Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
you like 'dishonesty' as much as earl likes salads

From your first post in this thread:
...
It's about changing the 'energy' involved.

Kind a 'Heisenberg princible' at macro level, with positive energy (love) as driving force.
...

Actually, with HDDesign HDDelusion, as is plainly visible, it is negative energy (flagrant dishonesty) which is your driving force.

HDDelusion is ugly, very very ugly.
 
Apprently but evidently, in that Faustian like bargain, he’s gained "The Force"....


Guess he still needs to work on the Jedi mind trick though.

You do overestimate your pressence here man, compared to other consciousness levels you are nothing but a nuthead.
 
just say it in your own words Day, why am I dishonest? you have to explain
This is dishonest as well.
The link and the links contained therein demonstrate your dishonesty.

But you already know this, since those linked posts have passed in front of your eyes already.

It is dishonest of you to pretend not to know this.
So no, I don't have to explain them...again.
 
From your first post in this thread:


Actually, with HDDesign HDDelusion, as is plainly visible, it is negative energy (flagrant dishonesty) which is your driving force.

HDDelusion is ugly, very very ugly.

apart of the change in 'delusion' , I do agree with you here. Its especially the dark side of our consciousness that bares the fingerprints of this hidden underlying design ( or patterns Ufo ).
You better do something with it now you know
 
This is dishonest as well.
The link and the links contained therein demonstrate your dishonesty.

But you already know this, since those linked posts have passed in front of your eyes already.

It is dishonest of you to pretend not to know this.
So no, I don't have to explain them...again.

waiting.......
 
Know what'll never prove HDD, Dutch? Driving up your post count with non-informative posts.
Know what's the only thing that could prove HDD, Dutch? Applying the scientific method and testing it.

And for six or seven years, now, you've been doing the former and not the latter.
 
What makes you think that human awareness is the only expression of consciousness?

Way to miss the point Dutch...


http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/reality?region=us

reality(re•al•i•ty)

Syllabification:
• On
• Off
Pronunciation:/rēˈalətē, /

noun (plural realities)
• 1 the world or the state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional idea of them:



If that is not clear enough for you then I again recommend you look up the meaning of the word reality.

So I guess this wasn’t you…

No reality without consciousness. I agree to talk about patterns rather than Intelligent Design, because its us that are creating this reality, no Intelligent Design by a god from above of which we aren't part of.

Unless you mean that “us” the ones “creating this reality” aren’t human.




And I asked the question first...


“No reality without consciousness”? Whos “consciousness”? What “consciousness”? and just whos or what “reality” do you think that is?


Dancing around it to just end right back exactly where you were yesterday isn’t going to help you.
 
You do overestimate your pressence here man, compared to other consciousness levels you are nothing but a nuthead.

I provided no estimation (over or otherwise) of my "pressence here". So whatever you’re bemoaning about it can only be just you and it does seem accurately descriptive therein.
 
Know what'll never prove HDD, Dutch? Driving up your post count with non-informative posts.
Know what's the only thing that could prove HDD, Dutch? Applying the scientific method and testing it.

And for six or seven years, now, you've been doing the former and not the latter.

I prefer posts with HDdesign content, its you guys who are responsible for the 'noise' that drives up the post count. The 'times read' is more important, don't think they read it because of these irrelevant interruptions
 
I prefer posts with HDdesign content, its you guys who are responsible for the 'noise' that drives up the post count. The 'times read' is more important, don't think they read it because of these irrelevant interruptions

Yes, you don't like to be challenged and you don't really like or intend to discuss. For which there is ample evidence in this thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom