We always prefer to keep the identifying data (ie; the names) of applicants private. It is not our policy to provide applicants with public embarrassment past the personal embarrassment of having failed preliminary testing, which so many applicants do with such boldly flying colors. That is to say, zero hits out of ten attempts is not at all uncommon.
Personally, I don't feel that laughing at the self-deluded, or mocking their attempts to prove their beliefs, helps anyone,
and entertainment is simply not a part of our activities. There's more than enough to laugh at in the world without adding the names of a thousand failed applicants to the list.
I would much prefer to mock the people who try win the million dollars by means of deception, but, as I previously stated, those folks simply don't apply for the prize. They know better. Hence, I rarely get the opportunity to point and laugh.
BUT, I do on ocassion get a claim letter that provides a good-natured belly laugh. And, since the archive I've promised
in my previous postings is still a few weeks away from being introduced, I will try to satiate you all with the following teaser - a claim that I have received each week since shortly after I arrived here (so glaringly simple and to-the-point, as per the prize rules) via fax, email and postal service, from a fellow in Brighton, England:
"ANY DOG, OF ANY BREED, WHATEVER ITS SIZE AND NO MATTER HOW WILD, WILL NOT BITE ME."
The funniest thing about this particular claim is that it is not the
original claim received from this fellow. His initial claim differs slightly from the above claim (which I began to receive a week or two later), arriving the very day I began to work here at JREF. And here is the original claim:
"NO LION, WHATEVER ITS SIZE AND NO MATTER HOW WILD, WILL BITE ME."
Now we all know that Brighton is simply rife with lions, yet still, somehow this applicant was perceptive enough to see the difficulty in providing a forum in which his claim could be tested, and soon abandoned his initial claim, providing a new one with precisely the same wording, save one key word: "lion" had been replaced by "dog". I think the lion test would have proved infinitely more amusing, but, alas.
He seems quite entirely serious about his claim, and although I am not without experience in detecting good humour (I also worked for Penn & Teller for many years), I couldn't perceive any sense of the absurd at work here, at least not from his end.
Randi's suggestion for a reply surpassed even the claim itself for humorous content: "Fine. Tell him to advise us as to when he has gathered all the dogs in the world together in one place, and we can then schedule a test."
This particular claim has won my 'Claim of the Week' prize each and every week since my arrival here in early March.
But don't get funny with me; there is no cash prize involved in this private competition, so keep your shirts on, forumites.
"The professors can remain in their seats. There'll be no diving for THIS cigar!" - Groucho Marx