delphi_ote
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2005
- Messages
- 5,994
Losing our national soul? Quickly everyone! Say it with me!
UNDER GOD!
There. Now everything is okay.
Losing our national soul? Quickly everyone! Say it with me!
...First is the procurement and manufacture and dealing of fake documents
Driving with no liscence
No insurance
If you are willing to violate the law of sovereingty and tresspassing, whats a few more? The whole existence is criminal, your premise is completely false
Not to mention knowing that many times if caught in illegal activity, citizenship is not to be questioned.
Yeah. You realize that that tips the system (and prossibly illegally so) in favor of the police and away from the illegals, yes?Yeah, forgot about that one. In the cities of Mesa, Chandler, Glendale and Gilbert (phoenix is one BIG chunk with Mesa, Chandler, Gilbert, Phoenix, Tempe, Glendale, and a few other little ones as "the valley" but the cities are not separated, just different zones), officers are NOT allowed to inquire regarding citizenship status unless the person has already been PROCESSED for a crime, which usually means status undetermined till after the person is released
"I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen ... "
Sounds rather specific to me and rather drastic a change.
I never said that as well. And no ... you specifically said "nothing in there about assimilation ..." and in just one reply you are backing off that somewhat.
Intent ... in my opinion.
And that's your opinion.
Yeah, I'm sure you're going broke because of all the immigrants in the area.Then YOU pay for them
I cant afford it any longer, neither can my neighbors
You pay or you [edit] - really have no say in the matter
ID has firsthand knowledge of immigration. You may want to check around before you start calling people "liar" or "ignorant" because they don't agree with your rantings.Youre either a totaly liar or completely ignorant
This is not correct. The majority of "illegal" immigrants arrive legally and overstay their visa.The whole system of life becomes crime. First is the procurement and manufacture and dealing of fake documents
Again, not correct. You are not required to be a citizen to get a driver's license.Driving with no liscence
Again, not correct, for the same reasons as above. In Georgia, for example, you are required to have insurance before you can get your car registered or tag renewed. Before you say anything about "fake documents," the system is completely computerized; cops don't even ask for insurance cards anymore, they just look it up in the database. And yet there aren't a massive number of people driving around with expired tags.No insurance
Funny, I drive every day in a city and state that is crawling with immigrants, "legal" and not. Yet my last two accidents involved being rear-ended by good, upstanding, citizens.I as a person who drives MINIMALLY am on my third hit and slam from a illegal mobile.
It's so familiar, you can't provide evidence this happens on a regular basis, or that this is something unique to "illegals."Its the familiar "everyone jumps out of the truck and runs off, leaving the truck in the intersection" to anyone in this area
Yeah, these evil, evil people who want to work and earn a better life for themselves and their families. How dare they.If you are willing to violate the law of sovereingty and tresspassing, whats a few more? The whole existence is criminal, your premise is completely false
Yeah, I'm sure you're going broke because of all the immigrants in the area.![]()
Yeah, ok.YES, I am
Reference?Our school system is being fined ONE MILLION DOLLARS a day for not being able to come up with the money to teach illegals in spanish
Literally? And the illegal immigrants took it away? You have proof?Our health care system is gone, unless you can afford the Mayo CLinic
Projection.Come visit for a week Ill show your ignorant, holier than thou, azz whats going on
Reference?
Literally? And the illegal immigrants took it away? You have proof?
Projection.
http://www.nabe.org/press/Clips/clip010506b.htm
Notice it is not anyone but spanish speaking, there are no japanese, philipinos, samoans, vietnamese, noone else asking err insisting that they be handed to
Mr. Horne also disputed the court's decision to exempt English-language learners from the high school exit exam until the funding matter is resolved.
The exam is part of Arizona's Instrument to Measure Standards, or AIMS, the state testing system.
Until this ruling, these students were heavily motivated to become proficient in English. This ruling undercuts their motivation to acquire the skills they need to succeed in today's economy, Mr. Horne said.
But anyway, you guys be happy there in your little boxes while we suffer here and bear the brunt of it so you cguys can pat yourselves on the back
Around here, legally resident hispanics are also planning to strike on the 1st. Is there some reason for your misleading title?
So I guess the Mexicans didn't take your health care, as you've provided no evidence for that.http://www.nabe.org/press/Clips/clip010506b.htm
Notice it is not anyone but spanish speaking, there are no japanese, philipinos, samoans, vietnamese, noone else asking err insisting that they be handed to
But anyway, you guys be happy there in your little boxes while we suffer here and bear the brunt of it so you cguys can pat yourselves on the back
That doesn't sound like an unreasonable request, and it was handed down by a judge. I'm sorry you have a problem with the law.In a ruling last month, a federal court gave the state until Jan. 24, or just 15 days following the start of its 2006 legislative session, to find a way to adequately fund programs for such students, or be fined $500,000 per day for 30 days. The daily fine would increase to a maximum of $2 million if the state continued to miss the court's deadlines.
And nothing about singing a song in Spanish, or speaking the language for that matter, indicates allegiance to another country. Your fishing for something that simply isn't there.
Rejecting assimilation?
However, the same advance buzz that drew singers to scramble for inclusion in the recording sessions this week in New York, Miami, Texas, Mexico, Puerto Rico and the Dominican Republic has also spurred critics who say rendering the song in Spanish is a rejection of assimilation into the United States.
Even some movement supporters are puzzled by the use of Spanish.
"Even our Spanish media are saying, 'Why are we doing this, what are you trying to do?' " said Pedro Biaggi, the morning host with El Zol (99.1 FM), the most popular Hispanic radio station in the Washington area. "It's not for us to be going around singing the national anthem in Spanish. . . . We don't want to impose, we don't own the place. . . . We want to be accepted."
Because there isn't anything in there about assimilation. Assimilation is about giving up parts of your culture to adapt to a larger culture.
There's nothing in there that indicates you have to give up your culture, religion, language, hairstyle, or anything that indicates "assimilation" beyond a desire to become a citizen. Which isn't really assimilation.
Your opinion is not based on anything substantial, really, as shown above and below.
No, that's the facts of the matter. Unless you can provide evidence that there is a proposal on the table to substitute this for the Star-Spangled banner, or that this is anything but a way to express that Spanish-speaking people are already part of the US, that they wouldn't have it any other way, and there's nothing wrong with that whatsoever.
Some immigration supporters, however, think the song sends a mixed message.
"When you listen on the radio about the marches, they tell you not to wave the Mexican flag, but they'll play this anthem. They're contradicting themselves," said Rafael Barajas, former president of the Federation of Zacatecan Clubs of Southern California.
The 54-year-old Anaheim resident said the song will ultimately hurt the movement and may trigger a backlash.
"Wow. What are they doing now?" said Raymundo Chavez of Placentia when he heard about the song on the daytime program "Escandalo T.V." Chavez said the artists are not helping out their own people.
"There are some things you just shouldn't touch, like 'The Star-Spangled Banner,'" Chavez, 65, said. "It was written a certain way, and that's the way it should be sung,"
St. Patrick's DayBecause there isn't anything in there about assimilation. Assimilation is about giving up parts of your culture to adapt to a larger culture.
There's nothing in there that indicates you have to give up your culture, religion, language, hairstyle, or anything that indicates "assimilation" beyond a desire to become a citizen. Which isn't really assimilation.
Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!
It seems I'm far from alone in this opinion (MSNBC) ...
Your national allegiance is part of one's culture. The laws one followed growing up and obeying within their society are a large part. And as you can plainly see, your definition of assimilation is a bit limited -- I can point to many sites (even Hispanic) that consider just becoming a US citizen a process of assimilation.
That's (my opinion) been more than substantiated at this point.
Even Hispanics will argue against you on that one. Plus, can you point to where I said this was to be a rewrite of the National Anthem? I believe I pointed to it as being against the grain of assimilation. You're using a Strawman here.
Hombre de paja.
Edit: Aside from entering the country illegally, most illegal immigrants avoid breaking the law. They know that if they're arrested, and it's determined that they are in this country illegally, they will likely be deported.