Invitation for Java Man to discuss his 9/11 theory

bump2.jpg


For Java Man. He seems to be avoiding this thread for some reason.......

What ever could that reason be??
 
Java Man said:
1- isn't that the purpose of "defense"?

2- you've proven that quite well yourselves, by stating for example that NIST never investigated, modeled or studied beyond the collapse initiation.
Click to expand...
1 - there was no defense of hijacking, for the military; looks like you lack knowledge on the military and hijacking. It seems if you are going to make up nonsense on 911, you would at least study the subject area. And there were no plans to shoot down airliners, that is what military states do, not a civilian run countries set up with rules on how the military is used. History, does 911 truth know why we have a civilian controlled military? Any clue? no
This is cool, after someone is dead, we know the cause, now we have to investigate the afterlife. Good one; you must not understand after initiation, there was collapse, there is no need to study the collapse. Please explain why we would study collapse. Are you an engineer too?
 
Last edited:
Oystein said:
We had this little exchannge on september 29th - four days ago:
Oystein said:
Java Man said:
An abstract, that's a great though. I think I can come up with that in a day's time. Do you want a trailer too?
Click to expand...
Abstract will be great, thanks! I can wait a day. In fact, I can wait four days, as I'll travel to Switzerland tomorrow and until sunday! :)
Click to expand...

I am now back from my travels.

No abstract. No theory. No nothing. And Java Man is letting mass murderers run free.
Click to expand...

Bumped for Java Man.

Reminder: On september 29th, 2010, you kinda announced an abstract for a paper you were going to write.
Topic was:

Java Man said:
...
Now we are getting close to me presenting a complete theory to your consideration. Time allowing for me to write it down, so be patient. I just hope we can continue to have a mature conversation like we've been having up to now.
Click to expand...

Java Man: Where is your "complete theory", or are you ready now to admit that you never had one?
 
aggle-rithm said:
Did the theory have something to do with the intellectual dishonesty of truthers? Because he's provided a wealth of supporting evidence.
Click to expand...

Oh it's got everything to do with the intellectual dishonesty of truthers. That's why I dropped classic truther theories and replaced them with debunker arguments. Now the theory is more solid, based on the official report and above all actually supported by debunkers.
 
Java Man said:
Oh it's got everything to do with the intellectual dishonesty of truthers. That's why I dropped classic truther theories and replaced them with debunker arguments. Now the theory is more solid, based on the official report and above all actually supported by debunkers.
Click to expand...

So, when will we be seeing your "updated" theory?
 
Java Man said:
Oh it's got everything to do with the intellectual dishonesty of truthers. That's why I dropped classic truther theories and replaced them with debunker arguments. Now the theory is more solid, based on the official report and above all actually supported by debunkers.
Click to expand...

What theory are you referring to?
 
Java Man said:
...Now the theory is more solid...
Click to expand...

Which theory?

We have been asking you to spell out at least an outline for over 4 months now.
Will you excuse me if I think you are a liar and don't actually have a theory? You must admit that your failure to spell out your theory 4 months after you stated that you could do it within a day looks an awful lot like you are running away from admitting that you just lied.
 
Oystein said:
Which theory?

We have been asking you to spell out at least an outline for over 4 months now.
Will you excuse me if I think you are a liar and don't actually have a theory? You must admit that your failure to spell out your theory 4 months after you stated that you could do it within a day looks an awful lot like you are running away from admitting that you just lied.
Click to expand...

Why did he come back for another thrashing?
 
I think I have gleaned the theory from some of his posts in other threads.

His theory is that the NIST report is essentially correct, but there are ommissions that protect the perpetrators.

Just before the collapse of each tower, the floors above the collapse zone were released by some mechanism, possibly a very small amount of explosives, possibly something else. The weight of the floors caused the floor at the point of collapse to sag, pulling in the outer columns and initiating collapse.

His theory states that all the engineers who conducted their own studies somehow failed to notice telltale signs that floors were collapsing inside, because they weren't looking for this.

Also, the investigators who painstakingly sorted through the rubble didn't find the mechanisms for releasing the floors because they weren't looking for them.

The internal collapse of the floors, he has said, had to be deliberate because otherwise they would have been in the NIST report.

I'll leave the reader to sort out the logic of that last part.

ALTERNATIVE THEORY: Insurance fraud by money-grubbing Jews.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom