I found the missing Jolt.

[FalseFlag]

Painfully easy. They did test for them.
With their eyes. Didn't find any.

What scientific tests did they perform?

 

[FalseFlag]

NIST also says building 7 collapsed due to fire.

Do you believe one claim but not the other? Are you an expert in both areas, to be able to make such a judgment?

I don't have to be an expert to make this judgement. Anyone can easily deduce that if NIST didn't test for explosives, their claims regarding building collapses are questionable.



Nice try, but remember Yoda's words of wisdom. Do, or do not. There is no try.

 

[FalseFlag]

You are 100 percent fact free and no physics.

No, I'm not fact-free, but I do have a reduced fat option.

 

[FalseFlag]

He did say he was not an expert and was not a figure of authority on a number of subjects. That is actually a fact.

Congratulations. You have almost 23,000 posts, and that might have been the first fact you posted. Can you post two before you hit 50,000 posts?

 

[FalseFlag]

They determined, through investigation, that there was no cause to test for explosives. You skipped that part.

This logic has serious errors. You are putting the cart before the horse. You test for explosives at the beginning of the investigation in order to rule out possible causes.

 

[FalseFlag]

"Admitted"???
No, NIST stated that they did look for a reason to consider explosives, found none, therefore did not pursue that line of investigation.

UFOs ,,, pixie dust...

UFOs ,,, pixie dust...fraud...incompetence

You stopped too soon.

 

[FalseFlag]

Competent "If this, Then that" analysis is one of those methods.

You're right.

Competent "if this, then that" analysis would be to test for explosives at the beginning of the investigation.

That is not what happened.

 

[TJM]

Nice try, but remember Yoda's words of wisdom. Do, or do not. There is no try.

 

[FalseFlag]

This will be my last post to you that attempts to explain anything. *snip snip snip*

I will get back to you. There are far too many LOL's to be had to miss this.

 

[FalseFlag]

[qimg]http://i1233.photobucket.com/albums/ff387/AJM8125/Troda.jpg[/qimg]

Very nice, but I already changed my avatar once today.

 

[FalseFlag]

NO engineer, who ever commits fraud one single time in his career, will ever be considered “expert” ever again.

That's why it's so hard to get a new investigation. If we ever get one, and we can prove that fraud was committed, lots of "credible" engineers will never work again.

even ignoring the ethical aspects that so elude you.

Money > ethics for most people.

You should take some time to reflect on that.

Yes, you should.

 

[FalseFlag]

Now, just like FalseFlag, you abandoned that & merely make baseless assertions.

Translation: A "baseless assertion" is a logical refutation of the skeptics' BS.

Are structural engineers part of your "everybody"?

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Ha!

You don't get to criticize anybody else on their use of all-inclusive terms until you demonstrate that you understand their meaning. Clearly, based on your own posts, you struggle to grasp the meaning of all-inclusive terms.

Practice first, then preach.

 

[FalseFlag]

No further investigation of WTC 7 is warranted, and here's why.


WTC 7 Investiation

http://www.thorntontomasetti.com/projects/world_trade_center_7_collapse_investigation/

http://s3.amazonaws.com/tt_assets/pdf/WTC_7_Collapse_Analysis_and_Assessment_Report.pdf

I will consider your arguments once you learn what a credible source is.

 

[jaydeehess]

UFOs ,,, pixie dust...fraud...incompetence

You stopped too soon.

Ok, NIST Found no reason to pursue an investigation of UFOs, pixie dust, fraud, incompetance or explosives.

 

[FalseFlag]

In addition, I was sent to Pensacola, Florida by the U.S. Air Force and Raytheon Aerospace to develop a new structural repair manual for the TF-39C engine inlet for the Air Force and I was supervisor/inspector for the U.S. Air Force and for L3 Communications, structural component section at Travis AFB, CA.

I have also invented special aircraft structural tools for the USAF and for helicopters of the U.S. Army at Corpus Christi Army Depot, which is located on Corpus Christ Naval Air Station, Texas.

Thank you for explaining how "they" got to you.

 

[FalseFlag]

Ok, NIST Found no reason to pursue an investigation of UFOs, pixie dust, fraud, incompetance or explosives.

Why would they find a reason to investigate the fraud they were committing?

 

[FalseFlag]

Did you know the airframe of an SR-71 expands inches as its airframe is heated in flight? To put it in perspective, you can apply the expansion of the airframe of an SR-71 with the effects of fire on structural steel of the WTC buildings.

LOL.

Seriously?

What happens to the airframe of the SR-71 once it cools?

 

[jaydeehess]

Why would they find a reason to investigate the fraud they were committing?

You brought it up in reply to my post explaining that there was no reason to investigate explosives. I just agreed with you.

So basically you are jaq of yourself.

 

[FalseFlag]

Remember, fire will expand and weaken an exposed steel structure to the point of failure.

How hot does the fire have to be? How long does it have to burn? What happens if the fire moves from one part of the office to the other? Can a fire burn continuously without fuel? How long does a "normal office fire" burn in one given area? Wouldn't that depend on how much fuel was available? Once all the fuel is burned, how can a fire keep burning?

Oh, wait, I'm not an expert, so I don't know how to ask the obvious questions.

/sarcasm

 

[FalseFlag]

You mean bold-face lying like when someone displays building 7 "came down in a classic controlled demolition" on an electronic billboard?

Who has claimed "classic CD"? Making that claim would be foolish. We suspect it was CD, and it was unlike anything we have seen before, or after 9/11.