Illegal Immigrants Plan to Boycott May 1

That doesn't sound too unreasonable on its face. But which state services? I'm all for getting these people, if they're to remain illegal, licensed up and insured. Cool. But what about emergency rooms? Are we to allow hepatitis or tuberculosis epidemics in our poor communities because we've barred the illegals among them from the hospitals? Leaving aside any actual facts or moral implications, that doesn't sound very cost-effective.

Just thinking aloud here. Emergency services shouldnt be turned down, but certainly deportation could be arranged after the person has been stabilized? This IS a drain, it is a big one. An attempt to get mexico to help with the cost of illegals in Arizona emergency rooms was already denied. In this emergency care case I think its perfectly reasonable and logical that we just CANT afford it

Realated to this, I propose that just because someone tressapasses onto our soil and has a baby, that does NOT make that baby a US citizen and by extension, its parents.

There are two giant chunks of money and crime ended right there as far as I can see

Now for the MUCH stickier problem you brought up. For many illegals, the hospital is the primary health care provider, even for colds, toothache, etc. Because of the drain on the economy they have caused, among other factors it is also many US citizens primary health care provider. We cant afford to service both. I dont know what to do about this besides deportation, or another attempt to get mexico to pay for some of it

A big fat ugly problem is that there really IS a huge criminal infrastructure here. I could take you to people who's main source of income is stealing identities from citizens and selling them to illegals. You cant say using these false documents you know were stolen from another person is NOT a criminal activity.

I can take you to people who will teach you, and provide the documents for you to get multiple welfare accounts as a non citizen

I can even take you to doctors who use illegal tresspasser patients to milk car insurance companies for bogus medical bills. Maybe I could even get a picture of the chart that shows you what the doctor's cut for an injury is and what yours is. I have seen it myself and called the police.

These fish are caught and released, over and over

A trip to 32nd Street and Mcdowell in phoenix will get you five or six offers of stolen identities, welfare cheating help and coyote services. The police know this yet nothing seems to be done as there is no will to enforce these laws
 
Nice attempt to deflect, though, racist.

You're the one using racial epithets, not me. What's next - going to rail against affirmative action, talking about "uppity n*****s?"
Wow, are you stupid or disingenuous? He was obviously writing from the point of view of an hypothetical "they took our jerbs!!" racist. It seems you're just looking at an excuse to ignore his points.

It's as if I said, "that skinhead does not like 'em damn kikes, and accuse the damn kikes of controlling the media" - by your logic, *I* would be the one making the racial epithets, instead of using them to make a point. Stupid, stupid.
 
Wow, are you stupid or disingenuous? He was obviously writing from the point of view of an hypothetical "they took our jerbs!!" racist. It seems you're just looking at an excuse to ignore his points.

It's as if I said, "that skinhead does not like 'em damn kikes, and accuse the damn kikes of controlling the media" - by your logic, *I* would be the one making the racial epithets, instead of using them to make a point. Stupid, stupid.
Well you've done it now; Cleon has to put you on ignore, too, if he's going to preserve his little conceit that I was making a racist comment.

(BTW, your South Park reference did not pass by unnoticed... :))
 
I know I pay a lot for health insurance, school taxes, etc. I wonder how much illegal immigrants pay for things such as this? And at the same time I wonder take advantage of getting free health care, public education, etc.
Don't you also wonder how much illegal immigrants get paid for the same labor as the legals? It sounds like you would prefer to be an illegal immigrant. Stop wondering and let's try that as an experiment. Turn in your citizenship if you have one and go around the country illegally. Also, turn in your CIGNA or other health insurance card and go and try to use the public facilities instead. Move into one of those nice comfortable illegal apartments with ten plus people in them. Stand in neighborhood corners hoping to be picked up. Then you would truely know how much difference there is between you and them.
 
Wow, are you stupid or disingenuous? He was obviously writing from the point of view of an hypothetical "they took our jerbs!!" racist. It seems you're just looking at an excuse to ignore his points.
He used it twice, and without quotes. He could have quite easily said, "no, sorry, you misunderstand, I meant this is what the jerks think." Instead, in response, he latched onto this bizarre "Cleon is a communist" canard that Jocko has been parroting. So the only logical conclusion is that he's a racist and doesn't mind advertising the fact.

As for his points, well, I've addressed his points. Repeatedly. He has chosen to ignore that, construct strawmen, and talks about opera and "wetbacks." Draw your own conclusions.

But good try.
 
Last edited:
So I'm missing class to work. To hell with the boycott. I can't afford to take a day off. (Must be nice to be some of these kids who are...) Also, I have no problems taking the opportunity to make a few more bucks to give to UCLA.

I sincerely feel that this is going on for the wrong reasons. As I've said a thousands times, this debate has been framed as Immigrants = Latino = Illegal, and that's not the case. It should not be about immigrants and, "those people," and, "losing our culture." It should be about illegal immigration and how to cut it down. I'm not really seeing that.
 
Interesting thing happened...

I work in Brentwood, which is an upscale neighborhood and it just so happens the building I work in is located near a number of restaurants. Well, the real upscale places where Hollywood types go for business lunch and such are closed, but the regular and chain places are open.

Which makes me think, just who the heck feels better about those places being closed, the employees or the customers?
 
He used it twice, and without quotes. He could have quite easily said, "no, sorry, you misunderstand,
Yeah, except that you always seem to misunderstand, and it gets tiresome. It's funny, other people seem to have understood quite well, without my having to draw them a picture. I guess I'm too subtle for some people.
 
Instead, in response, he latched onto this bizarre "Cleon is a communist" canard that Jocko has been parroting. So the only logical conclusion is that he's a racist and doesn't mind advertising the fact.

That is a lie. That was not my response. My response was that it's about illegals being organized by socialists. Not by you, not by communists. Check your facts and then apologize, please.

As for his points, well, I've addressed his points. He has chosen to ignore that. Instead, he talks about "wetbacks." Draw your own conclusions.

That is a lie. You have ducked the issue at every turn. This false assignation of racism is just the latest tack, and diminishes REAL racism through your flip usage.

Please stop lying about other posters.
 
Yeah, except that you always seem to misunderstand, and it gets tiresome. It's funny, other people seem to have understood quite well, without my having to draw them a picture. I guess I'm too subtle for some people.

Blah blah blah. Sorry, I was busy reading the Manifesto again. I'd translate it into Spanish, but unless I get the wording just right as deemed acceptable by BPSCG, it wouldn't work.

You could've explained it. Instead, you chose to go on a bizarre tangent. Not your first, either.

Suck it up, racist.
 
Suck it up, racist.
Judith Martin writes a delightfully wise, syndicated column for The Washington Post, called "Miss Manners," where people are invited to write (in blue or blue-black ink, on proper stationery) with their questions about etiquette.

Someone once wrote to her that at a party, she had been confronted by a guest who said something gratuitously and shockingly rude to her, in front of others. The lady said she was so stunned that she was tongue-tied, and couldn't think of a proper, but civil rejoinder, and she was now turning to Miss Manners for help. How should she have responded?

Miss Manners replied to the following effect: "With shocked silence. When a person says something shockingly and gratuitously rude, it is often best to let the statement stand there in all its ugliness, so that all may appreciate it and draw their conclusions about the speaker."
 
Judith Martin writes a delightfully wise, syndicated column for The Washington Post, called "Miss Manners," where people are invited to write (in blue or blue-black ink, on proper stationery) with their questions about etiquette.

Someone once wrote to her that at a party, she had been confronted by a guest who said something gratuitously and shockingly rude to her, in front of others. The lady said she was so stunned that she was tongue-tied, and couldn't think of a proper, but civil rejoinder, and she was now turning to Miss Manners for help. How should she have responded?

Miss Manners replied to the following effect: "With shocked silence. When a person says something shockingly and gratuitously rude, it is often best to let the statement stand there in all its ugliness, so that all may appreciate it and draw their conclusions about the speaker."

Judith Martin is among my heros! Thank you so much for referring to her as an authority. :)

Aaron
 
Was very dishonest concerning my position. WHY should I have to play by the rules if noone else does? I dont use the criminal term because it is a convenient slur

This feels very much to me like putting words in my mouth. I know you dont mean to do that. COuld you just honestly entertain for a second that I am calling the chips falling whewre I see them? Just consider it from my side for a second
"You only seem to be using that term because it's a convenient slur against your frustration."
You should read more closely. To me, it seems like your problem is not with the illegal aspect of their status, but the sheer number. That is not putting words in your mouth. Nothing you have complained about really has anything to do with the crime they've committed, and I formed an opinion based on that fact.
And as has been stated numerous times, education and health services are being stolen, and the million dollar a day fine for not being able to afford to teach criminal tresspassers in spanish is WAY more than any state could bear for long. Is that so hard to understand?
The law states that you must teach these students. Why is it okay that the school system is breaking the law? Aren't they "criminals" now under your code of ethics? Also, why do you assume all of the students who need this education are illegal?

And why are they "stealing" these services? These people pay taxes, too. See here and here. Just how much and whether it is a boost or burden is something we can debate, but I don't think it's fair to say they're stealing social services.
I dont have a million dollars a day to pay someone to break into my house, do you?
Now we're off in the land of nonsense analogy. Am I supposed to throw a fit that I feel like you're putting words in your mouth or remark about your hidden agenda? Or can we actually continue to have a rational discussion about the subject at hand? I prefer the latter.
 
"You only seem to be using that term because it's a convenient slur against your frustration."
You should read more closely. To me, it seems like your problem is not with the illegal aspect of their status, but the sheer number. That is not putting words in your mouth. Nothing you have complained about really has anything to do with the crime they've committed, and I formed an opinion based on that fact.
.

I just dont know where you get this from. My problem IS their illegal status, but yes numbers too. I would rather deal with three criminals than 12-20 million
 
I just dont know where you get this from. My problem IS their illegal status, but yes numbers too. I would rather deal with three criminals than 12-20 million
So if your problem is with law breakers, why are you not angry with the schools as well for not providing adequate funding for teaching English as a second language?
 
So I'm missing class to work. To hell with the boycott. I can't afford to take a day off. (Must be nice to be some of these kids who are...) Also, I have no problems taking the opportunity to make a few more bucks to give to UCLA.

I sincerely feel that this is going on for the wrong reasons. As I've said a thousands times, this debate has been framed as Immigrants = Latino = Illegal, and that's not the case. It should not be about immigrants and, "those people," and, "losing our culture." It should be about illegal immigration and how to cut it down. I'm not really seeing that.
You expect reasoned debate about relevant issues? You're in the wrong section of the forum for that. :D
 
Now hold on

When you take money meant for someone else you are a thief. There is no way around this. This happens without question in our education and health care system. Never mind the broader, philisophical definition of taking what is someone else's in that you havent paid for it.
And as has been pointed out, illegals do not take jobs that US citizens want. They pay about as much tax as a US citizen would pay on an equivalent income. They don't get much health care or other benefits, but considering how they support our economy, I would say they more than earn what they take. Yes, they get schooled, but again, in my opinion, having a literate society is worth the investment. There's more ways of "paying" than just money, pipeline. There's such a thing as "working off your debt." I would say that illegals do just that.

By definition they ARE criminals. Why is this law wrong to enforce when it is right to enforce the laws against stealing tires off of someone's car? Because it is simpler?
Yes, they are criminals. Almost every adult I know is some sort of criminal, since it is almost impossible to have been alive in the US without violating a law or two. But there are levels of criminal activity. Again I ask, do you come down hard on the petty criminals and ignore the big bosses? Would you arrest the car thieves, but ignore the crime syndicate that is buying the cars from them? Yes, it is much easier to arrest the little fish, but it does nothing to solve the problem, because there are plenty of little fish.

But anyway. I cant speak for the nation as a whole, I CAN say what I have seen with my own two eyes. MANY here have lost jobs because of the illegals. You can pretty much forget the "part time" or "summer" jobs for kids.
My experience is otherwise. Like BPSCG, I see all sorts of openings for unskilled labor. True, a lot of them are McJobs, but I don't see too many people actually unable to find work. But I reiterate, if companies are hiring illegals and firing nationals, then it is the companies you should be angry with, not the people taking jobs. They are the ones holding the cards.

More seriously, the people *I* work for no longer have jobs, or no longer have jobs with enough discretionary spending to afford my 15 dollars an hour. I am talking about framers, a perfectly noble profession that used to typically carry 12-25 dollars an hour. These jobs are gone, replaced with 5-8 dollar an hour illegal labor, or "coyote slaves", which is a whole nother can of worms.
Who is responsible for that management policy to hire "coyote slaves"? Why is it they are able to do your job for one half to one third the price? If the cost of doing business for a company suddenly doubled, would they be able to stay in business? How would they cover their increased costs?

This is not as simple a solution as you might think.

Painters, again, good money for a hard worker, gone

Food service, with no threat of prosecution, even the most expensive restaraunts have turned to illegals, so that age old stepping stone profession to the music industry is gone

Maybe you can see the effects by checking out our formerly thriving live music nightclubs. The VERY few we have left now are so underpopulated that bands must buy tickets from the clubs to sell so that there will be patronage at the bar as there is no longer a customer base for the club.
Punish the bosses, not the grunts, or at least make their punishments relative. If a boss hires ten illegal grunts, punish him ten times as much as each grunt. Make him pay for health, medical care or even for relocation to Mexico for each and every one of them. That's how you'll solve the problem. That and paying a lot more for everything. And don't let me hear you complaining about the cost of living when everything costs more because we're paying the workers $25 an hour instead of $8.

Maybe you can come to a public school here and see the effects.
My wife teaches in public school in Houston. She says that children of illegals are among the best behaved and most hard-working, because they don't want to make trouble for their parents and get them deported. Also,they are seeking a better life for themselves, yeah, they have a language problem, but I know a lot more bilingual Hispanics than "long-time" Americans. The biggest discipline problems are legal immigrants, though "long-time" Americans rival them.

People ARE losing jobs HERE. People are suffering HERE

maybe not where you are. Maybe you benefit where you are, we sure dont, and if you ARE benefiting, maybe you could send some of that windfall to the hospitals and school systems here.
Yes, there is suffering, though I cannot see that the US economy is sinking because of illegal immigration. In fact, our economy is quite robust. I compare the average comfort of the average US citizen today to what it was back in the 60's and it looks to me like we are doing quite well overall.

And consider the suffering of others as well. Do you not think illegal immigrants suffer too? Does the fact that they are taking advantage of a loophole in our law enforcement (which is dangerous for them to do, but not at all dangerous for those enticing them) in order to support their family make you callous to their suffering?

There are problems and we need to work on solutions, but demonizing illegal aliens is not going to do a bloody thing except feed your rage.
 
Last edited:
To contributors to this thread stop this puerile behaviour. I have already had to remove some posts to AAH so abide with you Membership Agreement or stop posting or face being banned from this section of the forum. ("But he/she started it " is not an excuse for you also breaching your Membership Agreement.)
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat
 
You expect reasoned debate about relevant issues? You're in the wrong section of the forum for that. :D

I'm smart enough to not expect that from here, but not smart enough to not keep expecting it from the rest of the country.
 

Back
Top Bottom