Please, by all means, explain what the correct context of your statement was. Here it is again:

you are so wasting my time by forcing me to repeat myself. Fine, here we go.
OK, I will AGAIN !!!
READ THIS TIME SO I DON'T HAVE TO KEEP REPEATING MYSELF
Islam is not like Chirstianity. All the leaders of each Christian sects insist that the Bible is not to be interpreted literally.
It is not like that with the Quran.
Lots of Chirstians do not take all the violent evil stuff in the Bible literally anymore.
It is not like that with Islam and the Quran. The Quran really is thought to be the literal word of God, as in it came from God's mouth. So if the Quran bashes gays, or anyone else, it is rational for Muslims to feel that if they hang homosexuals, like they do in Iran, it makes God happy.
And this is why Islam beats Christianity in the gay bashing rhelm, hands down
I have explained this already. You insist I do it again. I did it again. Explain why do I give you this much respect when you do not have the respect to go back and find where I had already explained this? Do you consider yourself to be an ingrate?
Is this how you intend to gain the upper hand in this debate? You intend to do a treasure hunt for something you can pull out of context and make an issue out of? And then ask me to explain it again and again and again and again and again until I get tired and you feel you have accomplished something by attrition when all you have done is demonstrate the extent that you can be annoying?
Then you can explain how the correct context is effected by the fact that your statement is false.
Yes I can. That is a true statement you made right there. Congrats.