Hyper Dimensional Design

[Complexity]

Nonsense

Welcome aboard, Dutch.

1) What are your credentials? Please provide earned degrees, date of completion, majors and minors, and universities attended. Please do NOT just say "I'm a professional/scientist/professor/whatever" and expect us to fill in the blanks, as this is a Red Flag of Woo.

2) What have you published? Please provide publication names, dates of publication, titles of articles, names of collaborators, and the names of members on your peer-group review boards. Please do NOT just give vague references to classified governmental, military, commercial, or private documents, as this is a Red Flag of Woo.

3) Why are you persuing this line of research? Is it in line with any of your previous research? How do your credentials (see #1) support this line of inquiry? Please do not just say "I am curious," as this is a Red Flag of Woo.

4) How are you persuing this line of inquiry? Please describe the laboratory you are using, and include the types of equipment you use in your research. If your research is currently theoretical only, then please site the reference materials, as well. Please do not merely give a vague and general description, as this is a Red Flag of Woo.

5) Finally, who is financing your research? Please list the names of the financial resource agencies. If your research is out of your own pocket, then please say so and explain why. Please do not just say "Donors who wish to remain anonymous," as this is a Red Flag of Woo.

Raise one or more of the aforementioned "Red Flags" and you may as well admit to being a mere dreamer involved in pseudo-science, rather than a professional involved in real scientific research. Good Luck.

-Fnord of Dyscordia-

Sorry, Fnord, but I can't agree. You assume that only the "professionals" are entitled to pursue knowledge. You prefer the professional to the amateur. You prefer people who play the publish-or-perish game to those who do not. You prefer people who spend other people's money rather than own.

To 1: Are credentials necessary? Does the absence of credentials that you regard as sufficiently worthy imply that research will be fruitless and should not be attempted? Does the achievement of credentials that you regard as sufficiently worthy guarantee anything other than the means and persistence to jump through hoops?

To 2: Why does a publication history matter to you? I used to be an academic - I know how much of publication is a game that must be played to obtain tenure and to advance. What about not publishing until you have something to say? What about publishing outside of the professional journals? Why play the peer-reviewed game if you don't need the notch in the academic bedpost?

To 3: Outrageous. "I am curious" is the very best reason to pursue a line of research. Who says that you should only have one research interest? What in the world do credentials have to do with this?

To 4: Have a problem with theory? How do you think Einstein would have answered this question? His laboratory was in his imagination and didn't cost a thing. I've done most of my best work with a pad of paper and a pencil, usually sitting in a coffee shop. My laboratory is my mind and, when I need it, is on my laptop computer.

To 5: Why should I expect others to pay for my indulging in my enthusiasms? Do you think that an ability to con others out of someone's hard-earned money makes a researcher or his research more impressive? What about the amateur scientist? Do you think that the rise of the professional science establishment was an utterly good thing?

I've got four degrees, the last being a 1990 Ph.D. in Computer Science from Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, USA.

I was an academic for 5 years after earning my Ph.D. I left academia after several years of disappointment and disgust.

While I am qualified to be a professional scientist, I've chosen to be an amateur scientist. I'm paid to perform various aspects of software engineering, but my real vocation is what I do after hours and at my own expense.

I avoid reading the literature regarding problems that I am wrestling with. I want to think about a problem with as fresh a mind as I can muster and do not want to get stuck in the ruts of the explorations of others.

I've done a great deal of research over the years on several significant problems. I think that I have some noteworthy results and will have more important results over the next year or so. For my own reasons, I have only shared this work with a few friends. I have given myself the gift of conducting my research precisely as I wish.

I have published very little. I currently am writing up the results of 20 years of unfunded research so that everything won't be lost when I die. With one or two possible exceptions (due to competition requirements), I have no interest in publishing anything in a journal - I'll put it up on my website.

I do research because I love it and I am curious. I pursue problems that interest me.

As I said, all I need are time, a pad of paper, a pen, and occasionally a computer to try things out on.

I think that I understand what you were trying to do in your post, and it is not without merit, but your generalizations are grotesque.

 

[The Atheist]

Back for another round of silliness.

Dutch. This thread would be much better if your parents had used a Dutch Cap.

 

[Dutch]

just a quick post, it's family time

I love it when somebody posts info on the HDDesign forum that says exactly what I'm trying to tell. I have copy and pasted it so you can read it here in full:

SYNCHRONICITY
THE BRIDGE BETWEEN MATTER AND MIND
by F. DAVID PEAT PhD

http://hddesign.forumup.nl/post-3778-hddesign.html#3778

 

[GodMark2]

just a quick post, it's family time

I love it when somebody posts info on the HDDesign forum that says exactly what I'm trying to tell. I have copy and pasted it so you can read it here in full:

SYNCHRONICITY
THE BRIDGE BETWEEN MATTER AND MIND
by F. DAVID PEAT PhD

http://hddesign.forumup.nl/post-3778-hddesign.html#3778

Dutch, do you even bother to read the questions we are raising? You have yet to answer even the simplest.

I will continue to wait patiently for an answer to my prior (unanswered) question, but I will not let you forget that the question needs an answer.

 

[shuyun]

stating the obvious

excuse me Dutch,

nothing to do with your theory, but..ahhem... your spelling of CalenDAR, is bugging me a bit. I thought at first it was a typo but then as others used it as a sort of private joke of sorts (calenDER) you didn't seem to notice it either.

As to your pinpointing special dates. How is this any different from astrology that relies on the zodiac for determining stuff. Like first and foremost, the constellations aren't actually there.

Even our calenDAR was based arbitrarily on the supposed birthdate of Christ, which was also a miscaculation on Gregory's part? So could your hyper-polyhedron be misoriented by 4 or six years?

 

[Dutch]

The killing of Rafik Hariri is still to be considered the initial trigger in an evolving Syria-first war scenario, despite the Iran conditioning. Sure, we are told the navy is out there to change Iran's mind on the nuclear issue, which is indeed the major theme of the Design of our times, but the situation regarding Iran doesn't bare the biggest risk for war, at least that's what the Design seems to imply according to my understanding.

The commission has also widened its inquiry to include attacks on its own team, the murder of Lebanese minister Pierre Gemayel in 2006 and the Ain Alaq bus bombings near Beirut last month.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6477333.stm
The suspects in relation to these bus bombings were arrested during the HD Tetrahedron timeframe around March 12:
Arrests over Lebanon bus bombings
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6448535.stm

They said the four men who were arrested were Syrians.

and in relation to the Hariri killer:

The identity of one of the bombers who was killed in the blast is still unknown, but DNA tests on 33 body parts have suggested that he was not a native of Lebanon.
The team may be able to trace his home country from the high levels of lead he was exposed to as a child.
Geographical samples have been taken from a number of Middle East regions including Syria.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6477333.stm
Ever since Hariri was killed on Cube date february 14, 2005, we have seen developments related to the Hariri/Syria situation on every HD Cube or Tetrahedron date as anticipated and monitored on the HDDesign forum.
I expect further developments related to the Hariri/Syria situation as possible initial trigger in the evolving war scenario during the HD Tetrahedron and Cube dates that are coming up

 

[Paul]

at least that's what the Design seems to imply according to my understanding.

There's your problem.

 

[Paulhoff]

Some people need a world with order and purpose so badly that when they look into a book of random numbers they will see patterns.

Paul

 

[GodMark2]

Dutch, do you even bother to read the questions we are raising? You have yet to answer even the simplest.

I will continue to wait patiently for an answer to my prior (unanswered) question, but I will not let you forget that the question needs an answer.

Dutch, you've officially reached the "Person unwilling to listed to criticism" stage, and are therefore unworthy of a customized response.

I will continue to wait patiently for an answer to my prior (unanswered) question, but I will not let you forget that the question needs an answer.

 

[Dutch]

GodMark2,

just walked through the thread quickly, which question do you want further explained?

 

[Dutch]

updated : May 2

May 2, 2007 - Golden Mean Phi based 'Srebrenica karma'. Washington.link.
3 Mars years in Earth days since 9/11, 3 Mars years in earth days prior to the end of the Mayan Calender
from Goro: Mayan Contact Midpoint, see update below.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali threathened in the US, heavy security/protection needed

Ayaan Hirsi Ali is working for the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
http://www.aei.org/
Ayaan has written a book:

Infidel

In her remarkable and unflinchingly honest memoir, Ayaan Hirsi Ali recounts her journey from what she calls "the world of faith to the world of reason."

http://www.aei.org/books/bookID.870/book_detail.asp
Since 3 weeks she's been protected by US security people after she has been threathened. article in Dutch:
Hirsi Ali zwaar bewaakt na concrete bedreiging
http://www.nu.nl/news/1021488/22/Hirsi_Ali_zwaar_bewaakt_na_concrete_bedreiging.html
on June 1 last year I wrote:

I expect that the 911 based Phi spiral will continue and will give related events in the future.
Remember that we are also talking about Srebrenica Karma here and that Ayaan has moved to Washington
next date on the spiral:
May 2, 2007 ( 911 days after the murder of Theo van Gogh )

Read the whole thread and keep it in mind for the timeframe around May 2, 2007:
911 based Phi spiral in Dutch society
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/about87-hddesign.html

 

[GodMark2]

GodMark2,

just walked through the thread quickly, which question do you want further explained?

That's nice Dutch, but have you been able to give any further thought to this question?

How can you tell the difference between important events and unimportant ones?

You give us many more events, which appear to my untrained eye to be the same as events from days that have nothing to do with your "special day identification" method.

Without some way to tell how these events are special, we cannot see if they are associated with any special pattern.

All you have shown so far is: "These days have events", and you would be hard pressed to find any day for which that did not hold true.

To turn that into "These days have special events", you need to show how the events are special.

If you could articulate some way to separate them, we would no longer have to deal with 'everything that happens'. We could then limit the discussion to the events that you claim should be correlated to these 'crossings'.

Alternatatively, what type of events should be predicted by your method? By knowing this, we could begin looking at all events that fit into that category to see if there is a correlation. There is no need to 'put everything that happens into perspective', only the events you claim to be affected.

If there is no way to differientiate between days asociated with a 'crossing' and other days, then of what use and/or meaning are these 'crossings'?

..........

 

[Thomas1016]

lol, say what?

basicly what he sounds like he is trying to do is put a scientific lable to new age mysticism.

 

[TriangleMan]

Dutch has also been keeping some BAUT posters in his merry-go-round as well, I think the thread there is up to 37 pages.

This quote sums up that BAUT thread nicely:

You know, Dutch, maybe it should tell you something when we can't tell the difference between stuff you just kind of make up and the stuff you claim proves your point.

Nothing more to see here.

 

[Dutch]

GodMark2:

How can you tell the difference between important events and unimportant ones?

Events at the macro level orientation of the Platonic Solids seems to be significant, high impact or subtle. 9/11 and the Madrid bombings at the Tetrahedron at macro level orientation, Hariri killed at Cube, etc.

I think every event is important and is somehow part of an underlying timecoded pattern. I have a focus on the macro level, as we are all involved with these somehow

You give us many more events, which appear to my untrained eye to be the same as events from days that have nothing to do with your "special day identification" method.

Without some way to tell how these events are special, we cannot see if they are associated with any special pattern.

All you have shown so far is: "These days have events", and you would be hard pressed to find any day for which that did not hold true.

To turn that into "These days have special events", you need to show how the events are special.

I keep an eye on alot of possibly timecoded patterns and I try to keep track on them in seperated threads. The different patterns are all based on the same principles of Design as described in the material. I started to work with this timeline for future dates in order to organize a bit.
In fact a complete understanding of the Underlying Design should enable us to put everything that happens into perspective but I don't think that's possible for the human mind. The events that show indications of underlying Design at macrolevel are another story: they seem to be giving the opportunity to decode so to speak, like somekind of 'communication', unveiled by the hidden underlying Geometry.

My knowledge of the concepts is very limited but developping. What looks unrelated or coincidental today could very well be understood as related in the future

If you could articulate some way to separate them, we would no longer have to deal with 'everything that happens'. We could then limit the discussion to the events that you claim should be correlated to these 'crossings'.

Alternatatively, what type of events should be predicted by your method? By knowing this, we could begin looking at all events that fit into that category to see if there is a correlation. There is no need to 'put everything that happens into perspective', only the events you claim to be affected.

If there is no way to differientiate between days asociated with a 'crossing' and other days, then of what use and/or meaning are these 'crossings'?

That's why I have started this timeline. The indications of underlying Design are posted realtime in relation to the future dates on the timeline, based on the elements of Design as described. When I notice new indications I add it to the timeline.

 

[Dutch]

basicly what he sounds like he is trying to do is put a scientific lable to new age mysticism.

I'm sharing my findings and I expect that everyone could understand the significance eventually if we take the time to see how the anticipations on the timeline will work out. I don't do exact predictions, I'm setting the stage so to speak.

 

[Michael Gray]

A very poor attempt at trolling.
I give "her" 1 out of 10.

 

[GodMark2]

Events at the macro level orientation of the Platonic Solids seems to be significant, high impact or subtle.

Wow! So, you're saying that events on these days can either be important or unimportant, and then say that that shows that the days are important.

I think every event is important and is somehow part of an underlying timecoded pattern. I have a focus on the macro level, as we are all involved with these somehow

Well, if every event is important, then how does listing events show certain days to be important? Every day would have important events, if all events are important.

I keep an eye on alot of possibly timecoded patterns and I try to keep track on them in seperated threads. The different patterns are all based on the same principles of Design as described in the material. I started to work with this timeline for future dates in order to organize a bit.
In fact a complete understanding of the Underlying Design should enable us to put everything that happens into perspective but I don't think that's possible for the human mind. The events that show indications of underlying Design at macrolevel are another story: they seem to be giving the opportunity to decode so to speak, like somekind of 'communication', unveiled by the hidden underlying Geometry.

My knowledge of the concepts is very limited but developping. What looks unrelated or coincidental today could very well be understood as related in the future

That's why I have started this timeline. The indications of underlying Design are posted realtime in relation to the future dates on the timeline, based on the elements of Design as described. When I notice new indications I add it to the timeline.

So you only look for events on the days you already deem to be important, and Voila! You see important events. What about the days that your method doesn't deem important? Voila! They also have important events.

You need to show that the days not associated with your special method are different from the days addociated with your special method.

You have not yet done this.

 

[GodMark2]

Ok, Dutch, let's run a gedankenexperiment. Actually, it’s more of a meta-gedankenexperiment, a thought experiment about running an experiment.

I have a bag of marbles.

I claim to have a foolproof way of pulling only white marbles from the bag, and not black ones.

Count each time you pull a marble, starting at one. Every marble pulled from the bag at a prime count (Not counting 2, because it’s also even, so it’s special. Nor counting one, because it can be argued that it’s not really prime) will be white!

So, you pull marbles, while I watch.

1
2
3 It’s WHITE
4
5 It’s WHITE
6
7 It’s WHITE
8
9
10
11 It’s WHITE

Wow! It looks like I’ve got a perfect method.

Only It’s garbage. See, you need to look at the remaining days.

1 It’s WHITE
2 It’s WHITE
3 It’s WHITE
4 It’s WHITE
5 It’s WHITE
6 It’s WHITE
7 It’s WHITE
8 It’s WHITE
9 It’s WHITE
10 It’s WHITE
11 It’s WHITE

Yeah, every prime pull is white, but that’s pretty meaningless when EVERY pull is white.

Without a DIFFERENCE between the IMPORTANT pulls (in my case, the prime pulls) and the UNIMPORTANT pulls (the non-prime pulls) there isn’t anything worth considering.

So, what is the DIFFERENCE between your IMPORTANT days, and your UNIMPORTANT days?

 

[Dutch]

GodMark2

Wow! So, you're saying that events on these days can either be important or unimportant, and then say that that shows that the days are important.

Why should every HD date show planes flying in to towers?

What I call Hyper Dimensional dates are the HD dates at macro level, expressing the major themes. The orientation of the Solids at the highest level.

The system of 911 patterns ( also as used as triggerdates) is in fact creating a HD Tetrahedron for instance, but with a different orientation.
Look at the example I have given about the 911 based Golden mean spiral in Dutch society: Pim Fortuyn was killed on 9/11 and Theo van Gogh on the Madrid bombings. 911+events day is connecting 2 dots of the HD tetrahedron and they can take every 'direction', only the highest top level is expressing at the main Tetrahedron or other solids.

Golden Mean inspiralling gives a Tetrahedron on Venus like Theo van Gogh killed and Ayaan Hirshi Ali exit from Dutch Parliament

If we could freeze a single moment of our reality, then everything could be described by using this Hyper Dimensional Design, if we had a complete understanding of the concepts. That's impossible for the human mind, we can only start to see some correlations that unveil the Design.
That we don't see all correlations doesn't mean they are not there.

Only the themes expressed at top level seem to give opportunity for understanding part of the concepts and maybe that's the purpose of these events in the first place, who knows.

A better understanding of the Geometry will enable us to put more events into perspective

Well, if every event is important, then how does listing events show certain days to be important? Every day would have important events, if all events are important.

indeed, a complete understanding of the concepts should be able to describe the hidden underlying correlations. I have a focus on the main orientation of the solids and all other indications of timecoded patterns are logged realtime on the HDDesign forum ( I use it as a tool )

So you only look for events on the days you already deem to be important, and Voila! You see important events. What about the days that your method doesn't deem important? Voila! They also have important events.

You need to show that the days not associated with your special method are different from the days addociated with your special method.

You have not yet done this.

Yes I have done this in the past. I determined the triggerevents for a randomm future date so I could set the stage for this day with a few key words. This way I mentioned the outbreak of the birdflu for instance, corresponding with the actual first outbreak in China. Back than I did these things for fun but it is a timeconsuming thing to do. The triggerdates have to be set, the events that matter have to be 'filtered' by tuning, the other elements of Design need to be applied and so on. That was a few years ago and the results were all posted on several forums.