denied his guilt for so many years, even dangling probation under his nose couldn't make him back down. Pride goeth before destruction and a haughty spirit before a fall.
Consciousness Of Guilt
From the moment he ran his mouth during the 4/6/70 CID interview, inmate exhibited a "consciousness of guilt."
http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com/html/consciousness_of_guilt.html
From the moment he ran his mouth during the 4/6/70 CID interview, inmate exhibited a "consciousness of guilt."
http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com/html/consciousness_of_guilt.html
desmirelle
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2016
- Messages
- 483
One of the saddest parts of this case: If you edit his conversation with the operator down when he 'called for help' - it boils down to "Some people killed some people and then he says the operator is an ******* because she wants his address so she could send appropriate help.
The intruders were "some people".....his slaughtered family were "some people"......but asking where he lived so the MPs or Civilian authorities could be called made a woman trying to help "an *******". Seriously? These are the words of a loving husband and father? Darlie Routier at least had the "somebody killed my babies..." schtick. Her kids weren't just "some people".
The intruders were "some people".....his slaughtered family were "some people"......but asking where he lived so the MPs or Civilian authorities could be called made a woman trying to help "an *******". Seriously? These are the words of a loving husband and father? Darlie Routier at least had the "somebody killed my babies..." schtick. Her kids weren't just "some people".
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
There is an interesting quote in that English Justice book published in 1932 by a solicitor which is relevant to the MacDonald case:
Sorry, but that quote has no relevance to inmate's case because as we all know and you do too (you just refuse to admit it) inmate is guilty. Not just guilty but guilty beyond ALL doubt. The final nail in the coffin was the "mystery hair" that even the defense said would be from the murderer and is a 100% DNA match to inmate. He is guilty.
desi - you nailed it/him "some people" killed "some people" and not just the operator was a ******* remember his reason for not going to the neighbor across the street? She too was a *******......and seriously, IF my family had been attacked I wouldn't have cared a wit if a neighbor was nosey or if I "barely" knew them or any of that BS, I'd have gone screaming and banging on every damn door I could get to begging for assistance. That is what real humans with feelings would do.....
Jungle Jim
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2008
- Messages
- 1,274
I think it will slow down quite a bit once the inmate is deceased.
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
That mystery hair was unidentified until 2006. I reckon it was substituted by dishonest Murtagh and Malone at the FBI lab as a MacDonald hair for the DNA testing at the AFIP lab, despite Judge 'in bed with the prosecution' Fox previous ruling that any tampering with the forensic evidence should be videotaped. That's known technically as forensic fraud. That was to try to prevent any further MacDonald appeals. MacDonald was screwed and the prosecution never proved its case.
Yes, it was unidentified thus it was called the mystery hair but there is no mystery WHY it was unidentified. You have been told this before but PERHAPS this time you will try and grasp the FACTS......
the mystery hair was the distal (tip) portion of a limb hair. ONLY HEAD and PUBIC hair have enough distinguishing characteristics to be microscopically compared. any other human hair it can be determined if it is a limb or body hair and that is ALL. Now, of course DNA testing is available, the hair was tested, and it was proven to be a 100% match to inmate. period.
What you reckon is beyond ridiculous. The hair fragment was secured with other evidence since its collection. HOW EXACTLY would Murtagh or anyone else manage to collect an exact size, type, and BLOODY limb hair from inmate without his knowledge to add it to the hair samples bound for DNA testing? Judge Fox didn't rule that any "tampering" be videotaped. Judge Fox ruled that the preparation and packing of the evidence bound for DNA testing be videotaped AND members of the defense team were authorized to be present. As far as I know the process was taped and observed. So, if the defense doesn't dismiss the FACTS why do you think YOU have a right to do so? I also, as I have noted many times find your comments about Murtagh and Judge Fox offensive. Just because you do not like the fact that they are right and you are wrong and that your man crush is guilty doesn't mean you have the right to bad mouth and make unsubstantiated and ridiculous claims about these honorable men.
The prosecution proved its case back in 1979 AT TRIAL and that is why inmate is a convicted felon and in prison. There was no fraud of any kind and your comments to the contrary show a decided lack of intellect.
if inmate had not slaughtered his pregnant wife Colette, and his precious daughters Kimmie and Kristy as well as his unborn son, he would not have been "screwed". You reap what you sow and he did. Inmate has had many more appeals than he should have been allowed but the Government does not need to commit fraud or do anything illegal to keep him in prison. The decision in re: his last appeal should be confirmed any time now.
Putting It To Bed
The following are clarifications to the repetitive claims put forth by the landlord of MacFantasy Island.
1) Brian Murtagh was last involved in the handling (e.g., transported sealed evidentiary items to Paul Stombaugh) of evidence in 1974.
2) Michael Malone was last involved in the handling (e.g., microscopic hair and fiber analysis) of evidence in 1991.
3) The defense didn't put in a request for DNA testing until 1995.
4) The FBI's packaging of evidentiary items for DNA testing was undertaken in 1999.
5) Per the order of Judge Fox, this process was photographed and videotaped.
Despite the conspiracy claims leveled by the landlord of MacFantasy Island, the documented record proves beyond ALL doubt that neither Murtagh nor Malone had access to evidentiary items post-1995 request for DNA testing. The icing on the cake comes in the form of Fred Bost's comment to me during a phone conversation in 1999. Fred expressed to me that ALL of the significant hair exhibits were being DNA tested by the AFIP.
http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
The following are clarifications to the repetitive claims put forth by the landlord of MacFantasy Island.
1) Brian Murtagh was last involved in the handling (e.g., transported sealed evidentiary items to Paul Stombaugh) of evidence in 1974.
2) Michael Malone was last involved in the handling (e.g., microscopic hair and fiber analysis) of evidence in 1991.
3) The defense didn't put in a request for DNA testing until 1995.
4) The FBI's packaging of evidentiary items for DNA testing was undertaken in 1999.
5) Per the order of Judge Fox, this process was photographed and videotaped.
Despite the conspiracy claims leveled by the landlord of MacFantasy Island, the documented record proves beyond ALL doubt that neither Murtagh nor Malone had access to evidentiary items post-1995 request for DNA testing. The icing on the cake comes in the form of Fred Bost's comment to me during a phone conversation in 1999. Fred expressed to me that ALL of the significant hair exhibits were being DNA tested by the AFIP.
http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
Last edited:
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
Fred Bost didn't know anything about forensic fraud by the FBI and Murtagh, or about Mazerolle's fraud documentation with regard to his incarceration in various parts of the country.
Living In A Dream World
What does that statement even mean? This kind of conspiracy word salad speaks to the desperate measures employed by the landlord of MacFantasy Island. Not only does he speak for the now deceased Fred Bost, he takes credit for one of Bost's main talking points (e.g., massive cover-up involving the CID/FBI/DOJ).
In addition, he argues that Bost should have somehow figured out that all of Mazzerolle's court/corrections documents were forged. The landlord doesn't provide a stitch of proof as to how this was accomplished, but this is par for the course on MacFantasy Island.
He knows that he cannot dispute the timeline I constructed in my prior post, so his only option is to dip into the vague references pool. It seems that he usually stays in the shallow end for he rarely includes any corroborative data.
http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
What does that statement even mean? This kind of conspiracy word salad speaks to the desperate measures employed by the landlord of MacFantasy Island. Not only does he speak for the now deceased Fred Bost, he takes credit for one of Bost's main talking points (e.g., massive cover-up involving the CID/FBI/DOJ).
In addition, he argues that Bost should have somehow figured out that all of Mazzerolle's court/corrections documents were forged. The landlord doesn't provide a stitch of proof as to how this was accomplished, but this is par for the course on MacFantasy Island.
He knows that he cannot dispute the timeline I constructed in my prior post, so his only option is to dip into the vague references pool. It seems that he usually stays in the shallow end for he rarely includes any corroborative data.
http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
I don't know how exactly Fred Bost (or anyone else) could know about "forensic fraud" in this case since there was no such thing. I don't know how Fred Bost (or anyone else) could know about forged court/jail/bond records for Allen Mazzerole when the documentation is valid, certified, corroborated as correct and legal.
We have known for years that a certain poster really hates it when we insist on clouding the issue with facts. Yet, I am still surprised that he is allowed to insult good people and accuse honorable folks of illegal actions. What does it say about a person when they will argue "issues" that even the defense doesn't believe?
We have known for years that a certain poster really hates it when we insist on clouding the issue with facts. Yet, I am still surprised that he is allowed to insult good people and accuse honorable folks of illegal actions. What does it say about a person when they will argue "issues" that even the defense doesn't believe?
Amen!
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
There were about 71 people who were wrongly released from prison in the UK last year due to incorrect documentation. It's not something that is unknown out of America. Mazerolle's documentation about his incarcerations were a fraud. That is what Detective Beasley said publicly when he was alive. Mazerolle was out of prison on the night of the Macdonald murders and his so-called documentation was just to provide him with a cast iron alibi to fool journalists and the American public.
- Status