I am the first in the world

[Jack by the hedge]

... I haven't read the OP
... Some people are perpetually stuck in failure mode

You're quite sure you hadn't read the OP?

 

[dasmiller]

It would be more appropriate to say "it is indirectly observable."

FYI, we did a few laps on that topic earlier today in another thread (Electric Sun Theory) without much progress.

 

[A Laughing Baby]

How was gravitational lensing, etc. spun away?

 

[Buckaroo]

I'll thank you not to refer to other posters as cranks, it's disrespectful and insulting and doesn't further the discussion. If you have nothing to add to the discussion, remain silent.

You're right. Upon reflection, I have edited my post.

But you're still completely and utterly wrong about black holes.

 

[dasmiller]

How was gravitational lensing, etc. spun away?

You know, I don't think I can explain my understanding of their position without sounding really snarky.

Suffice to say that my belief in the physical plausibility black holes was not shaken.

 

[nathan]

Black hole is nonsensical fiction,

it is not based on any known principle of physics,

Incorrect. General relativity predicts them

the idea violates several known, established principles of physics and

Which?

is said

By whom?

to be utterly unobservable.

Incorrect.

 

[alfa1]

“When the core of the black hole attains the Planck density the core will ‘evaporate’ trough a burst of gamma rays, named quasar”
Adrian Ferent

Because the black hole does not have a perfect symmetry the gamma ray burst is not uniformly distributed.
Not good news for time traveler: inside the black holes you are squeezed and fried.
The question is: when a burst of gamma rays will come from the black hole that is in the center of our galaxy?

 

[Jack by the hedge]

“When the core of the black hole attains the Planck density the core will ‘evaporate’ trough a burst of gamma rays, named quasar”

Why then? Why not before? How do the gamma rays escape?

 

[aggle-rithm]

I'll make a competing claim to that:

Black hole is nonsensical fiction, it is not based on any known principle of physics,

Gravity...?

What do YOU think happens when the gravitational pull of an object results in an escape velocity greater than the speed of light? How much light would it put out?

the idea violates several known, established principles of physics and is said to be utterly unobservable.

Except for those observable effects that were predicted, then observed.

All these "properties" of "black hole" suggest it is entirely fictional.

Please, enlighten us with a theory that fits the evidence better. What do YOU say is at the center of our galaxy? Show us your calculations that prove it cannot be a supermassive black hole.

 

[aggle-rithm]

“When the core of the black hole attains the Planck density the core will ‘evaporate’ trough a burst of gamma rays, named quasar”
Adrian Ferent

Core of the black hole...?

You mean like the creamy center deep inside the singularity?

Because the black hole does not have a perfect symmetry the gamma ray burst is not uniformly distributed.
Not good news for time traveler: inside the black holes you are squeezed and fried.
The question is: when a burst of gamma rays will come from the black hole that is in the center of our galaxy?

In a very, very, very, very long time.

Take the total number of atoms in the universe and square that number. It's more years than that, probably.

 

[nathan]

“When the core of the black hole attains the Planck density the core will ‘evaporate’ trough a burst of gamma rays, named quasar”

What is the density of a black hole?

 

[alfa1]

What is the minimum mass of a black hole to attain the Planck density?

 

[nathan]

What is the minimum mass of a black hole to attain the Planck density?

don't you know?

 

[alfa1]

The minimum mass of a black hole to attain the Planck density:

I calculated: 10^43 kg

 

[Little 10 Toes]

Please show your work.

 

[Craig4]

Does anyone know what this thread is about anymore?

 

[Jack by the hedge]

It's about making unevidenced declarations.

 

[AdMan]

Does anyone know what this thread is about anymore?

Haven't you heard? It's always been all about alfa1's delusions.

It's getting pretty boring, though, so he better come up with something more amusing to make fun of.

 

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Does anyone know what this thread is about anymore?

It's an homage to George R. Simpson.

 

[nathan]

It's an homage to George R. Simpson.

So, what logo to you suggest?