Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

That does not address the question in any way shape or form.

Wich question? be specific if you want a clear conversation

 

[Dutch]

When I'm dead I will be in the same condition that I was in before I was born, so it won't be bothering me all that much.

I'm sorry to hear that you think your life is meaningless, that you don't understand that your life is contributing to your own spiritual development at multi-dimensional levels and to our collective development as a whole.

You might not understand the signifigance of your life, but I do.

and i love you

 

[Dutch]

at that means is anybody's guess. If I get proof now I will cease to exist? If that is what you are saying then it is total nonsense.

No, you will cease to exist here anyway, as we all do. The problem is, that if it would be proven to you that you're existence will proceed, you will stop living. You will have lived your live for nothing, as this dimensional realm is suppost to be designed for ou to make your own progress, with the opportunities given to ou.

 

[Dutch]

sorry, have to skip post 5570

has nothing to add to a normal conversation

 

[Dutch]

I'm waiting for Orphia to reply, because I'm not done yet with her

 

[Sideroxylon]

sorry, have to skip post 5570

has nothing to add to a normal conversation

Something in common to your HDD hobby then, Dutch.

 

[dafydd]

focus man!

Why?

 

[dafydd]

No, you will cease to exist here anyway, as we all do. The problem is, that if it would be proven to you that you're existence will proceed, you will stop living. You will have lived your live for nothing, as this dimensional realm is suppost to be designed for ou to make your own progress, with the opportunities given to ou.

Designed? By who or what? Do you believe in a sky daddy?

 

[Daylightstar]

...

I have said this a dozen times already, apparently for deaf ears or lack of reading

And yet, you do attempt predictions.

 

[Daylightstar]

Your ability (or lack thereof) to demonstrate here the claim you made here has no dependence or influence upon my rights or the lack thereof.

If you have nothing to support your claim of the significance of those dates you can just say so.

In wich context did I say that? Don't take a remark out of context man

...
Its you who didn't critically examine the HDDesign material and yet you think you can allow yourselves the opinion that you are expressing here.

That's what I mean when i say you have no right for talking.
...

Actually, this thread glaringly demonstrates the untruth of your claim of non critical examination of your unsupported irrational belief.

You remain incapable of supporting any of your claims. Nothing has changed, and nothing will.

The Man's response was made in the correct context.

 

[Daylightstar]

Wich question? be specific if you want a clear conversation

^{Hilite by Daylightstar}

Which scientific findings?

indeed

Feeling juvenile today?


Oh, I'm sorry, should I just repeat the question just because you'd rather pretend that you do not know which one or were you thrown off because there appeared two question marks?
It's reasonable to suspect the former is the case.

This question:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8568027&postcount=5534

And how about an association with an astronaut (you know, in a space suit), is that allowed?
Or would that send the wrong message with respect to one of your claimed 'major underlying themes' that human consciousness should remain Earthbound?

Hmmm?

 

[Daylightstar]

You are just living your life in fanstasy aren’t you (and a rather dull and depressing fantasy at that)? Be honest .

is it that difficult to answer this question? focus man!

And a useless fantasy at that.

 

[Paul]

expected expressions of specific underlying themes aren't exact predictions.

We know that, you used the word, not us.

I have posted 3 'experimental predictions' on the HDdesign forum, in an area only I have access,

Oh, I see, word magic again.

only to find out if it matters if expectations are shared to the public or not. that was an experiment as it was called.

Well, expected expressions of specific underlying themes are notoriously shy.

Exact predictions aren't possible, unless one sees the future. I haven't seen anyone doing this

So your vague, word-magic, cherry-picking, math-scrambling timelines aren't looking to the future?

However, one can have a sense of specific underlying themes that will find expression at specific moments in our perception of time. That's nat an exact prediction.

Oh, silly me, I was under the foolish impression that saying specific things will happen at specific times was predicting them.

I have said this a dozen times already, apparently for deaf ears or lack of reading

Or perhaps because you have a pathological inability to actually reply to any questioning, preferring juvenile mockery, denial, blame, repetition and obfuscation.

 

[Paul]

Its you who didn't critically examine the HDDesign material and yet you think you can allow yourselves the opinion that you are expressing here.

The material is meaningless as you refuse to provide any rules for processing the data.

That's what I mean when i say you have no right for talking.

Saying things doesn't make them true, something you have obviously failed to notice.

You have made sceptical thinking into an objective.

That you think this is a bad thing says much about you.

 

[Mister Earl]

Hi, Dutch!

If you'd be so kind, please respond to my request made to you several years ago on the BAUT forums you used to post on before you got banned for refusing to back up your claims.

I remind you, my request was to have you outline your entire process, to include all math and graphs so that we may attempt to replicate your methods.

I predict you will again refuse and obfuscate the issue with more word salad.

 

[Paul]

If you were truly willing to help, you would do your best to comprehend this complicated material.

You refused to accept help along time ago when it was offered, whining that people won't help you now won't get you anywhere.

You have wasted your time by making stand-alone remaks about out of context details.

You post, we respond. If you ignore those responses don't expect people to take your nonsense seriously.

You aren't seriously involved with this, not at all unfortunately

I don't believe it is possible to be serious with the material.

 

[Daylightstar]

sorry, have to skip post 5570

has nothing to add to a normal conversation

Ah, you mean this post:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8641701&postcount=5570

Well, actually:
It answered two questions you asked.

It explained how your 'material' is working for people and stated generally where demonstration of such can be found.

It showed the ridiculessness of your 'confrontation seeking' statement.
(E.T.A. Actually, it stated it. It is unambiguously demonstrated after your 'confrontating' statement in this thread.)

It explains your claim why you 'are not done' with people in this thread with the help of your own statements which show that your first priorities are with your entirely unsupported and evidently unsupportable irrational belief/activities on the internet.

It seems it had plenty to add.

However, what you call 'normal conversation' appears to really mean:

Please, uncritically accept and talk about my 'intuitions' as if they are real.

And of course, that will not likely happen on this forum. You should learn to accept that.

 

[Daylightstar]

Designed? By who or what? Do you believe in a sky daddy?

He certainly uses an apparent belief in a sky daddy.

...
If its not God that has put Phobos and Deimos in such an intelligent orbit around Mars.....

Than who did?...

 

[Paul]

The hidden intelligent correlations between our 3D reality and other dimensional expressions are based on our perception of time yes.

The many wrong things in that sentence have been explained to you ad nauseam, but you still trot out the same old dogma.

Time in itself is meaningless,

Then HDD is meaningless in it's entirety.

unless you try to say that HDDesign is meaningless.

Oh I don't try to say it.

In that case you have chosen the wrong words.

I think it is a more than fair and undeservedly polite choice of words.

Funny that you say I'm ignoring opportunities, you are already starting to talk like me. Keep some distance if I may advice you.

Excellent advice, we wouldn't want to sound like you, would we?

 

[Paul]

I'm sorry to hear that you think your life is meaningless, that you don't understand that your life is contributing to your own spiritual development at multi-dimensional levels and to our collective development as a whole.

And just how did you come by this incredible knowledge, O wise one?

You might not understand the signifigance of your life, but I do.

There's nothing like a bit of staggering arrogance to go with delusions of cosmic importance.