• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

jack smith deposition

while it’s true that jay isn’t the boss of you, again i think some familiarity with the case would give you extremely valuable context as to why tero’s comment you originally quoted isn’t saying what you think it is.
 
lawandcrime.com

Jack Smith report on Trump could be 'destroyed' after 'erroneous' Cannon decision: Court filing

Two groups have asked the 11th Circuit to order Judge Cannon to post a redacted copy of Volume II of Jack Smith's report on Mar-a-Lago.
lawandcrime.com lawandcrime.com

cannon and co trying to bury and then destroy vol 2 of jack smith’s investigation into election fraud, covering the stolen documents, making sure nobody will know its contents.

i’m really curious about what the stolen secret documents have to do with election fraud
 
dirtywick said:
www.legalish.me

Judge Cannon Permanently Suppresses the Smith Report in "Unopposed" Ruling — Unopposed Because Trump's Banner-Festooned DOJ Acted as His Personal Law Firm While Cannon Excluded Third Parties From the Case

Judge Cannon permanently bars the DOJ from releasing Volume II of the Smith report. The motions were "unopposed" because no one was permitted to oppose them.
www.legalish.me

cannon blocks smith report on mar a lago documents case, trump doj doesn’t oppose this
Click to expand...
What a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ surprise. The most corrupt administration ever.
 
i am really curious what relation the election fraud case and the documents case had
 
www.nbcnews.com

DOJ disclosed 'damning evidence' about Trump's procurement of classified documents, Judiciary Democrat says

A Jack Smith memo suggested Donald Trump took sensitive documents accessible to only six people in government and others pertaining to his business interests, Jamie Raskin said.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com

a little info about the mar a lago documents

In a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, Raskin alleged some of the documents, which had been sought by then-special counsel Jack Smith in his now-defunct classified documents case against Trump, were accessible only to six people in the government, and that the documents seemed to be relevant to the then-former president's business interests.
Click to expand...
 

jack smith says department of justice is corrupt

“We have a Department of Justice today that targets people for criminal prosecution simply because the president doesn’t like them,” Mr. Smith said in the hourlong discussion on April 20, according to a video obtained by The New York Times.

Mr. Smith, speaking in the deliberate cadence of a prosecutor delivering a closing argument, cited what he cast as the wholesale erosion of the department’s tradition of independence from the White House. “We have a department that fails to investigate cases because they might uncover facts that are inconvenient narratives the president would like to press,” he said.
Click to expand...
 
I'll never find it again, but I read something a few weeks ago in which a federal judge (formerly a federal prosecutor) dressed down a DOJ attorney in court for a particularly stupid filing. The gist of the admonishment was basically the same as Smith's opinion: in less than a year the Dept. of Justice has been downgraded from a once prestigious legal institution to a mere travesty. Maybe my pessimism is showing but I doubt that the department will regain its former stature in my lifetime, if ever.
 
dirtywick said:
www.newsweek.com

Donald Trump says fake electors scheme was "official act"

The Supreme Court has ruled that former presidents are immune from official acts undertaken during their presidencies.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com

trump legal defense of fake electors plot: it was an official act
Click to expand...
He can try. Constitutionally and statutorily the President has absolutely no role in running the Presidential election. The state electors vote, the votes are delivered to Congress, and the Vice President in his capacity as President of the Senate presides over the certification of the vote. It can't be an official act if your office can't act that way.
 
sorry, i just noticed that’s an old article. they got me, i need to check the dates. sometimes i forget to do that
 

jack smith's first public interview, talks about the investigation, the corruption of the department of justice and his optimism that it can be turned around, trump's threats against him, and the first amendment. doesn't talk about volume 2, the mar a lago documents aspect of his investigation, due to cannon's court order other than to say he stands by it's findings.
 

jack smith testifies before congress about trump’s efforts to overthrow the government. here’s a sample of the quality of the pushback against those accusations

The exchange between Senator Eric Schmitt of Missouri and Jack Smith was remarkable, featuring a U.S. senator publicly suggesting a former federal prosecutor committed perjury with his answers about whether he went to a 2024 basketball game. Smith tried to clear it up by saying he went to see the Iowa Hawkeyes play, not the Atlanta Hawks, and that the game was in Maryland, not Atlanta, but Schmitt was unrepentant about his original accusation.
Click to expand...


also a reminder that in addition to jan 6, smith’s investigation included the stolen documents at mar a lago, a case that he is unable to discuss and was buried by “judge” canon
 
dirtywick said:

jack smith testifies before congress about trump’s efforts to overthrow the government. here’s a sample of the quality of the pushback against those accusations




also a reminder that in addition to jan 6, smith’s investigation included the stolen documents at mar a lago, a case that he is unable to discuss and was buried by “judge” canon
Click to expand...
United States citizens paid for those investigations; we should by law be able to see what Smith found. ◊◊◊◊ Cannon.
 
Graham's nitwit sister weighs in:

https://twitter.com/x/status/2104972210607993060

Graham: Do you really believe Lindsey was going to destroy evidence that was not even in his possession?
Click to expand...

Smith: I believe your brother was a patriotic public servant. He was not a target of our investigation. In fact, he likely would have been a witness in our case. Your brother investigated the claims that Donald Trump was making. He found them to be false.
Click to expand...

Graham: I think you were just trying to bully my brother. You should be ashamed of yourself. Shame on you!
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom