Jason Bermas Back-Pedelling.

[Garb]

I guess you are all this slow.

It flew on the north side of the citgo therefore the damage had to be caused by something else.

Unless you can show how the same damage could be created from a plane on the north side of the citgo.

Well where did the plane go if it flew on the North side?

It had to have hit something or else there would be testimony from the other side of the pentagon seeing it fly over.

 

[beachnut]

Yes.

We are on track for that.

You do know you guys have been set up for law suit. Do not sign any papers Lyte.

If you have signed up as a LC operative you will be sued with them.

Do you understand fraud? When people fake stuff and you publish it you are in trouble.

So you guys have been set up by the NSA and you will soon be running and hiding. Do you have enough money to hide from the NSA?

You guys are too easy! Good luck.

Now bring it on. Show us your stuff.

 

[Bell]

Are all of you pseudoskeptics this slow?

1. No

2. I never claimed to know the answer to this nor is it my responsibility to explain. We can prove the plane didn't hit the building. The rest of the explaining will be the job of the USG.

So it passed the Citgo station and? Pulled up and flew over the Pentagon?

Also, the 9/11 Commission has explained allready what happened to AA77... (SHILL!!)

Are you really that slow?

 

[Lyte Trip]

Is the damage you refer to the damage to the lightposts?

Yes.

And all of the physical damage including the trailer and the pentagon itself.

There is zero room for error in the official flight path.

 

[Scientologist]

Let's see this evidence that the airplane didn't hit the building or stfu thanks.

 

[Bell]

Yes.

And all of the physical damage including the trailer and the pentagon itself.

There is zero room for error in the official flight path.

So again I ask, how much room for error is there in your wittness acounts?

 

[Garb]

Yes.

And all of the physical damage including the trailer and the pentagon itself.

There is zero room for error in the official flight path.

Then if the physical damage reflects that of a 757 (which it does) then it couldn't have been something else.

 

[Pardalis]

Are you really that slow?

I think he's stalled.

 

[Lyte Trip]

Did this plane from the North hit the pentagon?

Since there is no physical damage that would indicate so....this would not be a logical conclusion.

 

[Pardalis]

Since there is no physical damage that would indicate so....this would not be a logical conclusion.

Then the plane came from the South of the Citgo. Thanks.

 

[Bell]

I think he's stalled.

Remember what happened when dust got into the groves of a record?

"We can proof it..."
*crack crack*
"We can proof it..."
*crack crack*
"We can proof it..."
*crack crack*
"We can proof it..."
*crack crack*

 

[pomeroo]

I agree with anyone who thinks that I was gentle, perhaps excessively so, with Les Jamieson. I don't feel, however, that a host should launch ad hominem attacks on his guests. If the boys actually show up, it is certain that they will make many untrue statements. Mark is superbly qualified to expose them and I won't hesitate to chime in. I will not sacrifice what I laughingly call my own dignity by slinging insults. The other side will, I assume, more than compensate for my decorum. Unless, of course, I happen to go berserk and start throwing chairs.

 

[TheGrunion]

Are all of you pseudoskeptics this slow?

1. No

2. I never claimed to know the answer to this nor is it my responsibility to explain. We can prove the plane didn't hit the building. The rest of the explaining will be the job of the USG.

Not so fast slick. You've already gone on record that what you are working on WILL account for the damage to the light poles.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2117360&postcount=1092

You must be having a rough time of it if you're moving the goal posts before kickoff!

 

[Bell]

Since there is no physical damage that would indicate so....this would not be a logical conclusion.

 

[Lyte Trip]

So again I ask, how much room for error is there in your wittness acounts?

Zero.

Due to their perfect vantage point, the credibility level of the witnesses themselves, and the multiple levels of corroboration that we have obtained.

Nobody will question it for even a second.

Not a single jrefer will be able to doubt it.

That's why as a courtesy we suggested you start working on an explanation as to how the damage could have been caused from a plane on the north side of the station.

 

[Garb]

Zero.

Due to their perfect vantage point, the credibility level of the witnesses themselves, and the multiple levels of corroboration that we have obtained.

Nobody will question it for even a second.

Not a single jrefer will be able to doubt it.

That's why as a courtesy we suggested you start working on an explanation as to how the damage could have been caused from a plane on the north side of the station.

How bout you give us your evidence then we will work on an explanation.

 

[Alt+F4]

Nobody will question it for even a second.

So what did cause the damage to the lightposts?

 

[Pardalis]

That's why as a courtesy we suggested you start working on an explanation as to how the damage could have been caused from a plane on the north side of the station.

Easy, it came from the South.

 

[Scientologist]

I agree with anyone who thinks that I was gentle, perhaps excessively so, with Les Jamieson. I don't feel, however, that a host should launch ad hominem attacks on his guests. If the boys actually show up, it is certain that they will make many untrue statements. Mark is superbly qualified to expose them and I won't hesitate to chime in. I will not sacrifice what I laughingly call my own dignity by slinging insults. The other side will, I assume, more than compensate for my decorum. Unless, of course, I happen to go berserk and start throwing chairs.

I didn't suggest you insult him. I suggested that everytime he lies, you call him on it.

You're a cool guy all together. Again, I'm not trying to offend you.

 

[Bell]

Zero.

Due to their perfect vantage point, the credibility level of the witnesses themselves, and the multiple levels of corroboration that we have obtained.

Nobody will question it for even a second.

Not a single jrefer will be able to doubt it.

That's why as a courtesy we suggested you start working on an explanation as to how the damage could have been caused from a plane on the north side of the station.

Freaking courtesy. You ask us to debunk something for which you fail time and again to show any evidence. You're a troll and hope we will bite. Try some real bait next time.