BasqueArch
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 1,871
The (or steel) indicates they think the iron spheres are a product of steel melting.
If they meant something other than "bulk' iron (or steel) they would have said so.
Incorrect. RJLee did say so:
Rust and iron flakes, not bulk iron or steel.What about the iron microspheres? The iron has a thin layer of rust flakes that can be easily removed by sticky tape. ... The iron flakes are liberated as small particles and some iron is vaporized. Like drops of water, the iron flakes form molten spheres that solidify and the fume also condenses into spheres, the most efficient geometrical form. Incidentally, iron is not the only material that formed spheres during the event. Some building material is made of minerals containing aluminum and silicon and alumino‐silicate spheres were also observed in the dust
RJLee will be misinterpreted by conspiracists because he works for a living in the real world of results and is not versed in the marginal mined-parsed not-the-truth conspiracy lingo.
What we know so far:
1. The Bentham chips are paint, not thermxte. Therefore the discovered spheres/vapor were caused by the fires and/or were preexisting.
2, Evidence from MSW incinerators show ferrosperes and lead vapor created at substantially lower than the melting temperature of bulk steel/iron and substantially lower than bulk lead vaporizing temperature. Temperatures achieved at the TT and subsequent pile fires.
3. Evidence from the printer's link quoted before shows ferrospheres produced at between 200C-400C. Research in nano-materials show substantially lower temperatures than bulk metals, in the hundreds of degreesC, for the melting of metals in relation to their particle size.
This scientific evidence will not convince the conspiracists strong Believer faith because not-the-truth epistemology is Metaphysical/Political.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=8069529#post8069529
Last edited:
