Barney Gumble
New Blood
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2010
- Messages
- 2
My wife was raised a Buddhist and still is a strict Buddhist, we have a large shrine in our dining room. All this garbage is news to her.
Let me guess High River; you haven't witnessed any of this yourself but you know it is true cos Buddhists can't lie, right?
Let me guess High River; you haven't witnessed any of this yourself but you know it is true cos Buddhists can't lie, right?
I suggest you try some common sense yourself. Your "logic" is leading you down the wrong direction.
I'll just say that I think you are so unthinking and innocent and believing that some day at some time, someone will trick you out of a lot of your money. You are the perfect target for every confidence trickster in the world. Don't say you haven't been warned!Uh...I really do not know the situation in the United States, but Buddhists mustn't lie is a common sense in China.
Uh...I really do not know the situation in the United States, but Buddhists mustn't lie is a common sense in China.
Buddhist are permitted to lie and often do. They believe small lies to 'save face' whether yours or someone else is appropriate.
Perhaps this explains High River's little fairy tale, the monks are having a laugh at High River's expense.
Everybody lies.Uh...I really do not know the situation in the United States, but Buddhists mustn't lie is a common sense in China.
Well...But I think that every body can never lies.
Remember, I'm the reincarnation of Buddha. Are you really going to argue with Buddha?Well...But I think that every body can never lies.
Well...But I think that every body can never lies.
You all misunderstood my meanings.I just means I think every body can never lies.
Italics does not add meaning to gibberish or correct wrong statements.
I'm sorry to the statement with ambiguity.
I meant that I think that one passed away can no longer lying.
I'm sorry to the statement with ambiguity.
I meant that I think that one passed away can no longer lying.
Key question: Are you a shark?
It seems that I did not explain clearly.My meaning is that things are characterized to "things", but "things" is not really exist.
How can we recognize things? We use characters such as color,smell,taste,sound shape,component,ect. to distinguish things. Then we know this thing is this thing, that thing is that thing.
But in Buddhism theory, something characterized does not exist and characteristics do not exist either.
ETA:http://www.foyuan.net/plus/view.php?aid=96144&pageno=8
Of course the dead ones are still lying. Do you expect them to sit upright after they're dead?I'm sorry to the statement with ambiguity.
I meant that I think that one passed away can no longer lying.
So dead people can't tell new lies? Sure. But the ones still living can. I don't see your point.