You are a man of few words but in this case they are the correct onesIn other words, since he obviously can not impress us with brilliance, he will try to baffle us with bushllit.
Or something like that ...![]()
You are a man of few words but in this case they are the correct onesIn other words, since he obviously can not impress us with brilliance, he will try to baffle us with bushllit.
Or something like that ...![]()
"... he is the only one that can correctly interpret the entanglement since we are all stuck intellectually on a brane in the third dimension while he is like a graviton and able to change dimensions at will."
You call a request for evidence leniency? Here I was hoping to fill his argument so full of little holes that there would be more empty space than fabric, and you come along and nuke his statement en toto!
![]()
Cool!
The dates on the timeline were determined in 2006 with a few additions ( mentioned in the related thread)
All dates are +/- 1 day. Not only because of the time differences on Earth but also because these dates are in fact related to Geometrically determined specific area's on Earth's orbit around the Sun, corresponding with our system of dates. How large these specific ares are is unknown but I normally use the +/- 1 day correction, although it might be valid to extend the window. Consider the given dates as 'peak' dates, getting momentum towards and lessening in effect afterwards.
I will mention the dates with a short explanation and/or keywords, or a link to the related threads for specific information
The list will be updated regularly and developments will be monitored and anticipated on in the related threads
regardless the calender, 9/11 and the Madrid bombings correspond with 2 'dots' of the HD TetrahedronSo you are saying that all events show up in all calendars?
It is worth noting, however, that Dutch's technobabble bears a striking similarity to the Technobabble that Geordi LaForge used when he pulled the Enterprise out of a tough scrape each week.
"If we can quantum-manifold the hyperdimensinal bypass inhibitors, we can cause a synchrotron fluctuation in the subspace resonance field and hopefully restabilize the ambivulent bivationary falvebarms."
Considering the orbit isn't circular and the sun isn't in the center but at the focus (center of mass of BOTH earth and sun - the barycenter BOTH bodies orbit), does it matter if the sun is at the right focus, center or left focus? Wouldn't that throw a wrench in your HD bs?GodMark2,
the keydates on the 2007 timeline are somehow connected to the already determined HD dates, marker events that already happened or ongoing timecoded patterns
I have a focus on the macro level, its just mnot possible to put everything that happens into perspective
"If we can quantum-manifold the hyperdimensinal bypass inhibitors, we can cause a synchrotron fluctuation in the subspace resonance field and hopefully restabilize the ambivulent bivationary falvebarms."
GodMark2,
the keydates on the 2007 timeline are somehow connected to the already determined HD dates, marker events that already happened or ongoing timecoded patterns
I have a focus on the macro level, its just mnot possible to put everything that happens into perspective
March 12, 2006 (+/- 1 day) coincided with the 'Balkan Karma' timecoded pattern and the death of Milosevic could be considered a hit as I wrote:From what I understand of the apparent indications of Multi Dimensional Design ‘bleeding’ through in our 3- dimensional reality, it seems that the timeframe around March 12 could be considered a key date on the emerging patterns.
The date March 12 in a non-leap year is comparable to September 11, both Tetrahedron based HD dates.
March 12 is also a key date on several time-coded patterns which are monitored here.
The 2 major underlying themes of the Design of our times as mentioned repeatedly in the material are:I expect some Syria related info, high impact or subtle. Hariri was killed on HD Cube date Feb 14 (2005).
The UN report accusing Syria was published on the last Tetrahedron date October 21 (2005).
==snip==
we are talking about 9/11 related events here with a nuclear theme on the background
another possibility is that someone will be taken out by Design
How can you tell the difference between important events and unimportant ones?
If you could articulate some way to separate them, we would no longer have to deal with 'everything that happens'. We could then limit the discussion to the events that you claim should be correlated to these 'crossings'.
Alternatatively, what type of events should be predicted by your method? By knowing this, we could begin looking at all events that fit into that category to see if there is a correlation. There is no need to 'put everything that happens into perspective', only the events you claim to be affected.
If there is no way to differientiate between days asociated with a 'crossing' and other days, then of what use and/or meaning are these 'crossings'?
Are you sure that's wise, they might reach sociodynamic critical mass and then we'd never stop them.Can someone please introduce Dutch to Davidjayjordan.
I could find the word sociodynamic but isodynamic critical mass may be closer to it, all we could hope for is that they are opposite like matter and anti-matter and cancel each other out of our lives.Are you sure that's wise, they might reach sociodynamic critical mass and then we'd never stop them.
It's just not worth the risk.![]()
I could find the word sociodynamic
the existence of sufficient momentum in a social system such that the momentum becomes self-sustaining and fuels further growth..
Well all words are not word at first, they are all new at one time. I wasn't calling you on it for not being a word, I just wanted to try another one for the F of it. No we don't have to worry about them, there is nothing behind them but wind, very cold wind.I'm not claiming it's real, I found it in a sociology stub on wikipedia, but the concept is scary enough in this case:
...shudder...