If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

FalseFlag said:
LOL. Crazy Chainsaw just asked a question.
Click to expand...

And Cole Screwed up on his answers, the strongest connections were 100.000.000 PSI welds.

Forces exert energy, so without accurate energy value Cole's experiments are worthless.

The motion of the collapses can be summed up by a simple energy Equation of the forces involved since Cole does not even attempt to copy the energy values involved he has all but admitted his experiments are a fraud.
 
Last edited:
From this point onwards, no one gets to claim that Cole didn't defend his experiment. He did. He opened himself up to questions from anyone. If you missed your opportunity to ask a question, that is on you, not him.
 
FalseFlag said:
From this point onwards, no one gets to claim that Cole didn't defend his experiment. He did. He opened himself up to questions from anyone. If you missed your opportunity to ask a question, that is on you, not him.
Click to expand...

And he Admitted his experiments are irrelevant, totally irrelevant.
 
I think this is a good time to post my challenge from the very first post in the very first thread on this subject.

Instead of attacking me, or Mr. Cole, I challenge anyone in this forum to conduct an experiment proving just ONE of Mr. Cole's claims are wrong. You pick the claim, and you make your own video showing how he is wrong. Words and computer models don't count. Prove, by an experiment conducted by yourself and documented in your own video, just one of Mr. Cole's claims are wrong.
Click to expand...

There have been over 4000 posts since this first one and I am still waiting.

:D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom