Hyper Dimensional Design

[Daylightstar]

... this complicated material. ...

It's not about 'the material', it's about you.
You appear to have a somewhat complicated, difficult to remedy issue going on.

 

[Daylightstar]

The hidden intelligent correlations between our 3D reality and other dimensional expressions are based on our perception of time yes. ...

No, not really,
It is quite evident that what you call 'intelligent correlations' are based on what happens between your ears, only.

It is your activities here and elsewhere on the net which more than plausibly establish this conclusion.

However, please feel free to attempt to properly respond to Mister Earl's repeated friendly request.
I should probably add to that, within your capabilities ......

Hi, Dutch!

If you'd be so kind, please respond to my request made to you several years ago on the BAUT forums you used to post on before you got banned for refusing to back up your claims.

I remind you, my request was to have you outline your entire process, to include all math and graphs so that we may attempt to replicate your methods.
...

 

[The Man]

In wich context did I say that? Don't take a remark out of context man

You're making me laugh man.

Its you who didn't critically examine the HDDesign material and yet you think you can allow yourselves the opinion that you are expressing here.

That's what I mean when i say you have no right for talking.

If you don't understand this I feel sorry for you.

You have made sceptical thinking into an objective. leads to nowhere, but I guess you didn't found that out yet.

There's still hope for you, keep the ehad up!

man:



is it that difficult to answer this question? focus man!

man, your opinion isn't based on real indepth investigation of the material.

After all this years you haven't proceeded beyond a prejudice

If it was your intent to address these posts to me then I’ll ask you again to please try harder Dutch.

 

[The Man]

If you were truly willing to help, you would do your best to comprehend this complicated material.

It ain’t complicated Dutch. You correlate events by date according to formula or combinations of formula of your own choosing, applied to those dates, then add your own interpretation and ascribe it all to some undemonstrative “other expressions of consciousness in other dimensional realms”. Contrived yes but certainly not complicated at all. See I just explained the difference between 'contrived' and 'complicated', I am quite willing to help. Who's contrivance it actually is however, that, unfortunately only you can help yourself with.

You have never given any sigh that you do so. You have wasted your time by making stand-alone remaks about out of context details. You aren't seriously involved with this, not at all unfortunately

I have time to waste, my remarks certainly don’t “stand-alone” and you seriously have nothing to be “involved with”. It’s all just your own inclinations you evidently just don’t want to take responsibility for.

I'm expecting that it will eventually open your eyes. that's the only reason I'm here, because I do understand the signifigance.

"the signifigance"? of what, your own inclinations? Of such significance to you, they are, that you simply chose to ascribe them to some “other expressions of consciousness in other dimensional realms”? Open your eyes Dutch, If you can't own the position yourself then it is anything but significant to you.

The hidden intelligent correlations between our 3D reality and other dimensional expressions are based on our perception of time yes.

No Dutch your “correlations” (while admittedly, by you, are based entirely on the singular dimension of time) are neither intelligent nor hidden they are simply created at your discretion and inclination.

Time in itself is meaningless, unless you try to say that HDDesign is meaningless. In that case you have chosen the wrong words.

You choose the word. Stop trying to blame others, including “other expressions of consciousness in other dimensional realms”, for your own inclinations and poor choice of wording.

Funny that you say I'm ignoring opportunities, you are already starting to talk like me. Keep some distance if I may advice you.

Funny indeed as I don’t speak any Dutch. Just what language do you think we are conversing in here, not Dutch or even mathematics, just English perchance? Seems you’ve been deliberately attempting to talk like me while still deliberately ignoring opportunities. Funny how that actually works out, ain’t it?

In all seriousness, Dutch, if you want to oppose manned space exploration or use of nuclear power (is it just fission or fusion as well?) there are plenty of valid reasons to do so. Most of them in the very news reports you’ve been reading. The deficiency of claiming some “other expressions of consciousness in other dimensional realms” have been telling you this by “hidden intelligent correlations” from whatever dimension(s) you imagine is that it tells someone else exactly the opposite by no “hidden intelligent correlations” from whatever dimension(s) or by “hidden intelligent correlations” from some higher dimension(s). In the end Dutch it is all just you, so only you can end it for yourself.

 

[Daylightstar]

...
Sure, you have an irrational, possibly pathological belief, which you want to force onto others. ...

Very recent example:

I'm waiting for Orphia to reply, because I'm not done yet with her

 

[Sideroxylon]

Hi, Dutch!

If you'd be so kind, please respond to my request made to you several years ago on the BAUT forums you used to post on before you got banned for refusing to back up your claims.

I remind you, my request was to have you outline your entire process, to include all math and graphs so that we may attempt to replicate your methods.

I predict you will again refuse and obfuscate the issue with more word salad.

If you don't do this, Dutch, your oh-so-important HDD discovery will be lost forever when you pass on. Oh, the loss for humanity!

 

[Wolrab]

I have posted 3 'experimental predictions' on the HDdesign forum, in an area only I have access, only to find out if it matters if expectations are shared to the public or not. that was an experiment as it was called.

Wow. How did that work out for you? Overwhelming success I'd bet.

 

[Daylightstar]

Wow. How did that work out for you? Overwhelming success I'd bet.

Not even vaguely approaching the stunningly proven accuracy of Plastic Dimensional Design.

 

[Wolrab]

Not even vaguely approaching the stunningly proven accuracy of Plastic Dimensional Design.

You should see the incredible predictions that I have done with PDD, unfortunately you can't, as I don't allow anyone to see them. Just now another one came true!

 

[Orphia Nay]

I'm waiting for Orphia to reply, because I'm not done yet with her

I see you posting the same old stuff. Why should I reply when you're already ignoring all the other constructive criticism?

If you want to say something to me, say it.

 

[Sideroxylon]

I have posted 3 'experimental predictions' on the HDdesign forum, in an area only I have access, only to find out if it matters if expectations are shared to the public or not. that was an experiment as it was called.

And what is the hypothesis behind doing such a thing, Dutch? At best it looks like a childish ruse to hide your misses and present only your apparent hits. At worst it smacks of an over-inflated sense of your place in the workings of the universe.

 

[Dutch]

And yet, you do attempt predictions.

identifying future expressions of specific underlying themes that will find expression at specific moments in our perception of time, yes.

Unless one sees the future, a prediction is meaningless.
Identifying it, is already lessening its effect, finding a much more subtle expression if you understand what I mean

 

[Dutch]

sorry,

no time, later

 

[The Man]

identifying future expressions of specific underlying themes that will find expression at specific moments in our perception of time, yes.

No Dutch simply "identifying future expressions of specific underlying themes that will find expression" in just your perception, again contrived... certainly, complicated... certainly not

Unless one sees the future, a prediction is meaningless.
Identifying it, is already lessening its effect, finding a much more subtle expression if you understand what I mean

So which is it, Dutch, "meaningless" or "already lessening its effect"? Evidently you just don't understand what you mean.

 

[Daylightstar]

And yet, you do attempt predictions.

identifying future expressions of specific underlying themes that will find expression at specific moments in our perception of time, yes. ...

That's what I said, you do predictions, yes.

...
Unless one sees the future, a prediction is meaningless.
Identifying it, is already lessening its effect, finding a much more subtle expression if you understand what I mean

^{Hilite bt Daylightstar}

... identifying future expressions of specific underlying themes that will find expression at specific moments in our perception of time, yes. ...

^{Hilites by Daylightstar}That's what I said, you do predictions, yes.

 

[Daylightstar]

...
Identifying it, is already lessening its effect, finding a much more subtle expression if you understand what I mean

Sure I understand what you mean. The effect is so subtle in fact, that it affects no one and nothing, except you.
It is after all your number one priority. Above all else ......

... our near future in relation to the destiny of mankind has my first priority...

... this 'research'needs to proceed on a daily basis, that's the first priority

The world at large is not affected at all.

 

[Daylightstar]

I'm waiting for Orphia to reply, because I'm not done yet with her

No 'effect' there ....

As there was no 'effect' here:

... because there are some things I want to address .

That's what you call ..... predictable.

 

[Mister Earl]

sorry,

no time, later

No time? You've had maybe six or seven years since you began this hypothesis of yours. You've had nothing but time. And you've used that time to refuse to explain your method. You've done nothing more than post random word salad and asked us to take your word for it. We don't. We won't. That's not how science works. That's how kookery works. And your HDD hypothesis falls splat within the realm of kookery.

We've given you advice how to test your hypothesis scientifically. We've pleaded with you for information about your process so we could test it ourselves. Begged, even. You consistently refuse.

I don't know why you even bother posting anymore. You offer nothing new.

 

[Dutch]

I wrote on December 30, 2010 on on another forum, already emphasizing the timeframe of November 10, 2012 ( 'awakening in optima forma' )

I thought I had nothing else to mention at this moment, but this morning I wanted to find out more about the perihelion of comet 2009 HC82. I found the date of the expected perihelion and I just put it on the timeline this morning in order to log the date. I had no additional info when I logged it on the timeline Q4, 2012
[..]
later this morning the significance already became clear:
Oh yes, synchronicity.......
After I posted the above today December 30, 2010, about the expected return at perihelion of comet 2009 HC82, I thought to give the 2 Pi points a closer look, based on the very same Pi based Design as unveiled here in the HDDesign material. I mean the 2 Pi points on the current orbit of 2009 HC82 that will reach a full orbit on November 10, 2012.
Orbit of 2009 HC82 is 3.39 * 365.25 = 1238,2 days
Pi points are ( as already determined ) at 556 days ( awakening starttirigger date ) and 681 days.
556 days prior to November 10, 2012 gives May 4, 2011 !!!!, a date already identified in my previous post here as very significant in relation to this very same comet 2009 HC82:
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?p=12296&mforum=hddesign#12296
May 4, 2011, was already metioned on the timeline Q2 2011 as second Pi point Steins, directly connected to the identification of comet 2009 HC82 as part of the 'communication' and the discovery of the Pi based Design in the orbit of this comet in relation to the awakeningstimeframe.
Awakening in Optima Forma
So the orbit of 2009 HC82 is again confirming this very same Design, now when looked at it from the expected perihelion date!!!!!
The second Pi point is at 681 days prior to November 10, 2012:
December 30, 2010!!
That's today, the dicovery of this specific underlying Design!!!!

This is so profound.......
I recommend to follow the postings on the timelines regularly.
http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewforum.php?f=1&mforum=hddesign
you can login with user 'reader' and password 'reader'' .

'Awakening in optima forma', around November 10, 2012

UPDATED ON NOVEMBER 18: IT STARTED HERE DURING THIS TIMEFRAME
November 9:
Two Iranian Revolutionary Guard fighter jets fire on an unmanned American General Atomics MQ-1 Predator drone in international airspace near Kuwait.
November 10:
Palestinian militants fire a barrage of rockets from Gaza into southern Israel, in a cross-border escalation following an earlier attack in which four Israeli soldiers are injured, two seriously, when an anti-tank missile fired from the Gaza Strip hits an Israeli army jeep patrolling some 200 meters inside the Israeli border with Gaza; Israel carries out counter-strikes
November 11:
The Israel Defense Forces has fired an anti-tank missile in the direction of a mortar position in Syria after a 120mm mortar shell exploded near an Israeli post in the Golan Heights. Although the missile was reportedly intended as a "warning shot" and directed to miss the mortar position on purpose, the IDF's response marks the first time since the 1973 Yom Kippur War that Israel has fired at Syrian territory.

 

[Paul]

Really, a whole week of googling and that's the best you could do?