Some of us didn't watch the videos in "Fantasy-vision". Try it some time.
Last edited:
If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II
- Thread starter Seymour Butz
- Start date
Axxman300
Philosopher
We just didn't watch them while stoned.
Redwood
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- May 9, 2012
- Messages
- 1,557
Here ya go, FF: The best and most complete video evidence of the "102 Minutes". The reality that Truthers need to confront. Tell us where you think you hear demolition charges, and in particular the ~1,000,000 exploding ceiling tiles in each building.
Later, you can explain WHY the "midair pulverization of 90,000 lbs of concrete" was necessary in the first place. Especially since the concrete was non-structural. Maybe just a way for the NWO to taunt the Truthers that the knew would appear?
Explain it for me.Here ya go, FF: The best and most complete video evidence of the "102 Minutes". The reality that Truthers need to confront. Tell us where you think you hear demolition charges, and in particular the ~1,000,000 exploding ceiling tiles in each building.
Later, you can explain WHY the "midair pulverization of 90,000 lbs of concrete" was necessary in the first place. Especially since the concrete was non-structural. Maybe just a way for the NWO to taunt the Truthers that the knew would appear?
Me neither. So, why can I see it for what it is, but you can't?
Crazy Chainsaw
Philosopher
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 8,339
Because we see the truth and you see only what you wish to see.
Axxman300
Philosopher
You two largely identical buildings burning after being struck by identical aircraft.
You see the South Tower start to lean before it collapses. It collapses first because it was struck lower than WTC1.
You see the upper floors of the North Tower buckle before it collapses. The collapse tears the building apart floor by floor with no consistent sequence.
You see windows of WTC7 blown out from the force of the impact of debris from WTC1.
ProBonoShill
Master Poster
- Joined
- May 17, 2010
- Messages
- 2,329
You apparently haven't watched any WTC videos because I asked you to produce one with the loud bangs associated with a CD and so far....................... nothing.
Let me know when you find that video, it'll probably be around the same time you get your new investigation, like never.
NoahFence
Banned
What is the point of you being here, aside from trolling?
Seriously? Your ideas are so far out in left field, they will never amount to anything, you don't listen to documented facts from experts in their fields, and you won't accept common sense. You answer no questions that could lead you to learning anything. Your entire existence on this subforum is totally without reason.
What's the point?
Really? So you can provide the quote, where he says that?
If Barry experienced an explosive going off, he would be dead, and we would not be talking about what he said. With your zero knowledge of physics proved, now you display zero knowledge of explosives. A perfect record of failure, at least no you are posting fake evidence for the delusional claims you fail to explain in detail.
14 years of failure to figure out 9/11; better luck with Bigfoot.
Yes, I can, and so can you. Google is your friend.
I was bored and I watched parts of the video. I guess you think concrete pulverizes itself in midair. It can't, but I know I'm not going to change your mind.Here ya go, FF: The best and most complete video evidence of the "102 Minutes". The reality that Truthers need to confront. Tell us where you think you hear demolition charges, and in particular the ~1,000,000 exploding ceiling tiles in each building.
Later, you can explain WHY the "midair pulverization of 90,000 lbs of concrete" was necessary in the first place. Especially since the concrete was non-structural. Maybe just a way for the NWO to taunt the Truthers that the knew would appear?
It's also interesting to see the explosion about two floors below the fire line in WTC7 a few minutes before it collapses. I guess you don't see that.
I guess you also don't see the numerous smoking projectiles that come out of both towers at an almost regular basis. Every single one of them spins and leaves a curly smoke trail as it falls. I guess you have an explanation for those things, or you just ignore them.
You see what you want to. I get that.
Axxman300
Philosopher
You mean the burning segments of curtains, stapled financial reports, and other light burning objects that are blown out of the windows?
Are you really this dumb?
Ape of Good Hope
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2011
- Messages
- 1,502
“… pulverizes itself …”??
You’re absolutely daft.
50,000 tons of debris, crashing down on a 4” thick wafer of WWF reinforced concrete, which is rated for 300 lbs/square foot, will do a fine pulverizing job.
Meanwhile, you have not the slightest bit of information about how much of that debris cloud is concrete, versus other types of debris.
Unless you’re planning to invoke “structural” ceiling tiles, cubicle dividers & office paper.
Well, since WTC7 doesn’t collapse in this video, “it” must refer to either WTC1 or 2. In this video, WTC2 collapses at 57:05, and WTC1 collapses at 1:26:30.
“a few minutes before” these events would be around 53 / 54 minutes, or 1:23 / 1:24. And no, I don’t see anything, or hear anything, that would constitute an “explosion”.
Since we can clearly hear both collapses, we would certainly be able to hear demolition explosions in the nearer WTC7. Yet these “explosions” are missing from the audio.
Why don’t you post the exact time of your “explosions” & provide us with a description of its exact location, or a screen grab showing it.
I can’t wait.
Are you daft, or stupid?
Debris was hurled hundreds of feet from the tower. Some of it was in flames, as proven by the hundreds of cars that were set on fire. Some of the debris was covered in the very same debris that made up the cloud. What on earth is the slightest bit surprising about that debris “trailing smoke”?
Are you clueless about the careful design & control surfaces required to make a heavy object fly thru the air and NOT “spin”? Do you believe that random chunks dismembered building structure & contents will all magically emerge with wings, ailerons, elevator, tail, rudder & the proper weight & balance to not spin??
You can not possibly be this stoooopid?
You must be trolling.
Crazy Chainsaw
Philosopher
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 8,339
As was pointed out to Dylan Avery, himself in 2005, the swirling, pieces of drywall blown off the core tend to do that! DA.
abaddon
Penultimate Amazing
Plainly, Google is not your friend.
Crazy Chainsaw
Philosopher
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 8,339
Question, if drywall from the core wasn't pulverized, and was instead thrown clear of the collapses,
as viewed in the videos, what dies that do to your theory of pulverized concrete?
as viewed in the videos, what dies that do to your theory of pulverized concrete?
Redwood
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- May 9, 2012
- Messages
- 1,557
Cut the kid some slack, TFK. As he said, he only watched part of it, since he gets bored. Short attention span, you know. Like a goldfish. He probably forgot that only the Twin Towers are featured and was dimly remembering something else.
I predict we'll get no response, since he would actually have to focus his attention for a few minutes, which is beyond him.