I am the first in the world

[aggle-rithm]

You are a Wireless Access Vehicular Environment?

No, he's a "Woman Accepted for Volunteer Emergency Service".

 

[alfa1]

"The light can escape from a black hole because the density of the 'singularity' is smaller than the Planck density" Adrian Ferent

The physicists say the light can not escape from a black hole; this is wrong in my view because the highest density in the black hole is smaller(or equal) than the Planck density.
The 'singularity' with ZERO volume does not exists...

 

[TjW]

Nevermind.

 

[dasmiller]

"The light can escape from a black hole because the density of the 'singularity' is smaller than the Planck density" Adrian Ferent

The physicists say the light can not escape from a black hole; this is wrong in my view because the highest density in the black hole is smaller(or equal) than the Planck density.
The 'singularity' with ZERO volume does not exists...

Are you familiar with the concept of an "event horizon?"

 

[Jack by the hedge]

"The light can escape from a black hole because the density of the 'singularity' is smaller than the Planck density" Adrian Ferent

The physicists say the light can not escape from a black hole; this is wrong in my view because the highest density in the black hole is smaller(or equal) than the Planck density.
The 'singularity' with ZERO volume does not exists...

Why do you believe Planck density is critical?

 

[alfa1]

How the Universe, black hole can have a density higher than the Planck density?
How was crossed the Planck wall?
Who calculated?

 

[Craig4]

How the Universe, black hole can have a density higher than the Planck density?
How was crossed the Planck wall?
Who calculated?

So are we off the 98% animals thing now?

 

[dasmiller]

So are we off the 98% animals thing now?

Oh, I have the sinking feeling that 98% animals thing will be intimately connected to the Planck density thing.

 

[X]

I'm still waiting to find out where 20 came from.

 

[A Laughing Baby]

Why are we still continuing? He's shown that all he's going to do is just skip to some other ridiculous topic by quoting himself and then saying something pointless with an exclamation mark at the end of it.

Here, I'll save us all some time. If you think of a question, just read this, and consider it an analog for the answer you'll get:

"If you are not a person, you are an animal" Adrian Ferrent
IF you eat meat, then you are an animal, as eating meat is a defining characteristic of animals!

 

[Meed]

Bernadette was 98% animal.

And the movie was 100% schlock.

Shocker: I am 48% bicycle.

 

[alfa1]

How a black hole starts a quasar - can be a proof of my theory
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Russian_Doll_Galaxy_Reveals_Black_Holes_True_Power_999.html

 

[Arthur Mann]

How a black hole starts a quasar - can be a proof of my theory
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Russian_Doll_Galaxy_Reveals_Black_Holes_True_Power_999.html

There are a couple of problems with this. First, black holes are imaginary. Second, quasars are sorely misunderstood by most.

 

[Vorticity]

Shocker: I am 48% bicycle.

I am 100% bisexual... 50% of the time.

You do the math.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

How the Universe, black hole can have a density higher than the Planck density?
How was crossed the Planck wall?
Who calculated?

Who claimed any such thing? You are the one who made a specific claim: that a black hole could not trap light, as "the density of the 'singularity' is smaller than the Planck density".

The Planck unit of density is in the order of 5 x 10⁹⁶ kg m^-3. Why do you claim a singularity would need to be this dense?

Let me put it another way. How small would the earth have to be to fit inside its own Schwarzschild radius? What would its approximate density be if it did?

 

[Buckaroo]

There are a couple of problems with this. First, black holes are imaginary. Second, quasars are sorely misunderstood by most.

 

[Arthur Mann]

Oooh, boy. It's crank vs. crank. This oughta be good.

I'll thank you not to refer to other posters as cranks, it's disrespectful and insulting and doesn't further the discussion. If you have nothing to add to the discussion, remain silent.

 

[Arthur Mann]

You are the one who made a specific claim: that a black hole could not trap light, as "the density of the 'singularity' is smaller than the Planck density".

I'll make a competing claim to that:

Black hole is nonsensical fiction, it is not based on any known principle of physics, the idea violates several known, established principles of physics and is said to be utterly unobservable. All these "properties" of "black hole" suggest it is entirely fictional.

I'm not sure if this is on topic, I haven't read the OP. Maybe I'll go and do that now. I always go about things backwards like this, that way I can see the successes people have had before I learn the specifics of their failures. At least that applies to people who ultimately achieve success. Some people are perpetually stuck in failure mode, doing the same things over and over again in the same ways and expecting different results.

 

[Tubbythin]

Black hole is nonsensical fiction, it is not based on any known principle of physics, the idea violates several known, established principles of physics and is said to be utterly unobservable. All these "properties" of "black hole" suggest it is entirely fictional.

It is based on general relativity. Our theory of gravity that explains an extraordinary amount of data to an extraordinary precision.
And no, it is not utterly unobservable.

 

[A Laughing Baby]

It would be more appropriate to say "it is indirectly observable."