Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
I wonder if you could perhaps show us some sort of concrete example of your wisdom. Your silly little ideas won't suffice for this I'm afraid. Show us some clear examples of your wisdom.
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
I am the first in the world
- Thread starter alfa1
- Start date
-
- Tags
- consciousness
I wonder if you could perhaps show us some sort of concrete example of your wisdom. Your silly little ideas won't suffice for this I'm afraid. Show us some clear examples of your wisdom.
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
I think that was about as clear of an example of his wisdom as we’re ever going to Craig4. Unfortunately that well just don’t run all that deep.
kungfuhobbit
Student
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2012
- Messages
- 32
AdMan
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2010
- Messages
- 10,293
Off-topic idiocy.
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
So, if these people you complain about are "at animal level", why do they seem to be doing so much better than you? If you're so superior shouldn't there be some outward indication of this superiority?
Richard Dawkins.is an atheist. He can say the Christians, the Muslims..are ignorant, stupid, dummies…but God is there.
If Richard Dawkins’ theory is right, my Evolution theory is wrong.
My Evolution theory is right because I am superior in Evolution to Richard Dawkins.
http://stream.aljazeera.com/story/new-atheisms-most-polarising-figure-0022267
My Evolution theory on my website: http://ferentadrian.tk/
If Richard Dawkins’ theory is right, my Evolution theory is wrong.
My Evolution theory is right because I am superior in Evolution to Richard Dawkins.
http://stream.aljazeera.com/story/new-atheisms-most-polarising-figure-0022267
My Evolution theory on my website: http://ferentadrian.tk/
dafydd
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 35,398
Your evolution ''theory'' is wrong because I am superior to you.
Kid Eager
Philosopher
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 7,296
and if stencils were artichokes, there'd be voles in your fountain pen.
dafydd
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 35,398
There was an old man of St Bees
Who was stung in the arm by a wasp
When they said: "Does it hurt?"
He replied: "No, it doesn't—
I'm so glad it wasn't a hornet!"
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
Wait, wait, let me guess, it’s your “Evolution theory” that says you’re “superior in Evolution to Richard Dawkins” right? If that is the case you should perhaps read up on circular reasoning (as well as evolution).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning
This makes such assertions of your purported “Evolution theory” all kinds of wrong even if Richard Dawkins ain’t right.
devnull
Philosopher
I love how Alfa1 understands so little about evolution that he thinks it's Dawkin's theory.
May I postulate they wouldn't know God if he hit them in the face with a wet fish and may I request they stop playing around wasting millions of dollars on their silly little games before they do something serious like create a black hole and all disappear into it? Or maybe that wouldn't be such a bad thing...
http://english.pravda.ru/science/tech/04-07-2012/121566-scientists_god-0/
http://english.pravda.ru/science/tech/04-07-2012/121566-scientists_god-0/
devnull
Philosopher
You can postulate anything you feel like.
Of course, having absolutely no evidence in your favour does tend to strain your credibility, but I imagine that doesn't worry you too much?
Nay_Sayer
I say nay!
Do you have some qualm with people demanding evidence for ridiculous claims?
god showing him/her/it/horse self in tangible way would actually be a nice start for me to even consider the validity of his/her/it/horse's existence.
Consciousness and Evolution
“Our evolution level is our consciousness level” Adrian Ferent
The equation for Consciousness: C = c(e^(2x / 5000) – 1)
An abstract of my theory 'Consciousness and Evolution' on my website: http://ferentadrian.tk
“Our evolution level is our consciousness level” Adrian Ferent
The equation for Consciousness: C = c(e^(2x / 5000) – 1)
An abstract of my theory 'Consciousness and Evolution' on my website: http://ferentadrian.tk
Loss Leader
I would save the receptionist., Moderator
So the made-up thing that can't be quantified is a function of the other made-up thing that can't be quantified. Got it.
Wowbagger
The Infinitely Prolonged
If I was interested in studying the comparative features of consciousness across multiple species; perhaps humans, other primates, dogs, and snails, just to name a few examples; would this "theory" of yours help me do that?
If so, what predictions does it make for experiments one might try to conduct to test for consciousness features in these animals?
If not, can you name some types of studies for which it would be useful?
If so, what predictions does it make for experiments one might try to conduct to test for consciousness features in these animals?
If not, can you name some types of studies for which it would be useful?
Loss Leader
I would save the receptionist., Moderator
My equation for consciousness is
The way it works is that an animal's level of consciousness is directly equal to that animal's capacity for understanding that Natalie Portman just isn't into him.
So, for example, I am 13 years older than Natalie, she has a baby and she is getting married in August. I know for a fact that Natalie Portman just isn't into me*.
But let's take a dog. A friendly dog is going to run up and lick Natalie Portman, something I would almost never do. The dog doesn't understand that she's not into him. If Natalie kicked the dog, he might be deterred for the moment. The dog would eventually come back and try to lick her again. Natalie would have to kick the dog over and over for the dog to ever learn that she's just not into him. (I realize Natalie Portman loves and does not in any way kick dogs.) The dog has a lower level of consciousness than I do.
Now imagine a turtle. It really doesn't matter how Natalie treats a turtle. That turtle is never going to pick up on the fact that she doesn't want to date him, no matter how many times she calls the police. The turtle has a very low level of consciousness.
Thus, by putting any animal in a room with Natalie Portman, we can predict its evolutionary level to three standard deviations (or whatever deviation you'd like to use).
______________
* for now. Who knows what the future holds?
The way it works is that an animal's level of consciousness is directly equal to that animal's capacity for understanding that Natalie Portman just isn't into him.
So, for example, I am 13 years older than Natalie, she has a baby and she is getting married in August. I know for a fact that Natalie Portman just isn't into me*.
But let's take a dog. A friendly dog is going to run up and lick Natalie Portman, something I would almost never do. The dog doesn't understand that she's not into him. If Natalie kicked the dog, he might be deterred for the moment. The dog would eventually come back and try to lick her again. Natalie would have to kick the dog over and over for the dog to ever learn that she's just not into him. (I realize Natalie Portman loves and does not in any way kick dogs.) The dog has a lower level of consciousness than I do.
Now imagine a turtle. It really doesn't matter how Natalie treats a turtle. That turtle is never going to pick up on the fact that she doesn't want to date him, no matter how many times she calls the police. The turtle has a very low level of consciousness.
Thus, by putting any animal in a room with Natalie Portman, we can predict its evolutionary level to three standard deviations (or whatever deviation you'd like to use).
______________
* for now. Who knows what the future holds?
Last edited: