• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

January 2008 Stundie Nominations

lisabob2 finally did it:
in response to DavidJames

Originally Posted by DavidJames
Please provide your qualifications to determine if a source is right or wrong.

lisabob 2 said:
First of all you find the source. then you check to make sure it is accurate. Then if possible you can try to validate source.
Thats how I do it.
I guess my qualifications are that I can read. I can compare things and find similarities or differences. I can research.

This despite the inability to demonstrate an ability to determine what is "accurate"
 
On this video user 'bobo480' says:

hey i play the game rampage all the time and make buildings collapse
but rember its just a game
buildings cant collapse in real life
9/11 was a bobo job
 
Last edited:
I would like to nominate A-Train, for his assertion that...well, just see for yourself:



Link: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3306329&postcount=30

In other words, the Truth Movement's standard of "progress" is replacing one dumb theory with another, slightly less dumb theory.

The revolution is nigh!
soon those nutty controlled demolition and thermite theories will be weeded out and the inside jobbers will be on the run, yes, however slowly we will arrive at the truth
 
On this user's comment section, a wakenbake22 graces us with:

Please explain the black boxes of flight 77. The CVR data that was downloaded from the damaged box by FAA, then seized by FBI before data could be analyzed. The FDR animation from NIST that shows plane is too high to hit and not a match for the offical flight path. These 2 were found together at the entrance hole on the 14th around 4 a.m. under a never photographed pilot's seat with floor attached. Then explain the third mystery black box found at close to this same time at the c-ring hole, where ASCE report states it was found. Witness who found this box also claims to find bodies of crew members in uniforms and to have held the tail section in his hand, and it appears all of this was at the c-ring hole.

NIST, NTSB, what's the difference? :covereyes
 
For your consideration

LastChild in the "Brand New CT sub-group: No-Sounders" thread

Really? I thought you believed in magical microphones? How else did they all miss the same sound that at least one mic picked up loud and clear? Was the microphone stuck in the demolition charge only position? What was that you were saying about stupidity?
 
I've been gone for a bit (mountains of Mexico) and I'm just catching up, but I'm suprised no one has nominated this post yet:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=3309744#post3309744

Incapable of standing on their own?
Then architect must be lying when he says
"Parts of the core indeed stood for a few seconds after the rest of structure collapse, but were inherrently unstable - see my note about the interlinked nature of the structure previously."

Apparently, inherently unstable = able to stand on its own.
 
I know men always lie about size, but geez.

http://911blogger.com/node/13294#comment


How did flunky Hani Hanjour fly all the way back from Ohio/Kentucky, and why/how did he make those incredible acrobatics to hit the tiny, renovated section of the Pentagon?

The Pentagon is the largest office building in the world. That "tiny" section he is referring to is 921 feet wide.
 
lisabob2 again.
seems that the "squibs"came from specific locations on the towers, rather than fro other specific locations....
No I am saying there is no way air pressure would cause squibs from specific locations. If you watch CD's you will see squibs just like the squibs seen on 9-11. those squibs are from explosions, and they come from specific locations. Then after the building collapses you see where the air pressure created by the collapse come out from the lower levels. This air pressure event is widespread, not specific locations.
The squibs you see on CD's are not created by air pressure of the collapse. they are results of explosions. The squibs on the 3 wtc buildings look just like the squibs you see on normal CD's. If you watch videos of CD's then watch the 3 WTC collapses you'll see the same squibs caused by explosions at the normal CD's. You'll also see the air pressure caused widespread event at the lower levels near end of collapses.
 
lisabob2 again.
seems that the "squibs"came from specific locations on the towers, rather than fro other specific locations....

Troofers really love using the word "squibs", don't they? Same with thermite. I think that's part of the attraction for teenage males, they get to use cool sounding words that aren't familiar to the general public. It makes them feel that they've got knowledge of something secret. Nevermind the fact that they're using the word squibs incorrectly. It's not a term used in the CD industry.

Steve S.
 
Nevermind the fact that they're using the word squibs incorrectly. It's not a term used in the CD industry.

Steve S.
But it is a TV and movie term and as we all know, most of the science CTists know, comes from TV and the movies.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom