Merged Interesting Analysis of Changing Media Attitudes toward 9/11 Alternative Theories

Now you're skipping the rolleyes and going straight to lying like a truther.

BTW, this is a link to my post where I copied the question straight from Zogby. Not Your link to your own post where you cut the question out.

You people just can't stand others revealing information that you don't want people to know, do you?

Why do truthers spend so much time trying to hide information, Ergo?

Not to defend ergo and hopefully you'll excuse my skepticism but your interpretation of opinion polls had been a little less than reliable in the past.

The question you copied in your link is from a Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll conducted in 2006, not a Zogby poll.

You do in the link go on to quote a Zogby poll that you summarize thusly.

Official Story: 63.6%
LIHOP: 26.4%
MIHOP: 4.6%
NS: 5.4%

Just wanted to clear that up. Do you still believe 61 per cent of democrats are or were at some point truthers, btw? You never did clarify your opinion on that.

Edit:

August 2006: 16% believe the WTC was brought down in a controlled demolition

August 2007: 4.6% believe WTC was CD'ed

How do you explain 34 million Americans leaving your movement in just 12 months?

The 2007 poll was the Zogby poll. The 4.6% number was MIHOP. Was there a WTC was a CD question in the poll? If so, you didn't quote it.
 
Last edited:
Not to defend ergo and hopefully you'll excuse my skepticism but your interpretation of opinion polls had been a little less than reliable in the past.

And you have a history of deliberately lying about the content of other forum members posts.

The 2007 poll was the Zogby poll. The 4.6% number was MIHOP. Was there a WTC was a CD question in the poll? If so, you didn't quote it.

Question asked and answered.
 
Last edited:
And you have a history of deliberately lying about the content of other forum members posts.

So you do believe 61 per cent of democrats are or were at some point truthers? Odd that you never defended that contention in the first place. Would you care to do so now? It's been over a year but the thread were I took you to task for that creative interpretation of polling data is still active. This is your belated change to show me how your original analysis was right and my critique was wrong.
 
Last edited:
meh. I'd be willing to bet that my daughter's junior high school play gets more publicity than AE911...

I would take that bet. You may have more people attend your junior high school play. My kids school hall can accommodate about 800 and I am sure we will get nothing like that.... but I bet you that we will have more publicity.

I bet you we beat you 5 to 1 on Youtube. We might be small but we are loud!
 
I would take that bet. You may have more people attend your junior high school play. My kids school hall can accommodate about 800 and I am sure we will get nothing like that.... but I bet you that we will have more publicity.

I bet you we beat you 5 to 1 on Youtube. We might be small but we are loud!

Comedy is very popular on Youtube.
 
Odd that you never defended that contention in the first place.

Given that it was brought up by someone who was himself lying about the content of other posts I had made, I saw no point in defending against a hypocrite who apparently believed such behavior was his own exclusive domain.
 
I would take that bet. You may have more people attend your junior high school play. My kids school hall can accommodate about 800 and I am sure we will get nothing like that.... but I bet you that we will have more publicity.

I bet you we beat you 5 to 1 on Youtube. We might be small but we are loud!

so, it's better to be talked about, than not be talked about at all?
 
Well, I'd prefer you were right, but if loud is what you're after then cool.

No I am right. And I am right by being loud.

Despite more people attending a typical high school play than one could reasonably expect will attend any ae911truth demo on the 10th anniversary. I am sure that the ae911truth demo (demonstration) will attract more publicity by almost any means you can measure.

Newspaper articles
Number of hits ( physical and metaphysical)
Ranking of web sites
Youtube videos
TV news
Interviews
discussions on Randi
etc

the discussion was about publicity, and we are pretty good at that, and punch well above our weight
 
No I am right. And I am right by being loud.

Despite more people attending a typical high school play than one could reasonably expect will attend any ae911truth demo on the 10th anniversary. I am sure that the ae911truth demo (demonstration) will attract more publicity by almost any means you can measure.

Newspaper articles
Number of hits ( physical and metaphysical)
Ranking of web sites
Youtube videosTV news
Interviews
discussions on Randi
etc

the discussion was about publicity, and we are pretty good at that, and punch well above our weight

Nope. Youtube is pretty much the only thing truthers got.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom