Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

That's nothing, he once tried to conflate two words that sound alike, the Pheidippidean marathon myth, the tragic death of a runner, and an air crash.

It would suit you to place this in the right context. This makes no sense.

 

[Dutch]

I skipped your oneliner posts Paul. Make your point in a post

 

[Dutch]

the position of Mercury with respect to the Earth has no such correlation.

the actual position relative to Earth is irrelevant, as is the shape of the orbit and the actual 3D position on the orbit. It takes a specific number of Earthday to make a full orbit of the planets. That's it.

Even if events happen precisely (say) 351.8764 days apart, which is the length of time it takes Mercury to make four complete revolutions around the sun, the Earth has also moved in that time, so things are no longer in the same alignment as when the initial event occurred.

It doesn't matter. This is not astrology. I talk about orbits of planets, not as seen from Earth

About the only time you could even hint that Mercury might have an effect on events on Earth is when they are aligned, either on the same side of the Sun or the opposite, or perhaps at 90 degree angles. But those events don't happen on 87 or 365 day periods, because both planets are in motion.

Although an alignment could be significant, its not really part of this HDDesign.

Use a planetarium program to position yourself over the Sun's North pole, then watch as Mercury and the Earth orbit. I did that myself, and by using a straightedge to determine when the Sun, Mercury, and Earth were all in a straight line, came up with the following dates:
* 26 Nov 2008
* 28 Jan 2009 (55 days later)
* 20 March 2009 (69 days later)
* 18 May 2009 (49 days later)

Now I would have expected the number of days between conjunctions to be more even. The fact they are not means either I don't understand orbital mechanics (I don't!) or I was too lax in deciding just what constituted a straight line when I had my ruler against the screen.

Having said all that, it's simply astrological nonsense to believe that anything Mercury, Venus, or Mars do as they go around the Sun has any effect at all on events on Earth.

like I said, thsi has nothing to do with astrology or what it looks like in 3D. I talk about orbits of the rotating elements in our solarssystem, not as seen from Earth or the sun or whatever.

 

[Paulhoff]

Sorry Dutch, but you have a very big problem, you are completely clueless and don't see that you are on to nothing.

None of the planet orbits are circular just for starters, but still you will work that into your clueless ideas.

Sorry.


Paul

 

[Dutch]

Dutch, you've been doing this stuff for years and years, and have never proved anything. How's "only" 30 days at BAUT going to change anything?

because they decided this HDDesign is nonsense while I posted my expectations for future keydates that indeed materialized.
I would have liked to discuss these outcomes with those people at Baut, its an insult to human intelligence that I was not allowed to do so. You have been able to make up your mind about what happend on that forum during the beginning of 2007 and you were given the opportunity to read about my expectations fur June that year in relation to 'srebrenica karma'. I guess I don't have to repost it here again. The fact that you were not surprised or dismissed it, says something about your rown attitude towards this material: you just don't like the thoughts, so you just dismiss these correlations as coincidental. Time after time after time...

There are people overthere I would like to dicuss with. I have talked to people in pm and showed to them how they subconsciously were contributing to this material. It was so obvious and clear, but dismissed anyway.

Its ridiculous to give such a complex matter a 30 days period to prove. Its an insult to the progress of mankind

 

[Paulhoff]

Sorry Dutch, but you have a very big problem, you are completely clueless and don't see that you are on to nothing.

None of the planet orbits are circular just for starters, but still you will work that into your clueless ideas.

Sorry.

Paul



And it does matter, this IS astrology. You talk about orbits of planets, it doesn't matter from where you see them.

 

[Dutch]

Sorry Dutch, but you have a very big problem, you are completely clueless and don't see that you are on to nothing.

None of the planet orbits are circular just for starters, but still you will work that into your clueless ideas.

Sorry.


Paul

Paulhoff. Go read

the shape of on orbit doesn't matter, enough said

 

[AWPrime]

So 9/11 and the Madrid bombings aren't significant?

There are so many terrorist attacks that they aren't truly significant. I would expect some more solid from a theory that should have global effect. However your clippings show that its limited to one POV.

 

[Blue Mountain]

Hi Dutch,

In English we have a phrase: "From the outside looking in," and I'm sure you have a similar saying in Dutch. The concept is that a casual observer sees things differently than one immersed in that same thing.

I'll grant that it's a double-edge sword. An outside observer can miss nuances and subtleties that only experience can show up. As a computer systems professional, I see this a lot. Customers often have no idea what goes into designing and delivering a complex computer system. (The smarter ones do catch on after a while.)

However, from a skeptical point of view, people have several cognitive shortcomings that prevent them from appreciating just how badly they're missing an obvious point. These shortcomings go under the collective term of "logical fallacies." In your case, Dutch, the biggest ones we see are confirmation bias followed by its close cousin cherry-picking the data.

As skeptics, we reject astrology because of the problems inherent in it. However, every problem exhibited by astrology (lack of a mechanism, confusing correlation and causation, confirmation bias, post hoc ergo propter hoc, and special pleading) applies equally well to Hyper Dimensional Design.

Remember the story of the Emperor's new clothes. You're the Emperor here, and we're the little kid stating the obvious.

 

[Paulhoff]

Paulhoff. Go read

the shape of on orbit doesn't matter, enough said

Then nothing matters because you give no reason why the shape matters or doesn't matter, it therefore means nothing.

Paul

 

[Paul]

I skipped your oneliner posts Paul. Make your point in a post

If you have no answers, fine, just admit it, using silly excuses only makes you look bad.

 

[Paul]

What do you know about my observation? I experienced this synchronicity.

I know that when you say October 8 just popped up, it's not true; I showed you all the references you had to ignore to get to it.

Not to mention that you haven't checked when the Hawking interview was conducted.

 

[Paul]

It would suit you to place this in the right context. This makes no sense.

I know it makes no sense, that's why I mentioned it.

 

[Paul]

the actual position relative to Earth is irrelevant, as is the shape of the orbit and the actual 3D position on the orbit. It takes a specific number of Earthday to make a full orbit of the planets. That's it...

...This is not astrology. I talk about orbits of planets, not as seen from Earth...

...thsi has nothing to do with astrology or what it looks like in 3D. I talk about orbits of the rotating elements in our solarssystem, not as seen from Earth or the sun or whatever.

What do planets orbit around? It's called the sun and it's at the centre of our solar system, hence the name.

If you use geometry, you must by default, be concerned with relative positions and if your subjects are in 3D space you must be concerned with relative positions within that space.

Now you claim to use platonic solids which must be in 3D space, as part of HDDesign. Using the interaction of solid shapes and the orbits of bodies in 3 dimensions necessitates the careful calculation of the precise positions of all relevant points.

You cannot claim to show interactions with nominal platonic solids if you ignore the actual position of the interacting body.

If you want to use numerology for HDDesign, that's an entirely different kettle of foetid dingo's kidneys.

 

[Dutch]

What do planets orbit around? It's called the sun and it's at the centre of our solar system, hence the name.

If you use geometry, you must by default, be concerned with relative positions and if your subjects are in 3D space you must be concerned with relative positions within that space.

Now you claim to use platonic solids which must be in 3D space, as part of HDDesign. Using the interaction of solid shapes and the orbits of bodies in 3 dimensions necessitates the careful calculation of the precise positions of all relevant points.

You cannot claim to show interactions with nominal platonic solids if you ignore the actual position of the interacting body.

If you want to use numerology for HDDesign, that's an entirely different kettle of foetid dingo's kidneys.

sighhh, the platonic solids don't have shape in 3D, their existence is only indirectly detectable by corresponding intersection area's on orbits. The actual 3D position is irrelevant, the platonic solid geometry is still valid.

 

[Dutch]

I know that when you say October 8 just popped up, it's not true; I showed you all the references you had to ignore to get to it.

Not to mention that you haven't checked when the Hawking interview was conducted.

I see you don't understand how intuitive insights in combination with synchronicities work. You could have read about how this 'rersearch' works, its a psychic 'excercise' in a sense that the intuitive new insight is combined with a synchronicity. instantly.

 

[Dutch]

However, from a skeptical point of view, people have several cognitive shortcomings that prevent them from appreciating just how badly they're missing an obvious point. These shortcomings go under the collective term of "logical fallacies." In your case, Dutch, the biggest ones we see are confirmation bias followed by its close cousin cherry-picking the data.

so when I talk about the desintegration of mir as underlying theme for a specific future date and when that day comes Jules Verne desintegrates, than it is a confirmation bias or just a cherry pick out of all the desintegrations from space that day?

As skeptics, we reject astrology because of the problems inherent in it. However, every problem exhibited by astrology (lack of a mechanism, confusing correlation and causation, confirmation bias, post hoc ergo propter hoc, and special pleading) applies equally well to Hyper Dimensional Design.

I know nothing about astrology, do you know about HDDesign?

 

[Paul]

sighhh, the platonic solids don't have shape in 3D, their existence is only indirectly detectable by corresponding intersection area's on orbits.

So they must exist mathematically, which means the actual orbits are essential to any calculation.

The actual 3D position is irrelevant, the platonic solid geometry is still valid.

Are you aware of cognitive dissonance?

 

[Paul]

I see you don't understand how intuitive insights in combination with synchronicities work.

So far all we've seen is confirmation bias and coincidence.

You could have read about how this 'rersearch' works

How many reasonable request for explanations have you ignored now?

its a psychic 'excercise' in a sense that the intuitive new insight is combined with a synchronicity. instantly.

So everything you've been trying to say about this being real or having genuine value is untrue?

 

[Mister Earl]

I've asked Dutch to explain his process from beginning to end, with all math included, in order for us to test his hypothesis scientifically. That was two or three years ago. He refuses to do so. There is nothing to his HD design. I haven't read this most recent thread, but I imagine it is the same as all of his others. Tons and tons of cherry-picked information held aloft as proof without clarifying any questions he is given. Myriads of terms invented or redefined. Dutch has Obfuscation down like an expert.