Illegal Immigrants Plan to Boycott May 1

Immigrants

Well, I am against anyone breaking the law, and it seems that illegal immigrants are doing just this.

I know I pay a lot for health insurance, school taxes, etc. I wonder how much illegal immigrants pay for things such as this? And at the same time I wonder take advantage of getting free health care, public education, etc.

I say go ahead and build the fence, put more guards on the border and then start deporting. This would help a lot in the long term. I would pay extra taxes to support this.
 
Your entire stance is now summed up. You're just another run-of-the-mill racist.
Read what Jocko said above. Says in a very few words what I probably would have taken a paragraph to express, which I know is longer than your usual attention span. Hope you can understand what he wrote, though given the quality of some of your posts the last few days, I wonder.
 
I say go ahead and build the fence, put more guards on the border and then start deporting. This would help a lot in the long term. I would pay extra taxes to support this.
And then - and only then - start a serious program to really give people who want to become Americans a fair chance to do so. This is a big, unbelieveably prosperous country. And yet, for the last two hundred years, there have been those who said we couldn't handle any more foreigners - especially "them." And those people have always been wrong. This country can assimilate millions more, and rather than costing us, assimilating millions of people who want to work hard and get rich would make it an even richer country.

So build a wall, throw out the illegals, and set up clear rules for how people who want to come here can become citizens in a reasonable amount of time.
 
Beats my pair of jacks. I'm guessing that most of the people who complain they can't get a job 'cuz the wetbacks are stealing them are people who are looking for an excuse not to work, and if the wetbacks were gone, there'd be some other excuse like the jobs are too far away or they don't pay enough to live on or I don't have the skills or my back hurts or the sun got in my eyes or global warming...
I agree. I also see that the anti-illegal movement seems to have a lot of just this sort of people in their ranks, some of which are members of my family. They claim to want to work, but they want weekends off, paid vacation, health benefits and stuff like that. One of my relatives turned down a job because "the building smells bad".

So my point is that illegals are not stealing jobs from us. There are jobs for anyone who seriously wants one. Are they stealing from our economy? They do get a lot of benefits from it, but they also put back a lot, doing jobs that, by your experience and mine, US citizens won't take, yet which need to be done. Some folks call them "thieves" (no, not you BP). I feel that such appellations prevent rational discussion about how to solve the problem.

Unemployment in this country is pretty low right now; I can't believe jobs are that hard to find. Yeah, maybe the perfect job you want isn't out there - I'd love to get paid a couple hundred thou a year to be a condom quality tester - but there are jobs (we desperately need dog walkers in Alexandria...:boggled: ). A year or so ago, Vincente Fox got in all kinds of hot water for saying that Mexicans in the U.S. do jobs that "even the blacks won't do," but then last year, Ray Nagin said almost exactly the same thing when he said one of his big problems was keeping the Mexicans from swarming into New Orleans and taking all the jobs. How come these day labor sites are always populated by Hispanics who speak little or no English? You'd think an unemployed American would get out there figuring, "Hey, I speak English - I'll be one of the first ones hired; I might even be able to dicker for extra pay just because I can speak English..." but they don't - then complain the wetbacks are taking "their" jobs.
And once again I ask, why are they able to take all the jobs? Because there is little or no risk to a company who hires illegals. It's a nudge-nudge-wink-wink sort of thing when it comes to punishing those who could be compared to slave traders. (Not an exact comparison of course, but similar in some ways.)

As you can see, I'm not - quite the opposite.
Yes I see you are not a "fire breather". ;)

My problem isn't with immigration - hell, my parents were immigrants, and I married someone from a foreign country (well, go ahead, tell me Texas isn't a foreign country...). My problem is with illegal immigrants. The more people who want to become Americans, with all that entails, the better, as far as I'm concerned. But I have little patience for the mentality that says, "I'm going to pick and choose how American I'm going to be. I want the benefits of being an American, but don't want to pay the fare."
I agree, the problem is that it is illegal. But isn't it just as illegal for the hirer as the hiree? And doesn't the hirer ultimately control whether or not illegals get hired? They are providing the jobs and the money that fuels this problem. It seems to me that our focus is 180 degrees in the wrong direction. But because the hirers have money and power, we leave them alone. In my mind that is just plain wrong.

However, consider the consequences of "fixing" the problem by making hirers provide benefits to all their employees. Costs would skyrocket, especially for housing and food. Every economist knows this, and the government knows this, which is why they don't do anything about it. You want to get rid of illegals? You'd better be ready to open your wallet, because they are not hurting the economy or the unemployment situation.

Yes they do. Just being able to get away with it doesn't mean they don't have to.
I disagree. Being able to get away with it does mean they don't have to. If the laws are unenforced, then people won't obey them.
 
Read what Jocko said above.

I have Jocko on ignore for precisely the kind of twaddle he's peddling above. "Illegal immigrants organized by socialist organizations" - he's pretty much confirming that he's completely ignorant of the situation. (Hint: ANSWER has tried to opportunistically latch onto the movement. ANSWER has been repudiated as a result.)

Nice attempt to deflect, though, racist.

Says in a very few words what I probably would have taken a paragraph to express, which I know is longer than your usual attention span. Hope you can understand what he wrote, though given the quality of some of your posts the last few days, I wonder.

You're the one using racial epithets, not me. What's next - going to rail against affirmative action, talking about "uppity n*****s?"
 
I have Jocko on ignore for precisely the kind of twaddle he's peddling above. "Illegal immigrants organized by socialist organizations" - he's pretty much confirming that he's completely ignorant of the situation. (Hint: ANSWER has tried to opportunistically latch onto the movement. ANSWER has been repudiated as a result.)

Nice attempt to deflect, though, racist.



You're the one using racial epithets, not me. What's next - going to rail against affirmative action, talking about "uppity n*****s?"

If you want to end "twaddle," I recommend you burn your computer, comrade. It's not like you're using it for anything constructive, anyhow.

Lousy commies. You deflect the issue so many times and in such pathetically transparent ways, any attempt to put things back on topic seems ITSELF to be a deflection. Fortunately, we're not all so mentally crippled, so by all means, keep dancing the red square two-step. It's most amusing.


Edited to add:

Hey, Cleon, I hope you're reading this because your "repudiated" socialists are still involved here in Chicago:

As hundreds of people streamed into Union Park, scores of street entrepreneurs were selling flags, T-shirts and snacks along Ashland Avenue. Members of the Socialist Party, meanwhile, passed out free pamphlets to anyone who looked their way.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...y-snapshots,1,2897729.story?coll=chi-news-hed

Yeah, viva la revolucion, comrade. Get your placard and show the world what you're made of.
 
Last edited:
Im not sure. I certainly am not opposed to immigration! The same number though? Can we handle that? ALl at once?
That really gets to the heart of the problem. All of your complaints about suffering have to do with the number of immigrants, not this "criminal" nonsense. You only seem to be using that term because it's a convenient slur against your frustration.
 
That really gets to the heart of the problem. All of your complaints about suffering have to do with the number of immigrants, not this "criminal" nonsense. You only seem to be using that term because it's a convenient slur against your frustration.

Have you considered that, because it's unregulated, illegality and quantity might, just MIGHT, be connected somehow?

I think we ought to up our immigration quotas substantially. But I also think we ought to keep tighter controls on who's coming in. These two ideas are likewise connected.
 
Meanwhile, on the racist front:
Mexican Unions Urge U.S. Goods Boycott
May 01 11:49 AM US/Eastern


By WILL WEISSERT
Associated Press Writer

MEXICO CITY
Hundreds of union members rallied Monday to support Mexican migrants working in the United States and call for a boycott of U.S. goods in what was dubbed "A Day Without Gringos."
 
So my point is that illegals are not stealing jobs from us. There are jobs for anyone who seriously wants one. Are they stealing from our economy? They do get a lot of benefits from it, but they also put back a lot, doing jobs that, by your experience and mine, US citizens won't take, yet which need to be done. Some folks call them "thieves" (no, not you BP). I feel that such appellations prevent rational discussion about how to solve the problem.
.

Now hold on

When you take money meant for someone else you are a thief. There is no way around this. This happens without question in our education and healthcare system. Never mind the broader, philisophical definition of taking what is someone else's in that you havent paid for it

By definition they ARE criminals. WHy is this law wrong to enforce when it is right to enforce the laws against stealing tires off of someone's car? Becuase it is simpler?

But anyway. I cant speak for the nation as a whole, I CAN say what I have seen with my own two eyes. MANY here have lost jobs because of the illegals. You can pretty much forget the "part time" or "summer" jobs for kids.

More seriously, the people *I* work for no longer have jobs, or no longer have jobs with enough discretionary spending to afford my 15 dollars an hour. I am talking about framers, a perfectly noble profession that used to typically carry 12-25 dollars an hour. These jobs are gone, replaced with 5-8 dollar an hour illegal labor, or "coyote slaves", which is a whole nother can of worms

Painters, again, good money for a hard worker, gone

Food service, with no threat of prosecution, even the most expensive restaraunts have turned to illegals, so that age old stepping stone profession to the music industry is gone

Maybe you can see the effects by checking out our formerly thriving live music nightclubs. The VERY few we have left now are so underpopulated that bands must buy tickets from the clubs to sell so that there will be patronage at the bar as there is no longer a customer base for the club.

Maybe you can come to a public school here and see the effects.

People ARE losing jobs HERE. People are suffering HERE

maybe not where you are. Maybe you benefit where you are, we sure dont, and if you ARE benefiting, maybe you could send some of that windfall to the hospitals and school systems here
 
That really gets to the heart of the problem. All of your complaints about suffering have to do with the number of immigrants, not this "criminal" nonsense. You only seem to be using that term because it's a convenient slur against your frustration.

Dont put words in my mouth

This is NOT criminal nonsense

these are CRIMINALS. What part of illegal do you not understand?

And NO you are completely wrong, its not the number, its that they work ILLEGALLY. Under the table, lowering wages, stealing services they do not pay for

Seriously you are being very illgocial about this issue, maybe you have another motive?
 
Immigrants

Well, laws are established for a reason. Just because you do not agree with them does not mean that you have the right to break them. I would not try sneaking into Mexico, Japan, China, etc. just because I might make more money there.

Entering the US illegally is a crime, therefore people who break this law are criminals.

I also really do not think that the illegal immigrants here are that interested in becoming citizens, because then they would have to pay taxes, health insurance, etc.

And the ones around here do not come cheap. So they can make big money without having to pay taxes, pay for services, etc.

I certainly see why they would want to come here, but since it is against the law they should not do so. Period. And that goes for anyone not here legally, and not just Mexicans.
 
Last edited:
I also really do not think that the illegal immigrants here are that interested in becoming citizens, because then they would have to pay taxes, health insurance, etc.
Let's leave aside for a moment that they overwhelmingly don't actually have health insurance and that they pay nearly as much tax as they would as if they were all on the books. Your analysis lends itself to a pretty easy solution, doesn't it? Offer them all citizenship and see who bites.
 
Dont put words in my mouth

This is NOT criminal nonsense
I did not put those words in your mouth. They are my own words.
these are CRIMINALS. What part of illegal do you not understand?
We covered this ground. We obviously disagree. Those who commit petty crimes are not criminals in my book. Anyone who has ever broken the law is a criminal in your book.
And NO you are completely wrong, its not the number, its that they work ILLEGALLY. Under the table, lowering wages, stealing services they do not pay for
What services are they stealing?
Seriously you are being very illgocial about this issue, maybe you have another motive?
Implying that someone who disagrees with you has a sinister alternative motive is paranoid. Please don't act like the Loosers. Let's have an honest discussion.
 
Implying that someone who disagrees with you has a sinister alternative motive is paranoid. Please don't act like the Loosers. Let's have an honest discussion.

Yes lets be honest

this from you

"That really gets to the heart of the problem. All of your complaints about suffering have to do with the number of immigrants, not this "criminal" nonsense. You only seem to be using that term because it's a convenient slur against your frustration.
"

Was very dishonest concerning my position. WHY should I have to play by the rules if noone else does? I dont use the criminal term because it is a convenient slur

This feels very much to me like putting words in my mouth. I know you dont mean to do that. COuld you just honestly entertain for a second that I am calling the chips falling whewre I see them? Just consider it from my side for a second

And as has been stated numerous times, education and health services are being stolen, and the million dollar a day fine for not being able to afford to teach criminal tresspassers in spanish is WAY more than any state could bear for long. Is that so hard to understand?

I dont have a million dollars a day to pay someone to break into my house, do you?
 
Let's leave aside for a moment that they overwhelmingly don't actually have health insurance and that they pay nearly as much tax as they would as if they were all on the books. Your analysis lends itself to a pretty easy solution, doesn't it? Offer them all citizenship and see who bites.

I would so much rather have the people waiting in lines, going through the process legally offered citizenship than those who think they are so much better than everyone else that the law doesnt apply to them
 
So would I. But they're here. Whatcha gonna do? Wanna round 'em all up and send 'em back? Talk about taking resources! What do you suppose it would cost to equip, train and deploy a force that can arrest millions and millions of people, store 'em till their hearings and then put 'em on a bus to the border? My taxes are already too high, thanks.
 
Good point manny

How bout this, enforce the laws on the books already that they cant use state services. For starters

Second, enforce the laws already on the books that those here illegaly cannot get food stamps or welfare

I just wish someone would tell me which laws are ok to break, because Id sure as hell like to drive without paying insurance or needing emissions every year
 
That doesn't sound too unreasonable on its face. But which state services? I'm all for getting these people, if they're to remain illegal, licensed up and insured. Cool. But what about emergency rooms? Are we to allow hepatitis or tuberculosis epidemics in our poor communities because we've barred the illegals among them from the hospitals? Leaving aside any actual facts or moral implications, that doesn't sound very cost-effective.
 
So right now, my violin class had all the students, there's a number of tutors missing, and I'm cutting Chem lecture because I ran a few errands and found myself really, really, late, so I'm getting some other work done.

On the bright side, I may just end up coming in and picking up some slack...

...meaning I get paid more.
 

Back
Top Bottom