Ok, lets sum up:
- Israel may have Anthrax
- Israel may have a motive
So, therefore, Israel did it.![]()
Did they shoot the missiles at WTC 7 as well?
I thought that was rays from space - somebody needs to get this stuff lined up for us.
Ok, lets sum up:
- Israel may have Anthrax
- Israel may have a motive
So, therefore, Israel did it.![]()
Did they shoot the missiles at WTC 7 as well?
Persons of Jewish descent, homosexuals or bisexuals, criminals, persons with a non-White spouse, dependent, or sexual partner, or persons with more than an undetectable trace of non-White ancestry are specifically barred from membership.
National Vanguard Membership Application
I'm sorry, how does this one work? I thought the US invaded Iraq because it was believed Iraq had WMD, they had what they believed was solid evidence.So if they were going to back up this Intel with a false flag operation i.e. an anthrax attack,why did they not make sure it was known that Iraq was responsible? Why if you are going to go to all the trouble of staging anthrax attacks on yourself would the USG not sell the story straight away it was Iraq?
No it is not.You do realise that this is completely baseless.
After 9/11 the speculation in the media was that the next attack would be bioterrorism.
Then the anthrax attacks hit. The entire nation was terrorized. Then about a year later the neocons–who are mouthpieces for Israel–start talking about attacking Iraq because that country has WMDs. You get the picture.
After 9/11 the speculation in the media was that the next attack would be bioterrorism.
Then the anthrax attacks hit. The entire nation was terrorized. Then about a year later the neocons–who are mouthpieces for Israel–start talking about attacking Iraq because that country has WMDs. You get the picture.
Israel launched the anthrax attacks because they thought they could get away with it like their attack on the USS Liberty in 1967.
It was all part of a plot to get the US to go to war with Israel’s enemies in the Mideast. Now they was the US to attack Iran.
Israel launched the anthrax attacks because they thought they could get away with it like their attack on the USS Liberty in 1967.
Israel takes the US to be a bunch of suckers.
No, they did not.
The anthrax attacks used non-military anthrax, weaponized in a reasonably effective but decidedly amateur fashion. This pretty much rules out your hypothesis.
You misspelled "moron." It doesn't have a p, a, t, or i in it.
More revealing than the electrostatic charge, some experts say, was a technique used to anchor silica nano-particles to the surface of spores. About a year and a half ago, a laboratory analyzing the Senate anthrax spores for the FBI reported the discovery of what appeared to be a chemical additive that improved the bond between the silica and the spores. U. S. intelligence officers informed foreign biodefense officials that this additive was "polymerized glass." The officials who received this briefing-- biowarfare specialists who work for the governments of two NATO countries-- said they had never heard of polymerized glass before. This was not surprising. "Coupling agents" such as polymerized glass are not part of the usual tool kit of scientists and engineers making powders designed for human inhalation. Also known as "sol gel" or "spin-on-glass," polymerized glass is "a silane or siloxane compound that's been dissolved in an alcohol- based solvent like ethanol," says Jacobsen. It leaves a thin glassy coating that helps bind the silica to particle surfaces.
It was all part of a plot to get the US to go to war with Israel’s enemies in the Mideast. Now they was the US to attack Iran.
Israel launched the anthrax attacks because they thought they could get away with it like their attack on the USS Liberty in 1967.
Israel takes the US to be a bunch of suckers.
If applied scrupulously, that means no-one but one or two hetero albinos with albino wives and children are eligible for membership. That's a pretty short list, I suspect!Persons of Jewish descent, homosexuals or bisexuals, criminals, persons with a non-White spouse, dependent, or sexual partner, or persons with more than an undetectable trace of non-White ancestry are specifically barred from membership.
Can't tell you why that's wrong, but it is - unless you just mean on paper/in media.
Maybe Saddam broke the peace tready when he shot at my buddies flying in the no fly zone. Do you think breaking a peace agreement is good?
But then you do not bring facts. He shot at the British planes too. Darn more reasons to hang Saddam. I wonder what the Kurds think about your ideas?
Saddam had anthrax, maybe he did it. Did we luck out?
If applied scrupulously, that means no-one but one or two hetero albinos with albino wives and children are eligible for membership. That's a pretty short list, I suspect!
I don't often dis people on this forum, but this is worthy of it:
MaGZ, YOU ARE A BRAINLESS DORK. You have nothing.
Really?
Wasn't the decision to invade Iraq taken before 911?
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/10/oneill.bush/
They were at war. It was a tragic accident. Ever heard of friendly fire?
Why exactly do you think Israel would have attacked the US on purpose during the six day war? And what E.V.I.D.E.N.C.E. do you have?
Tell that to the crew of the USS Liberty and read the book "Assault on the Liberty".