If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

FalseFlag said:
This proves he lost a court case. Where is the proof that Silverstein lost billions?


So far, the evidence does not support your claim.
Click to expand...

On the contrary, it's right there in black and while that Larry Silverstein lost the court battle with the airlines and failed to gain the billions of dollars he requested.

Larry Silverstein Insurance dispute

The insurance policies for World Trade Center buildings 1 WTC, 2 WTC, 4 WTC and 5 WTC had a collective face amount of $3.55 billion. Following the September 11, 2001, attacks, Silverstein sought to collect double the face amount ($7.1 billion) on the basis that the two separate airplane strikes into two separate buildings constituted two occurrences within the meaning of the policies.

The total potential payout, therefore, was capped at $4.577 billion for buildings 1, 2, 4, and 5.
 
FalseFlag said:
Which link, and where in that link, does it say Silverstein lost billions? Losing a court case is not the same as losing billions.
Click to expand...

Larry Silverstein insured for too small an amount, he’d also failed to complete policy negotiations before the attacks occurred. As a result he’s been involved with legal fights with the insurers for years, and can only claim $4.6 billion instead of the $7 billion.
 
skyeagle409 said:
Larry Silverstein insured for too small an amount, he’d also failed to complete policy negotiations before the attacks occurred. As a result he’s been involved with legal fights with the insurers for years, and can only claim $4.6 billion instead of the $7 billion.
Click to expand...
Once again, your claims do not prove that he lost billions. Yes, he received a lower amount than what he wanted, but he did not actually lose money. He simply did not receive as much as he wanted.
 
FalseFlag said:
Once again, your claims do not prove that he lost billions. Yes, he received a lower amount than what he wanted, but he did not actually lose money. He simply did not receive as much as he wanted.
Click to expand...

No. Had he been properly insured he would have received over two BILLION dollars more. Since he did not, he received two BILLION dollars LESS.

Simple subtraction, not even physics, and you fail.
 
FalseFlag said:
One does not lose when one receives more than one had to begin with. Is that so hard to comprehend?


How does "comprehension of an issue" equal "fail"?
Click to expand...

Once again, Larry Silverstein not only lost the court battle, he lost the billions.
 
Last edited:
FalseFlag said:
Once again, your claims do not prove that he lost billions. Yes, he received a lower amount than what he wanted, but he did not actually lose money. He simply did not receive as much as he wanted.
Click to expand...
You have to understand that Larry Siliverstein lost billions and it is history already.

Larry Silverstein Loses Billions

A federal judge on Thursday rejected developer Larry Silverstein's bid to recover billions of dollars from two airlines whose planes were used in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, a significant setback in his nearly decadelong fight for more money to rebuild the World Trade Center.
 
Last edited:
FalseFlag said:
One does not lose when one receives more than one had to begin with. Is that so hard to comprehend?
Click to expand...

Show how he "received more then he had to begin with"?

Remember, he didn't own the Towers and none of that money went directly to him. He was responsible for replacing the asset.
 
DGM said:
Show how he "received more then he had to begin with"?

Remember, he didn't own the Towers and none of that money went directly to him. He was responsible for replacing the asset.
Click to expand...
Bump.

I'm sure FF wants to set the record straight here.............:rolleyes:
 
DGM said:
Bump.

I'm sure FF wants to set the record straight here.............:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Let's make this easy - easy enough for a skeptic to understand.

Suppose I have no cookies. I ask my mommy for two cookies. My mommy gives me one cookie. I asked for two, but I got one. Did I lose anything? No. I simply did not receive as much as I wanted.

Now, suppose I have two cookies. I drop one, and the dog eats it. Now I have one cookie. I had two cookies, but now I have one. I lost a cookie.

Do you see the difference? Of course you do; it's simple enough for any skeptic to understand.
Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 0 and rule 12.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom