Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
There's no doubt Fortuyn played a major role in Dutch politics. But is your contention that he might have been prime minster that true? I'll admit all I have to go on is Pim Fortyn's wikipedia entry, and the English one at that. But there I read:
How would he become prime minister with only 17% of the seats? Or could he have made prime minister in a coalition government?
Not that it makes any difference, it was a high profile assassination in The Netherlands. It was his personal objective to become Prime Minister yes. The LPF was a winner, The Nerherlands always has coalition government, we do have a choice in our multi party system you know. The LPF without Pim was nothing. The point is that he was a highprofile politician who was assassinated just prior to the elections.
Why is the number 911 important to HDD?
Because this timeframe is the number of days between 2 interference areas of a Hyper Dimensional Tetrahedron, no matter what 'orientation'.
In this case May 6, 2002 - November 2, 2004
Can you provide a link to this spiral on your forum, please?
911 based Phi spiral in Dutch society
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/about87-hddesign.html
Balkan Karma Venus based
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/about4-hddesign.html
Actually, we've used these terms many times to describe it: cherry-picking, data mining, and remembering the hits and forgetting the misses.
You fail to see that this is different than cherry picking. When I identify a specific underlying theme for a future date than you can't just say I'm cherry picking. When I talk about the desintegration of MIR for instance, and Jules Verne comes down at that date it has nothing to do with cherrypicking. This does not happen every day. When I talk about the 'Cuba missile crisis' and suddenly it comes indeed to the surface in the US Precidential campaigns than it has nothing to do with cherry picking. There are numerous example of this in the material. Its way to easy to dismiss this as cherry pickking.
Not at all. But had significant events occurred on the days you listed (+/- 1 day), that may have been a something worth investigating. The fact you had to go outside even that generous scope shows that you're really stretching things. There's also the fact it's difficult to define "significant", especially in today's world with its 24-hour news stations.
Again I have to remind you of the fact that I have regularly stated that I have limited the timeframes to +/- 1 day in order to make it easier to identify possible timecoded patterns. Especially when I try to 'filter' random themes out of the triggerdates in relation to future eventsdays.
I have said that the determined keydate is to be considered a timeframe whit expected expressions of the identified underlying themes around the determined dated. I have said that the +/- 1 day is way too rigid.
When it comes to the determinations of a spiral I don't round up in such margins, the determined key dates should be considered timeframes though
Please define "peaked" in this context. Why is July 11, 1995 so important in the events surrounding this massacre?
I have explained that. These events took place during several day in July 1995. It takes days to hunt down these people, seperate them and shoot them to death. I thought you would understand that there's no exact moment or even an exact day in relation to the Srebrenica massacre. Its a perfect example that your focus on this +/- 1 day limitation is ridiculous, I have said repeatedly that a few days around the calculated date could give opportunity for expressions.
I think you're confusing an endless chasing after details with research. Research involves more than the gathering of data: it also involves a hypothesis (you have that - HDD), a certain amount of organization (which you seem to lack), and a willingness to accept a negative conclusion (which you most certainly are not willing to do.) Indeed, I think the reason you're so obsessed with following the timelines is because you keep getting misses and have to look even further to find a few hits.
I don't do research. I do try to detect the underlying timecoded patterns and themes by endless chasing. I take intuitive insights serious and I follow up on synchronicities. There's no organization at all, I take it as it comes. I don't plan, I never know where this is heading to. Somehow there's somekind of 'tuning' because the correlations that pop up are based on the described elements of HDDesign. I'm not endlessly seeking for correlations or cherry picking. It all happens in a few seconds, there's a thought or synchronicity, I notice the correlations and I post it.
OK, good. Is there something like a "Hyper Dimensional Design for Dummies" page on your site? In case you're not familiar with the reference, the "for Dummies" series is a collection of books on various topics, usually computer related but they do branch into other areas. They start from the assumption that the reader has no prior experience with the topic, and go from there.
I started to make summaries and posted them in the 'work in progress' section of the forum. Not much in there though, I just lack the time to do so. It could be a help to walk through the HDDesign threads on other forums ( they are listed at HDDesign forum) in which I have tried to explain alot. Its impossible for me to go ahead and to rewrite everything at the same time. I just can't, its not possible.
Actually, Dutch, mankind's destiny is completely unaffected by HDDesign. In that way it's like astrology and homeopathy: interesting to study, but of no impact.
That's what you believe. Understanding of what this is really about might bring you to the comprehension that other options are open and that infact it might even be possible that other dimensions are even 'leading' to what happens in our 3D reality. You just think this is not possible, these 'coincidences' and synchronicities show me differently
I can see why you're trying to take a longer term approach to this. However, as we have pointed out many times, we're not even convinced there is an effect worth studying. A case in point is where you summarily linked the "911 in Dutch Society" timeline with the US Presidential election. Your opinion is that this reveals hidden themes, which in turn reveals an underlying Design. Our opinion is a combination of non sequitur ("it does not follow") and Occam's Razor. The most straightforward explanation is there is no relation, thus there is no need to invoke a magical entity attempt to explain such a link.
Ofcourse you think like that, thats how your mind is conditioned to function in this reality. Lets wait and see what happens than.
