• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

IndoctriNATION movie

What is with the sweetie?

It's a proper noun; you do know what a proper noun is, don't you?

He finally asked a direct question.

"He" has asked many. The fact that you choose to ignore a question does not mean it has not been asked.

Nor have you answered any of them...

If this is about the way I argue it, then it is about me. There isn't any reason to bring your high strung emotions into this argument. If your going to continue Whining about how I argue, we're certainly not going to get far, which is probably your goal.

Um...no. You would profit from reading the MA.

As an example, your personification of "high strung[sic] emotions" is about me, not my argument. Your unsupported accusation of "whining" is about me, not my argument. Your personal question about my sexual orientation was about me, not my argument (and you never did answer my question about why you wanted to know).

Your apologia is not you, nor is pointing out that you cover a lack of preparation by avoiding, or trying to deflect, questions for which you have no pat answer "about you", biut about your argument.

Did you ever realize to what Pixel 42 was referring, and address the issue?
 
Look back to where you state that you would do as "you see fit" (despite, evidently, the MA you signed, and the tenets of your MJ).

Your pose of innocence does you dispraise.

I'm not looking at anything, where did I change your words?
 
I'm not looking at anything, where did I change your words?

Oh, I know, sweetie.

You will do as "you see fit", despite the conventions of intellectual honesty, the traditions of civil discourse, the terms of the MA, and the tenets about honesty attributed to your MJ...

Just don't alter my posts again without admitting that you have so done.
 
It's a proper noun; you do know what a proper noun is, don't you?

Yes, but it is usually directed at me by women or gay men.


"He" has asked many. The fact that you choose to ignore a question does not mean it has not been asked.

Nor have you answered any of them...

All I've done is answer questions



As an example, your personification of "high strung[sic] emotions" is about me, not my argument. Your unsupported accusation of "whining" is about me, not my argument. Your personal question about my sexual orientation was about me, not my argument
Lol
(and you never did answer my question about why you wanted to know).
Because I like to know who is calling me sweetie.
Your apologia is not you, nor is pointing out that you cover a lack of preparation by avoiding, or trying to deflect, questions for which you have no pat answer "about you", biut about your argument.

If I have "no pat answer" doesn't that tell you I've been answering questions? ;) It doesn't seem to move anything forward dealing with you.
Did you ever realize to what Pixel 42 was referring, and address the issue?
Yes
 
Oh, I know, sweetie.

You will do as "you see fit", despite the conventions of intellectual honesty, the traditions of civil discourse, the terms of the MA, and the tenets about honesty attributed to your MJ...

Funny to see you post about traditions of civil discourse while calling someone sweetie. LOL
Just don't alter my posts again without admitting that you have so done.

First you'll have to show where I altered your post.
 
No, I'll continue to be a witness for Christ, you'll just have to deal with it. ;)

The mythical Jesus was a good soldier too, and was rewarded by being flogged and nailed to a cross to fulfill the compulsive "atonement" requirement. When he asked for mercy, there was silence in Heaven. Jesus was left with no choice except to state the inevitable - "Your will be done".

If the mythical Son of God can't avoid torture...

Well, good luck to you.

Edited to add: If the Messiah prophesy had been fulfilled, then the Messiah wouldn't need any witnesses. He would be here, now, on the planet, ruling it. And there would be no suffering, and no death. If the prophesy had been fulfilled. But unfortunately, "Behold I come quickly" has now stretched into two millenia.
 
Last edited:
The mythical Jesus was a good soldier too, and was rewarded by being flogged and nailed to a cross to fulfill the compulsive "atonement" requirement. When he asked for mercy, there was silence in Heaven. Jesus was left with no choice except to state the inevitable - "Your will be done".

Yes, there won't be any excuse when you meet him.
If the mythical Son of God can't avoid torture...

Well, good luck to you.

Um, I'm not going to be tortured.
Edited to add: If the Messiah prophesy had been fulfilled, then the Messiah wouldn't need any witnesses. He would be here, now, on the planet, ruling it. And there would be no suffering, and no death. If the prophesy had been fulfilled. But unfortunately, "Behold I come quickly" has now stretched into two millenia.
His timing not yours.
 
Yes, but it is usually directed at me by women or gay men.

Proper nouns are usually directed at you by women or gay men? What an interesting life you lead...

All I've done is answer questions

...except for the ones about what you, personally, think "liberal", and "leftist" mean, among others...

Care to take a bash at that one?

Lol

Because I like to know who is calling me sweetie.

I see. Now you are claiming to be clairvoyant. You know what your book of fairy tales says about diving spirits...

(FTR, you asked me about my sexual orientation a long time before I ever started respectfully addressing you by a proper noun of address.)

If I have "no pat answer" doesn't that tell you I've been answering questions? ;) It doesn't seem to move anything forward dealing with you.

Yes

What is a "leftist", in your sagacious opinion?

What is a "liberal", ditto?

Start there, sweetie.
 
Last edited:
Funny to see you post about traditions of civil discourse while calling someone sweetie. LOL

Do you find "sweetie" uncivil? Is it less civil than the demonstrably flase tags of "liberal", "leftist", and "sexual pervert"?


First you'll have to show where I altered your post.

Just don't do it again, sweetie.
 
How is it that dishonest dealings and equivocation "witness" for your MJ?

What are my dishonest dealings and equivocation?

Funny I've answered yours and others questions as honestly and straight forward as I'm able and yet you label me with that. There really isn't a point in arguing with you.

The God of the universe changed my life and that of many others, I'll continue to worship him and tell others about him.
 
Proper nouns are usually directed at you by women or gay men? What an interesting life you lead...



...except for the ones about what you, personally, think "liberal", and "leftist" mean, among others...

Care to take a bash at that one?



I see. Now you are claiming to be clairvoyant. You know what your book of fairy tales says about diving spirits...

(FTR, you asked me about my sexual orientation a long time before I ever started respectfully addressing you by a proper noun of address.)



What is a "leftist", in your sagacious opinion?

What is a "liberal", ditto?

Start there, sweetie.

This whole post is just stupid, is there any reason to continue with you?
 
Do you find "sweetie" uncivil? Is it less civil than the demonstrably flase tags of "liberal", "leftist", and "sexual pervert"? Did I call you a liberal? Sexual Pervert?

Yes you are quite uncivil.



Just don't do it again, sweetie.
You don't even have the courage to put up the post that you say I altered.
 
What are my dishonest dealings and equivocation?

Funny I've answered yours and others questions as honestly and straight forward as I'm able and yet you label me with that. There really isn't a point in arguing with you.

What, in your idiosyncratic opinion, is a "liberal"?

What, in your idiosyncratic opinion, is a "leftist"?

WHy do you continue to avoif the promise your MJ is said to be said to have said to his audience about when he would "return"?

How, in your idiosyncratic opinion, would the crucifiction (had it happened) not have been "political"?

The God of the universe changed my life and that of many others, I'll continue to worship him and tell others about him.

And to that, you are welcome. Go tell it on the mountain. Here, the gaping holes in your stories will be pointed out. As they have been.

Why do you feel the need to flavour your worship and witness with screed about the "sexual perversions of the 'left' "? Why do you feel the need to resort to apologia to gloss over the hard bits and the contradictions? Why do you feel justified trying to enforce your superstition as law upon others?
 
Yes you are quite uncivil.

Whereas, of course, unsupported (and undefined) calumnies such as "leftist", "liberal", and "sexual pervert" are examples of the divine love taught by your MJ. I guess...

You don't even have the courage to put up the post that you say I altered.

No, dear, I don't "say" you altered anything.

You misquoted me. Do not do it again.
 

Back
Top Bottom