Firegarden
Pity you didn't read more. Ingersoll's description of the Church, cited by you, is accurate as regards the 19th century Catholic Church, and other powerful Christian Churches. But he is even-handed in his criticisms:
And the general tone of the piece as a whole is positive and conciliatory, as anyone will see who, undaunted by your disparagement, reads more than a few words of it.
Pity you didn't read more. Ingersoll's description of the Church, cited by you, is accurate as regards the 19th century Catholic Church, and other powerful Christian Churches. But he is even-handed in his criticisms:
If we had been born in England, surrounded by wealth and clothed with power, most of us would have been Episcopalians, and believed in church and state. .. Had we been born in Turkey, most of us would have been Mohammedans and believed in the inspiration of the Koran. ... If some man had denied this story we should probably have denounced him as a dangerous person, one who was endeavoring to undermine the foundations of society, and to destroy all distinction between virtue and vice. .. We would have pointed out to him the fact that thousands had been consoled in the hour of death by passages from the Koran; that they had died with glazed eyes brightened by visions of the heavenly harem, and gladly left this world of grief and tears. We would have regarded Christians as the vilest of men, and on all occasions would have repeated "There is but one God, and Mohammed is his prophet!"
And the general tone of the piece as a whole is positive and conciliatory, as anyone will see who, undaunted by your disparagement, reads more than a few words of it.
