Notice that the politicians we elect are "leading" us, unless you believe CFR/Bilderbergers/whomever are doing that job.
I don't know if what we have now, and I mean on either side of the aisle, can be referred to as leadership.
Notice that the politicians we elect are "leading" us, unless you believe CFR/Bilderbergers/whomever are doing that job.
I agree, sheesh applecorped, don't sell yourself short.
I would say both have above average intelligence. Maybe higher than a lot of people who like to say how stupid Bush and Palin are.
I would say both have above average intelligence. Maybe higher than a lot of people who like to say how stupid Bush and Palin are.
As we say around here, evidence? Plenty? Nope.She's stupid. For those who think she's not just becaus she was elected and still is making money as a political speaker, I say that's not evidence of intelligence. There are plenty of stupid people that have reached political and financial success.
I am with Meadmaker and Resume on this one. Calling either of them stupid requires a redefining of the word stupid.
"Stupid" Bush somehow outmaneuvered Democrats for eight years. When their grades finally came out, Bush had a higher GPA than the Dems intellectual candidate Kerry.
I have no doubt you and most here are more intelligent than Palin or GWB. Yet, there they are, effecting reality, and here you (and I) are, effecting nothing.
Laugh a bit more.

Meanwhile, GWB has a Harvard MBA. I'm confident that he wouldn't have gotten into that program without his father and grandfather's influence. However, I'm fairly confident that that wouldn't be enough to get him a diploma. He can't be as dumb as we sometimes make him out to be.
"Stupid" Bush somehow outmaneuvered Democrats for eight years. When their grades finally came out, Bush had a higher GPA than the Dems intellectual candidate Kerry. "Stupid" Palin continues to know how to manage the media better than most Dems. Sure, she is the exact opposite of worldly but she is canny and canny is a component of intelligence.
Sarah Palin's spouse never accidentally killed someone.
They sure affect you, but to little positive effect.If we're going by who's "effecting[sic]" things ...
ETA: If we're going by who's "effecting[sic]" things more than myself right now, you could also say that David Duke, Rosie O'Donnell, and Prince Harry in Britain (not listed together for any reason) must be worthwhile as well. I mean, nevermind that one's a raging racist scumbag, one's a loudmouthed cling-on who got famous riding coat-tails of others, and one is notable only for the uncontrollable stroke of luck that was being born to British royalty.
I don't believe you recognize intelligence when you see it. What do you suggest Oprah uses to effect things, or to keep you happy, affect people to great effect?Indeed, and I think we can all agree that Oprah isn't exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer.![]()
And they do not try to learn. When someone tries to correct them, they just confabulate some evil intent or disloyalty on that person's part.