January Stundie Nominations

Can't resist this one from tempesta29 over in 9/11 CT.

tempesta29 said:
Severing columns near the ground level of a building will not even induce complete collapse let alone a collapse at gravitational acceleration.
Click to expand...

If you're near a Yellow Pages better phone to tell the CD companies they've been hallucinating all this time.
 
This is quite a subtle one from tempesta29, but it's worth thinking about.

tempesta29 said:
Now perhaps aluminum could have glowed somewhat at some point, but not 4 or 5 weeks after the initial WTC office fires.
Click to expand...

So he's saying that 4 to 5 weeks after the collapses, the rubble pile was hot enough to melt steel, but not hot enough to melt aluminium?

Dave
 
girlgye on Ickes
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=152169
I'm trying to get my head around the fact that there are real monsters eating unregistered babies (god if that was ever one reason for contract with admiralty there's one right there) in underground caverns.
The Mormon Church
Jehovahs Witnesses.

I can understand and verify the belief system of sacrificing babies and virgins young blonde girls/boys but thats what I thought was all it boiled down to .
Not that I'm minimising the heinous act of group satanic worship and sex rituals anyway.

quite another to accept there is some real species living amongst us isn't it?
Click to expand...

A fact????
 
jargon buster said:
girlgye on Ickes
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=152169


A fact????
Click to expand...



This is a better link:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059585006&postcount=3


And while we're at it, let's nominate this one from mfrey0118:

I can't help but wonder how many of these government-supporters would still be such if they knew most of those in alleged "authority" over us are crazy Luciferians who partake in bizarre and unconscionable rituals to maintain their power?
Click to expand...


Yes, if only we believed their nonsense, we'd agree with their worldview...:boggled:


http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059582517&postcount=2
 
An interesting point here is that apparently they believe the bizarre and unconscionable rituals to actually work.
 
Tempesta29
I never suggested debris didn't accumulate at all, but there is nothing to suggest that this mass is some growing entity. It isn't. Not only is mass going in all directions out of the path of collapse, but this upper section itself is being destroyed and losing some of its ability to exert force downward. We can't quantify how much mass is being added to this collapse, but we know three things: a lot of mass is being lost by these ejections, the upper section is losing ability to exert downward force as its destroyed, the upper section loses momentum every time it creates this new falling mass. And the bonus to it all is: the core structure gets larger and stronger as the collapse progresses.

I.e, there is nothing to suggest this collapsing mass is growing more powerful as it falls.
Click to expand...
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6748099&postcount=780
 
From the politics forum:
Sword_Of_Truth said:
Palin and Baldwin are essentially identical. They are both politically active TV personalities, neither of whom currently holds elective office.
Click to expand...
The most recent Republican VP candidate. One of the leading candidates for the next presidential election. One of the main voices of the Tea Party who has personally taken credit for must of the recent success of Tea Party supported candidates in the last election is the same, in your mind, as an actor, based on what he said 12 years ago.
 
DavidJames said:
From the politics forum:The most recent Republican VP candidate. One of the leading candidates for the next presidential election. One of the main voices of the Tea Party who has personally taken credit for must of the recent success of Tea Party supported candidates in the last election is the same, in your mind, as an actor, based on what he said 12 years ago.
Click to expand...


Needs to be CT related.
 
I'm still rather stunned after reading this post from ergo.

ergo said:
alienentity said:
Sites, to be technically correct. The debris is well outside the building footprint and reaches across several roads, in fact.
Click to expand...

And how does the horizontal debris spread show that the building did not fall straight down?
Click to expand...

I mean, really...
 
Ergo redefines the English language to defend a claim that has been proven wrong:

ergo said:
The "fall into its footprint" claim describes the building's smooth, symmetrical descent as a whole to the ground. It has nothing to do with the debris footprint.
Click to expand...
 
9/11 bee dunkers, claiming, in this thread, that the debris pile seen over the WTC7 site is not in fact largely over the WTC7 site, and that this picture "proves" that the building did "not fall straight down." :eye-poppi

WTC_7_aerial_photo.jpg
 
ergo said:
9/11 bee dunkers, claiming, in this thread, that the debris pile seen over the WTC7 site is not in fact largely over the WTC7 site, and that this picture "proves" that the building did "not fall straight down." :eye-poppi

[qimg]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6b/WTC_7_aerial_photo.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...


Your lack of understanding of the words that have been typed at you is appalling. I'd suggest that you stay in school, but I fear that would just be a drain on the taxpayers...
 
Last edited:
Travis, time to wrap up this month's nominations, the winner is in:

ergo said:
...
The "fall into its footprint" claim describes the building's smooth, symmetrical descent as a whole to the ground. It has nothing to do with the debris footprint.
Click to expand...

ETA: oops, uke2se beat me to it
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom