I didn't mean to start a thread, then abandon it, but work carried me far and wide today, so all of that windshield time pretty much killed my chances of posting....until now.
So uh, can you sit on those benches or does no one dare? Those are somewhat.. strange. Odd choice if you ask me.
Yes, you can, and they are well used. Almost immediately after I took the picture, people started sitting down for a presentation by one of the ambassadors at the memorial. I kind of liked the arrangement. There are two rows with an aisle in the middle, and they face toward the crash site. It is a little reminiscent of an outdoor chapel, especially with the big cross in the right front corner of the arrangement.
Nothing really to add. Thanks for sharing. It's interesting to get a feel for the space, and the solemnity, and symbolism used.
You're quite welcome, CL. I have seen so many pictures that I thought I knew the place well, but seeing it first hand is a whole different experience. I hoped the pictures I took would give a better feel of the surroundings than the carefully framed and staged ones that are usually seen in books or internet sites.
So OldTigerCub posts the OP which, to me, evokes the solomnity of the place. Too bad it was posted in the 9/11 Conspiracies Thread because the OP has nothing to do with such CTs. But by post #2 we were off to the CT races, never to come back to the real meaning of OTC's post, namely, that people died here in an attempt to save other American people and institutions.
It is a place where unimaginable courage ended. It is a truly a place of reflection and mourning.
That the usual characters (on both sides, damnit) play out their usual games demeans the thrust of the OP.
The pictures sadden me. The ensuing thread after the OP saddens me more.
You may have a good point, SezMe. I had originally thought about posting in the community or social issues/current events subforums. The amount of time that I have spent trying to counter CT claims made me feel that a personal visit to the Flight 93 site might reinforce my understanding of the events. It is hard to walk among the tributes and pictures and monuments, and look out across that field and have any doubt whatsoever that the passengers and crew of UAL 93 were true heroes, and that the first battle was won in the sky above Shanksville. I Decided to post it here mostly as an effort to bring a little piece of reality to a subforum so often riddled with absurd fantasies.
The crescent
issue is legitimate; a lot of people are angry about that, and to be honest, I'm one of them. In the original design it was specifically referred to as "the Crescent of Embrace", which not only sounds grammatically incorrect, but renders any talk about how it's just a coincidence involving semicircles irrelevant.
I tend to have a similar opinion with you on those points, Pat. I was not too crazy about the design myself when it was first announced. My personal opinion: Anything design that could in any way shape or form be construed or interpreted as having any favorable symbolism to the enemy that attacked us that day should have been summarily dismissed. I would have favored something simpler, and more reminiscent of a battlefield monument....but that's just my opinion.
On a side note, I understand that the committee met in Summersville this weekend, and Tom Burnett was on the radio on KDKA this morning. He mentioned being at the memorial site, and it made me wonder if he may have been among those that disembarked from the tour busses as I was preparing to leave. I thought it was a senior citizen's tour, but now that I think about it, nearly everyone was wearing plastic name badges. I guess it's just one of those things that will keep me wondering for a while....
Thanks for this post and the pics. As it is highly unlikely I will get to that part of the country any time soon, your thoughts give me a better feeling and perspective of the site.
You are quite welcome, Hokulele. It's a long swim from the islands,

but I hope you get to see it for yourself someday soon!
You don't say whether this is a permanent feature of the site or just a part of the temporary arrangements. I hope and guess it's the former, that seems so exactly right.
My understanding is that the large fence running around the entire perimeter of the crash site is temporary. I believe that the permanent memorial will be in that field, and will surround the hallowed ground area, but I also understand that the central impact area will still be off-limits to all but family members.