Hyper Dimensional Design

[Daylightstar]

... Why one bothers to go to a discussion forum and refuses to discuss is beyond me. What's the point? ...

Dutch's point was indicated in his "re posting moderated content" post:

If my posts have to be split in halfs, than I am the one to do so.

It is essential that it has been read what I have to tell, ...

It is entirely in his character to disrespect the rules and intent of a discussion forum, as has been documented in the past.
He thinks him posting his wall o texts has an 'influence'.

Pure magical thinking.

 

[Wolrab]

I claim that exact predictions aren't possible, unless you are 'seeing' the exact future. I have never claimed to do so, HDDesign is about expressions of specific underlying themes at specific moments in our perception of time. If Wolrab is able to make exact predictions he should be on primetime tv.

Funny thing there, I am on prime time American Television quite often. I am on a Major network and cable channels several times a year for the past 8 years.

There is even a non-significant chance I have been seen by many forum members. PM for particulars.

 

[Daylightstar]

Dutch's point was indicated in his "re posting moderated content" post:

If my posts have to be split in halfs, than I am the one to do so.

It is essential that it has been read what I have to tell, ...

....

Oh, and here:

Besides the fact that a few hundred of thousands of readers has taken knowledge of this specific thread,...

and here:

...The 'times read' is more important, don't think they read it because of these irrelevant interruptions

 

[Orphia Nay]

Well Orphia, Darby is wrong so you can't hide behind him.

I think you should indeed find out what the diffrence between is, maybe we can finally expect an intelligent contribution from you.

find out yourselves Orphia, I would really enjoy a conversation with you in which your contributions will show that you have done your research and that you actually try to understand what HDDesign is all about. Don't hide behind others.

If you have a problem with my posts, it's your own fault. You don't listen to criticism - you ignore it, then say you haven't been debunked. Once again, HDD is all in your mind. If you actually listened to me (and others) you would see the intelligent contributions.

"Hide behind others"? First I make others do my work, now I'm hiding behind them! You really have a thing about me, don't you?

If you want this to stop you and others just have to stop posting. I'm not crossposting here so the thread could become dormant if that's what you want. I for one, will stop by for posting significant findings if I feel the need.

So to make this stop, we stop, then you keep going. Do you even read your own posts?

 

[Dutch]

It's 1:45 am overhere, if it's alright with Darby I will respond later

 

[Blue Mountain]

What a shock it will be.....

I can't figure out your meaning or intent with that statement.

 

[Blue Mountain]

Only if you want to monitor an ongoing HD Tetrahedron pattern you should take steps of 913 days instead of 911 days.

But why, Dutch, why? You've simply tossed this requirement into the thread with absolutely nothing to back it up.

For instance, if you want to monitor and ongoing HD Tetrahedron based pattern of let's say 4 step, than we talk about a timeframe of 3.652 days ( 4* 913) instead of 3.644 ( 4*911 ) with the start and end as peak dates (+/-).

Again, why?

Although I have noticed several times in the past that expected expression of specific underlying themes seemed late, I didn't mentioned it because I consider a difference of let's say 8 days too much. Now it appears that the definition of an ongoing HD Tetrahedron pattern was in fact wrong and should take steps of exactly 2,5 years.

Have you considered the possibility that the whole concept is just flat out wrong?

That's why ongoing HD Tetrahedron patterns aren't mentioned on the timelines because I didn't use it anymore.

Well, it's a start. Maybe you'll eventually come to the same conclusion about HDD overall.

I agree it isn't smart of me not to mention it earlier as these dates are equally seperated and recurring every 2,5 years in opposite orientation in our perception of time of an Earth orbit

Given that lots of things happen all the time, it's no wonder that some things occur 2.5 years apart. Also any increment between 0.01 and 99.99 years apart.

The Titanic sank on 15 April 1912. The Costa Concordia sank on 13 January 2012. Note that 15-13=2, and 4 (April) - 1 (January) = 3! OMG! There's only a difference of ONE between those two numbers on two huge ships that sank (almost) exactly 100 years apart! And how many moons does Earth have? ONE! It's amazing!

(See what fun you can have when you simply pull stuff out of your butt?)

There's no problem with a single HD Tetrahedron though

Aside from the fact it doesn't exist.

 

[The Man]

Yes, nice post DarbyII, unfortunately Darby is wrong. And you to man, or show it.

Once again, quoting a post from me with no response addressed to me, please try harder Dutch.

 

[Dutch]

I will ask you specifically to show the calculations for transforming a hyper dimensional platonic solid into geometrically determined orbital positions of an orbiting planet.

Which has already been answered in this thread, with a link.

 

[Dutch]

Another one:

Please 'recalculate' the HD Cube spot near mount St. Helens for us.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6648023&postcount=3815

Which has also been answered in this thread. I have explained that due to the continental drift, a volcano as a fixed spot on the solid outer crust will 'move' away from its original location. In the case of Mount St. helens it means to the East and to the North. If you reverse this continental drift, mount St helens would 'move' towards the location of current Yellowstone, marking the HD Cube around 45 degrees North latitude.

 

[Paul]

Which has already been answered in this thread, with a link.

Then it should pose no problems.

 

[Dutch]

Just one example:


You're one monumental barbaric liar, Dutch.

All questions you are referring to in this post were already answered in this thread. It's your responsibility not to read the information given in this thread. I have mentioned several times here that I will ignore repeated questions that are already dealt with in this thread . You know that.

Calling me one monumental barbaric liar is as low as it can get.

 

[Dutch]

Dutch, I would put to you that HDDelusion makes you (all identified negativity coming from you) a repulsively antagonistic individual.

It clearly shows in your conduct towards other people.

A little self-examination would suit you.

 

[Dutch]

Dutch probably does know, but he 'rationalizes' (lies) it away.

I am not a liar, period.

 

[Dutch]

I'm not talking about Darby, I'm talking about you and your 913/911 days.


OK, so now we can add changing the number whenever you like to Dutch's List of Dishonest Manipulations that He Says Obey the Magic Invisible Principles of HDD.


What possible justification could you have for that?


You are wrong and you are desperately trying to invent a justification for more blatant numerological dishonesty.


Is that supposed to suddenly make you right?


I'm afraid you've lost me again, can you go back to something that at least resembles coherent English.


Apart from it not existing.

So explain why I am wrong

 

[Dutch]

As I've said before, when you want to have an honest debate, feel free to start one.

As for level, constant lying and refusal to engage do not engender high expectations.

I don't have high expectations from you, but you could at least try.

 

[Wolrab]

So explain why I am wrong

That has been answered in this thread on page one, five years ago. It is your responsibility to not read the answers.

 

[Wolrab]

Yo, Dutch! April 13th is coming up quick. What is your next significant date and what do you propose will happen?

 

[Paul]

I have explained that due to the continental drift, a volcano as a fixed spot on the solid outer crust will 'move' away from its original location.

You are also fond of telling us that actual positions do not matter, which is it?

In the case of Mount St. helens it means to the East and to the North.

The North American plate moves roughly south-west.

If you reverse this continental drift, mount St helens would 'move' towards the location of current Yellowstone, marking the HD Cube around 45 degrees North latitude.

How old do you think Mount St. Helens is? And how fast do you think the North American plate is moving?

If we take reasonably generous figures of 5cm/y for 40000 years the movement is 2km.

 

[Dutch]

DarbyII

Sorry, Dutch but I'm not wrong here. I didn't almost have you fooled. You have you absolutely fooled. You don't understand your own equation.

365 days/360 degrees - is read "1.014 days per degree". It tells you the period, in days, required for (in this case) Earth to move along its orbital path such that it subtends an arc of 1 degree, 1.014 days. Multiple that by 360 days and you have 365 "degrees".

It does not, however, tell you how many degrees of arc the Earth's orbit subtends in one day 0.986 degrees per day). That equation requires 360 degrees/365 days - "0.986 degrees per day". Multiply that by 365 days and you have 360 degrees.

We are talking about the calculation of a specific geometrically determined interference point as expressed in Earth days

fact is, that my calculation is right and yours is wrong

Your statement that I'm off with a few days is just not true

You end up with a year of 355 days or so, you do understand that this is not the number of days in a year?

Why is is so hard for you to admit?